Applicability and performance of 18F-FDG PET-based modalities for whole-body cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Das, K. J. [1 ]
Meena, J. K. [2 ]
Kumar, D. [3 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci AIIMS, Natl Canc Inst NCI AIIMS, Dept Nucl Med, New Delhi, India
[2] All India Inst Med Sci AIIMS, Natl Canc Inst NCI AIIMS, Dept Prevent Oncol, New Delhi, India
[3] Vardhman Mahavir Med Coll & Safdarjung Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, New Delhi, India
关键词
Screening; Early detection; PET scan; F-18-FDG PET; Cancer prevention; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE; OVEREXPRESSION; PET/MRI; BREAST;
D O I
10.1007/s11604-024-01659-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose Screening tests are the cornerstone for early detection and optimal management of cancers. Most of the present cancer-screening tests are intrusive, time-consuming, and specifically target a particular anatomical site or cancer type. Only a few studies have reported the objective measures of F-18-FDG PET-based cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals. This review and meta-analysis is an attempt to assess the applicability and performance of F-18-FDG PET-based modalities for whole-body cancer screening. Materials and methods The systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were conducted using relevant MeSH terms and keywords, for articles published in the last 2 decades (2000-2022). Pooled estimates of diagnostic test accuracy-including sensitivity, specificity, positive-likelihood ratio, negative-likelihood ratio, and hierarchical summary ROC (HSROC) curve were generated using bivariate random-effects meta-analysis. Results Seventeen studies were included in the systematic review and 13 studies were deemed eligible for meta-analysis. The mean estimates of pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive-likelihood ratio, negative-likelihood ratio, and Odds ratio using F-18-FDG PET with a 95% confidence interval were 0.47 (0.25-0.69), 0.97 (0.95-0.98), 18.8 (6.8-51.5), 0.45 (0.27-0.76), 41.0 (7.9-211.8) and for F-18-FDG PET/CT were 0.83 (0.75-0.88), 0.98 (0.97-0.99), 49.7 (29.2-84.5), 0.15 (0.8-0.28), 329.9 (125.0-870.8), respectively. Among screening modalities, F-18-FDG PET/CT had a higher accuracy i.e., the area under the HSROC curve (AUC): 0.91 (0.87-0.95) compared to F-18-FDG PET: 0.72 (0.61-0.82). Conclusion This study demonstrates that currently F-18-FDG PET-based screening has limited applicability for population-based cancer-screening programs. However, it has a promising role as a combined screening strategy for at-risk individuals and allows for comprehensive diagnostic and prognostic evaluation in high-resource settings.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 281
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Combined early dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT and conventional whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Yiqiu Zhang
    Yun Dong
    Wenjun Yu
    Shuguang Chen
    Haojun Yu
    Beilei Li
    Hongcheng Shi
    Abdominal Radiology, 2023, 48 : 3127 - 3134
  • [42] 18F-FDG PET and PET/CT as a diagnostic method for Ewing sarcoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Seth, Nimish
    Seth, Ishith
    Bulloch, Gabriella
    Siu, Adrian Hang Yue
    Guo, Allen
    Chatterjee, Rukmini
    MacManus, Michael
    Donnan, Leo
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2022, 69 (03)
  • [43] RETRACTED: The Diagnostic Performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Recurrent Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (Retracted Article)
    Gu, A.
    Shan, Yuezhan
    Huo, Huasong
    Ding, Chao
    Sun, Caixia
    APPLIED BIONICS AND BIOMECHANICS, 2022, 2022
  • [44] Diagnostic Performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Native Valve Endocarditis: Systematic Review and Bivariate Meta-Analysis
    Kamani, Christel H.
    Allenbach, Gilles
    Jreige, Mario
    Pavon, Anna G.
    Meyer, Marie
    Testart, Nathalie
    Firsova, Maria
    Vieira, Victor Fernandes
    Boughdad, Sarah
    Lalonde, Marie Nicod
    Schaefer, Niklaus
    Guery, Benoit
    Monney, Pierre
    Prior, John O.
    Treglia, Giorgio
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2020, 10 (10)
  • [45] Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with spinal infection: a systematic review and a bivariate meta-analysis
    Giorgio Treglia
    Mariarosa Pascale
    Elena Lazzeri
    Wouter van der Bruggen
    Roberto C. Delgado Bolton
    Andor W. J. M. Glaudemans
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2020, 47 : 1287 - 1301
  • [46] The diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in recurrent renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fan, Liding
    Xu, Youqiang
    Zhao, Jiahe
    Tang, Weihao
    Zhang, Zhonghang
    Zhang, Yunfei
    Xue, Qingjie
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL IMAGING, 2023, 11 (02) : 199 - 208
  • [47] Value of 18F-FDG PET/MR in the Detection of Pulmonary Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Diagnostic Performance
    Mirshahvalad, S.
    Hinzpeter, R.
    Kohan, A.
    Anconina, R.
    Kulanthaivelu, R.
    Ortega, C.
    Metser, U.
    Veit-Haibach, P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2022, 49 (SUPPL 1) : S465 - S465
  • [48] The diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in recurrent renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liding Fan
    Youqiang Xu
    Jiahe Zhao
    Weihao Tang
    Zhonghang Zhang
    Yunfei Zhang
    Qingjie Xue
    Clinical and Translational Imaging, 2023, 11 : 199 - 208
  • [49] Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with spinal infection: a systematic review and a bivariate meta-analysis
    Treglia, Giorgio
    Pascale, Mariarosa
    Lazzeri, Elena
    van der Bruggen, Wouter
    Bolton, Roberto C. Delgado
    Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2020, 47 (05) : 1287 - 1301
  • [50] Impact of Patient Preparation on the Diagnostic Performance of 18F-FDG PET in Cardiac Sarcoidosis A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Tang, Reuben
    Wang, Jeffrey Tzu-Yu
    Wang, Louis
    Le, Ken
    Huang, Yeqian
    Hickey, Adam James
    Emmett, Louise
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 41 (07) : E327 - E339