Applicability and performance of 18F-FDG PET-based modalities for whole-body cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Das, K. J. [1 ]
Meena, J. K. [2 ]
Kumar, D. [3 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci AIIMS, Natl Canc Inst NCI AIIMS, Dept Nucl Med, New Delhi, India
[2] All India Inst Med Sci AIIMS, Natl Canc Inst NCI AIIMS, Dept Prevent Oncol, New Delhi, India
[3] Vardhman Mahavir Med Coll & Safdarjung Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, New Delhi, India
关键词
Screening; Early detection; PET scan; F-18-FDG PET; Cancer prevention; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE; OVEREXPRESSION; PET/MRI; BREAST;
D O I
10.1007/s11604-024-01659-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose Screening tests are the cornerstone for early detection and optimal management of cancers. Most of the present cancer-screening tests are intrusive, time-consuming, and specifically target a particular anatomical site or cancer type. Only a few studies have reported the objective measures of F-18-FDG PET-based cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals. This review and meta-analysis is an attempt to assess the applicability and performance of F-18-FDG PET-based modalities for whole-body cancer screening. Materials and methods The systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were conducted using relevant MeSH terms and keywords, for articles published in the last 2 decades (2000-2022). Pooled estimates of diagnostic test accuracy-including sensitivity, specificity, positive-likelihood ratio, negative-likelihood ratio, and hierarchical summary ROC (HSROC) curve were generated using bivariate random-effects meta-analysis. Results Seventeen studies were included in the systematic review and 13 studies were deemed eligible for meta-analysis. The mean estimates of pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive-likelihood ratio, negative-likelihood ratio, and Odds ratio using F-18-FDG PET with a 95% confidence interval were 0.47 (0.25-0.69), 0.97 (0.95-0.98), 18.8 (6.8-51.5), 0.45 (0.27-0.76), 41.0 (7.9-211.8) and for F-18-FDG PET/CT were 0.83 (0.75-0.88), 0.98 (0.97-0.99), 49.7 (29.2-84.5), 0.15 (0.8-0.28), 329.9 (125.0-870.8), respectively. Among screening modalities, F-18-FDG PET/CT had a higher accuracy i.e., the area under the HSROC curve (AUC): 0.91 (0.87-0.95) compared to F-18-FDG PET: 0.72 (0.61-0.82). Conclusion This study demonstrates that currently F-18-FDG PET-based screening has limited applicability for population-based cancer-screening programs. However, it has a promising role as a combined screening strategy for at-risk individuals and allows for comprehensive diagnostic and prognostic evaluation in high-resource settings.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 281
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Meta-analysis of the performance of 18F-FDG PET in cutaneous melanoma
    Felisa Jiménez-Requena
    Roberto C. Delgado-Bolton
    Cristina Fernández-Pérez
    Sanjiv S. Gambhir
    Judy Schwimmer
    José M. Pérez-Vázquez
    José L. Carreras-Delgado
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2010, 37 : 284 - 300
  • [22] Meta-analysis of the performance of 18F-FDG PET in cutaneous melanoma
    Jimenez-Requena, Felisa
    Delgado-Bolton, Roberto C.
    Fernandez-Perez, Cristina
    Gambhir, Sanjiv S.
    Schwimmer, Judy
    Perez-Vazquez, Jose M.
    Carreras-Delgado, Jose L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2010, 37 (02) : 284 - 300
  • [23] 18F-FDG PET Radiomics as Predictor of Treatment Response in Oesophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Deantonio, Letizia
    Garo, Maria Luisa
    Paone, Gaetano
    Valli, Maria Carla
    Cappio, Stefano
    Davide La Regina
    Cefali, Marco
    Palmarocchi, Maria Celeste
    Vannelli, Alberto
    De Dosso, Sara
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [24] Brain 18F-FDG PET for the diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis: a systematic review and a meta-analysis
    Bordonne, Manon
    Chawki, Mohammad B.
    Doyen, Matthieu
    Kas, Aurelie
    Guedj, Eric
    Tyvaert, Louise
    Verger, Antoine
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2021, 48 (12) : 3847 - 3858
  • [25] Brain 18F-FDG PET for the diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis: a systematic review and a meta-analysis
    Manon Bordonne
    Mohammad B. Chawki
    Matthieu Doyen
    Aurelie Kas
    Eric Guedj
    Louise Tyvaert
    Antoine Verger
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2021, 48 : 3847 - 3858
  • [26] 18F-FDG PET/MRI in Detection of Pulmonary Malignancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Mirshahvalad, Seyed Ali
    Metser, Ur
    Dias, Adriano Basso
    Ortega, Claudia
    Yeung, Jonathan
    Veit-Haibach, Patrick
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 307 (02)
  • [27] Prognostic Value of 18F-FDG PET in Neuroendocrine Neoplasm A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Han, Sangwon
    Lee, Hyo Sang
    Woo, Sungmin
    Kim, Tae-Hyung
    Yoo, Changhoon
    Ryoo, Baek-Yeol
    Ryu, Jin-Sook
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 46 (09) : 723 - 731
  • [28] The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in infectious endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yan, Jinzhu
    Zhang, Chao
    Niue, Yuming
    Yuan, Ruixia
    Zeng, Xiantao
    Ge, Xingyao
    Yang, Yi
    Peng, Xinyu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 54 (05) : 337 - 342
  • [29] Assessing the role of 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of soft tissue musculoskeletal malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Elba C. Etchebehere
    Brian P. Hobbs
    Denái R. Milton
    Osama Malawi
    Shreyaskumar Patel
    Robert S. Benjamin
    Homer A. Macapinlac
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2016, 43 : 860 - 870
  • [30] Assessing the role of 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of soft tissue musculoskeletal malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Etchebehere, Elba C.
    Hobbs, Brian P.
    Milton, Denai R.
    Malawi, Osama
    Patel, Shreyaskumar
    Benjamin, Robert S.
    Macapinlac, Homer A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2016, 43 (05) : 860 - 870