Significant Cost Savings and Improved Early Clinical Outcomes in Medicare Patients Utilizing a Clinician-Controlled Telerehabilitation System Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

被引:1
|
作者
Summers, Spencer H. [1 ]
Gnecco, Tamara [1 ]
Slotkin, Eric M. [2 ]
Law, Tsun Y. [1 ]
Nunley, Ryan M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Special Surg Florida, 300 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd, W Palm Beach, FL 33401 USA
[2] Orthopaed Associates Reading, Reading, PA USA
[3] Washington Univ, Dept Orthopaed, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
total knee arthroplasty; rehabilitation; telemedicine; recovery; economics; OUTPATIENT PHYSICAL-THERAPY; HOME EXERCISE; TOTAL HIP; REHABILITATION; NONINFERIORITY; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2024.02.040
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The costs and benefits of different rehabilitation protocols following total knee arthroplasty are unclear. The emergence of telerehabilitation has introduced the potential for enhanced patient convenience and cost reduction. The purpose of this study was to assess the cost difference between standard physical therapy (SPT) and a telerehabilitation home-based clinician-controlled therapy system (HCTS). Methods: A prospectively enrolled, consecutive series of 109 Medicare patients who received SPT were compared to 101 Medicare patients who were treated with a HCTS. The analysis focused on total rehabilitation costs and the assessment of outcome measures: knee range of motion, visual analog scale pain levels, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement. Results: The HCTS group demonstrated not only statistically significantly lower average costs but also faster and sustained knee range of motion improvements. Furthermore, in comparison to SPT, the HCTS group exhibited superior visual analog scale pain scores and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement functional scores at all assessment points postoperatively, which were statistically significant (all P < .001) and surpassed the minimal clinically important difference thresholds. Conclusions: The HCTS used in this study exhibited a remarkable cost-saving advantage of $2,460 per patient compared to standard therapy. As approximately 500,000 primary total knee arthroplasties in the United States are covered by Medicare annually, a switch to HCTS could yield total cost savings of more than $1.23 billion per year for our taxpayer-funded health care system. Furthermore, the HCTS cohort demonstrated superior functional outcomes and improved pain scores across all assessment time points, exceeding the minimal clinically important difference. (c) 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:S139 / S144
页数:6
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [41] Image-free handheld robotic-assisted technology improved the accuracy of implant positioning compared to conventional instrumentation in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty, without additional benefits in improvement of clinical outcomes
    Ali Albelooshi
    Muhieddine Hamie
    Peter Bollars
    Saeed Althani
    Rami Salameh
    Malak Almasri
    Martijn G. M. Schotanus
    Prashant Meshram
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2023, 31 : 4833 - 4841
  • [42] Two-year fixation and ten-year clinical outcomes of total knee arthroplasty inserted with normal-curing bone cement and slow-curing bone cement: A randomized controlled trial in 54 patients
    Mosegaard, Sebastian Breddam
    Rytter, Soren
    Madsen, Frank
    Odgaard, Anders
    Soballe, Kjeld
    Stilling, Maiken
    KNEE, 2021, 33 : 110 - 124