Balancing Progress and Responsibility: A Synthesis of Sustainability Trade-Offs of AI-Based Systems

被引:0
|
作者
Kumar, Apoorva Nalini Pradeep [1 ]
Bogner, Justus [1 ]
Funke, Markus [1 ]
Lago, Patricia [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
来源
IEEE 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE COMPANION, ICSA-C 2024 | 2024年
关键词
artificial intelligence; sustainability; trade-offs; costs; benefits; rapid review; interviews;
D O I
10.1109/ICSA-C63560.2024.00045
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities have increased the eagerness of companies to integrate AI into software systems. While AI can be used to have a positive impact on several dimensions of sustainability, this is often overshadowed by its potential negative influence. While many studies have explored sustainability factors in isolation, there is insufficient holistic coverage of potential sustainability benefits or costs that practitioners need to consider during decision-making for AI adoption. We therefore aim to synthesize trade-offs related to sustainability in the context of integrating AI into software systems. We want to make the sustainability benefits and costs of integrating AI more transparent and accessible for practitioners. The study was conducted in collaboration with a Dutch financial organization. We first performed a rapid review that led to the inclusion of 151 research papers. Afterward, we conducted six semi-structured interviews to enrich the data with industry perspectives. The combined results showcase the potential sustainability benefits and costs of integrating AI. The labels synthesized from the review regarding potential sustainability benefits were clustered into 16 themes, with energy management being the most frequently mentioned one. 11 themes were identified in the interviews, with the top mentioned theme being employee wellbeing. Regarding sustainability costs, the review discovered seven themes, with deployment issues being the most popular one, followed by ethics & society. Environmental issues was the top theme from the interviews. Our results provide valuable insights to organizations and practitioners for understanding the potential sustainability implications of adopting AI.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 214
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] OPPOSING VIEWS AND TRADE-OFFS IN CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY (A LITERATURE REVIEW)
    Panta, Nancy Diana
    ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT (ESD): 40TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT, 2019, : 88 - 95
  • [22] Trade-offs in the performance of alternative farming systems
    Ramankutty, Navin
    Ricciardi, Vincent
    Mehrabi, Zia
    Seufert, Verena
    AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 50 : 97 - 105
  • [23] Choices, Responsibility, and Trade-Offs: A Review of Designing Research in the Social Sciences
    Loum, Constantine S. L.
    QUALITATIVE REPORT, 2013, 18 (25)
  • [24] Searching for the right fit - Balancing IT security management model trade-offs
    Hawkey, Kirstie
    Muldner, Kasia
    Beznosov, Konstantin
    IEEE INTERNET COMPUTING, 2008, 12 (03) : 22 - 30
  • [25] Greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet pattern in the United States is associated with sustainability trade-offs
    Conrad, Zach
    Korol, Madison
    Distaso, Chloe
    Wu, Songze
    NUTRITION JOURNAL, 2024, 23 (01)
  • [26] Implementing Responsible AI: Tensions and Trade-Offs Between Ethics Aspects
    Sanderson, Conrad
    Douglas, David
    Lu, Qinghua
    2023 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS, IJCNN, 2023,
  • [27] Sustainability trade-offs in bioenergy development in the Philippines: An application of conjoint analysis
    Acosta, Lilibeth A.
    Eugenio, Elena A.
    Enano, Nelson H., Jr.
    Magcale-Macandog, Damasa B.
    Vega, Belita A.
    Macandog, Paula Beatrice M.
    Eugenio, Jemimah Mae A.
    Lopez, Marilou A.
    Salvacion, Arnold R.
    Lucht, Wolfgang
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2014, 64 : 20 - 41
  • [28] SUSTAINABILITY, VALUE TRADE-OFFS, AND ELECTRIC UTILITY PLANNING - A CANADIAN EXAMPLE
    DANIELS, TL
    ENERGY POLICY, 1994, 22 (12) : 1045 - 1054
  • [29] Untangling the interactions of sustainability targets: synergies and trade-offs in the Northern European context
    Jari Lyytimäki
    Kirsi-Marja Lonkila
    Eeva Furman
    Kaisa Korhonen-Kurki
    Satu Lähteenoja
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2021, 23 : 3458 - 3473
  • [30] The triple-bottom-line: Framing of trade-offs in sustainability planning practice
    Coffman M.
    Umemoto K.
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2010, 12 (5) : 597 - 610