Applicability and performance of 18F-FDG PET-based modalities for whole-body cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Das, K. J. [1 ]
Meena, J. K. [2 ]
Kumar, D. [3 ]
机构
[1] All India Inst Med Sci AIIMS, Natl Canc Inst NCI AIIMS, Dept Nucl Med, New Delhi, India
[2] All India Inst Med Sci AIIMS, Natl Canc Inst NCI AIIMS, Dept Prevent Oncol, New Delhi, India
[3] Vardhman Mahavir Med Coll & Safdarjung Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, New Delhi, India
关键词
Screening; Early detection; PET scan; F-18-FDG PET; Cancer prevention; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE; OVEREXPRESSION; PET/MRI; BREAST;
D O I
10.1007/s11604-024-01659-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose Screening tests are the cornerstone for early detection and optimal management of cancers. Most of the present cancer-screening tests are intrusive, time-consuming, and specifically target a particular anatomical site or cancer type. Only a few studies have reported the objective measures of F-18-FDG PET-based cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals. This review and meta-analysis is an attempt to assess the applicability and performance of F-18-FDG PET-based modalities for whole-body cancer screening. Materials and methods The systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following PRISMA guidelines. Literature searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were conducted using relevant MeSH terms and keywords, for articles published in the last 2 decades (2000-2022). Pooled estimates of diagnostic test accuracy-including sensitivity, specificity, positive-likelihood ratio, negative-likelihood ratio, and hierarchical summary ROC (HSROC) curve were generated using bivariate random-effects meta-analysis. Results Seventeen studies were included in the systematic review and 13 studies were deemed eligible for meta-analysis. The mean estimates of pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive-likelihood ratio, negative-likelihood ratio, and Odds ratio using F-18-FDG PET with a 95% confidence interval were 0.47 (0.25-0.69), 0.97 (0.95-0.98), 18.8 (6.8-51.5), 0.45 (0.27-0.76), 41.0 (7.9-211.8) and for F-18-FDG PET/CT were 0.83 (0.75-0.88), 0.98 (0.97-0.99), 49.7 (29.2-84.5), 0.15 (0.8-0.28), 329.9 (125.0-870.8), respectively. Among screening modalities, F-18-FDG PET/CT had a higher accuracy i.e., the area under the HSROC curve (AUC): 0.91 (0.87-0.95) compared to F-18-FDG PET: 0.72 (0.61-0.82). Conclusion This study demonstrates that currently F-18-FDG PET-based screening has limited applicability for population-based cancer-screening programs. However, it has a promising role as a combined screening strategy for at-risk individuals and allows for comprehensive diagnostic and prognostic evaluation in high-resource settings.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 281
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic Performance of Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/MR in M Staging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Mirshahvalad, S.
    Hinzpeter, R.
    Kohan, A.
    Anconina, R.
    Kulanthaivelu, R.
    Ortega, C.
    Metser, U.
    Veit-Haibach, P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2022, 49 (SUPPL 1) : S105 - S105
  • [2] Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Suspected Paraneoplastic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy
    Sheikhbahaei, Sara
    Marcus, Charles V.
    Fragomeni, Roberto S.
    Rowe, Steven P.
    Javadi, Mehrbod S.
    Solnes, Lilja B.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2017, 58 (07) : 1031 - 1036
  • [3] 18F-FDG PET and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Vulvar Cancer A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Triumbari, Elizabeth K. A.
    de Koster, Elizabeth J.
    Rufini, Vittoria
    Fragomeni, Simona M.
    Garganese, Giorgia
    Collarino, Angela
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 46 (02) : 125 - 132
  • [4] Diagnostic performance of whole-body [18F]FDG PET/MR in cancer M staging: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Seyed Ali Mirshahvalad
    Andres Kohan
    Ur Metser
    Ricarda Hinzpeter
    Claudia Ortega
    Adam Farag
    Patrick Veit-Haibach
    European Radiology, 2024, 34 : 673 - 685
  • [5] Diagnostic performance of whole-body [18F]FDG PET/MR in cancer M staging: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mirshahvalad, Seyed Ali
    Kohan, Andres
    Metser, Ur
    Hinzpeter, Ricarda
    Ortega, Claudia
    Farag, Adam
    Veit-Haibach, Patrick
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (01) : 673 - 685
  • [6] A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF WHOLE-BODY 18F-FDG PET AND 18F-FDG PET/CT IN DETECTING OCCULT MALIGNANCY IN PATIENTS WITH IDIOPATHIC INFLAMMATORY MYOPATHY
    Ali, A.
    Alkilany, R.
    Asif, J.
    Basida, B.
    Al-Sagri, Z.
    Mahabadi, N.
    Sarakbi, H.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2022, 81 : 746 - 746
  • [7] 18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI diagnostic performance in M staging for non–small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tássia Machado Medeiros
    Stephan Altmayer
    Guilherme Watte
    Matheus Zanon
    Adriano Basso Dias
    Natália Henz Concatto
    Julia Hoefel Paes
    Rita Mattiello
    Francisco de Souza Santos
    Tan-Lucien Mohammed
    Nupur Verma
    Bruno Hochhegger
    European Radiology, 2020, 30 : 3641 - 3649
  • [8] 18F-FDG PET/MRI in endometrial cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bezzi, Carolina
    Zambella, Enrica
    Ghezzo, Samuele
    Fallanca, Federico
    Gajate, Ana Maria Samanes
    Franchini, Annalisa
    Ironi, Gabriele
    Bergamini, Alice
    Monaco, Lavinia
    Evangelista, Laura
    Mangili, Giorgia
    De Cobelli, Francesco
    Gianolli, Luigi
    Mapelli, Paola
    Picchio, Maria
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL IMAGING, 2022, 10 (01) : 45 - 58
  • [9] 18F-FDG PET/MRI in endometrial cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Carolina Bezzi
    Enrica Zambella
    Samuele Ghezzo
    Federico Fallanca
    Ana Maria Samanes Gajate
    Annalisa Franchini
    Gabriele Ironi
    Alice Bergamini
    Lavinia Monaco
    Laura Evangelista
    Giorgia Mangili
    Francesco De Cobelli
    Luigi Gianolli
    Paola Mapelli
    Maria Picchio
    Clinical and Translational Imaging, 2022, 10 : 45 - 58
  • [10] 18F-FDG PET/CT and whole-body MRI diagnostic performance in M staging for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Machado Medeiros, Tassia
    Altmayer, Stephan
    Watte, Guilherme
    Zanon, Matheus
    Basso Dias, Adriano
    Henz Concatto, Natalia
    Hoefel Paes, Julia
    Mattiello, Rita
    de Souza Santos, Francisco
    Mohammed, Tan-Lucien
    Verma, Nupur
    Hochhegger, Bruno
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (07) : 3641 - 3649