Patterns of failure after salvage head and neck surgery

被引:1
|
作者
Contrera, Kevin J. [1 ]
Mahomva, Chengetai R. [2 ]
Sharma, Bhavya K. [3 ]
Wei, Wei [2 ,4 ]
Burkey, Brian B. [2 ]
Fritz, Michael [2 ]
Ku, Jamie A. [2 ]
Lamarre, Eric D. [2 ]
Lorenz, Robert R. [2 ]
Scharpf, Joseph [2 ]
Silver, Natalie [2 ]
Sindwani, Raj [2 ]
Koyfman, Shlomo A. [5 ]
Prendes, Brandon L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Otolaryngol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Head & Neck Inst, Cleveland, OH USA
[3] Univ Missouri, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Columbia, MO USA
[4] Cleveland Clin, Lerner Res Inst, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH USA
[5] Cleveland Clin, Dept Radiat Oncol, Taussig Canc Inst, Cleveland, OH USA
关键词
Salvage; Head and neck cancer; Squamous cell carcinoma; Recurrence; Surgery; Mucosal; Race; Multimodal; Survival; Immunotherapy; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; RECURRENT HEAD; CANCER; SURVIVAL; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; PEMBROLIZUMAB; CHEMOTHERAPY; RADIOTHERAPY; KEYNOTE-048;
D O I
10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.106957
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Advancements in immunotherapy for recurrent head and neck cancer have necessitated a better understanding of salvage surgical outcomes. This study aimed to determine patterns of failure following salvage head and neck surgery. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of 280 patients who underwent salvage surgery for recurrent mucosal squamous cell carcinoma from 1997 to 2018. Cumulative incidence was calculated using the nonparametric Aalen-Johansen estimator. Time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate associated factors. Results: The 2 and 5-year cumulative incidence rates of second recurrence were 48.3 % (95 % CI 42.4-54.3) and 54.9 % (95 % CI 48.9-60.8), respectively. At 5 years, second locoregional recurrence was twice as common as distant recurrence (41.5 % [95 % CI 35.6-47.4] vs. 21.7 % [95 % CI 16.8-26.6]). The median TTR was 21.1 months (95 % CI 4.4-34.8), which varied by site (38.2 larynx/hypopharynx, 13.9 oral cavity, 8.3 sinonasal, and 7.8 oropharynx, P =.0001). The median OS was 32.1 months (95 % CI 24.1-47.6) and was worse for patients who were Black (hazard ratio [HR] 2.15, 95 % CI 1.19-3.9), current smokers (HR 2.73, 95 % CI 1.53-4.88), former smokers (HR 2.00, 95 % CI 1.19-3.35), >= 60 years of age (HR 1.41, 95 % CI 1.01-1.97), or received multimodal primary therapy (HR 1.98, 95 % CI 1.26-3.13). Conclusion: Rates of recurrence and mortality after salvage surgery were poor but worse for patients who were Black, older, smoked, had initial multimodal therapy, or had sinonasal or oropharyngeal cancers.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Salvage surgery in head and neck cancer
    van Weert, Stijn
    Leemans, C. Rene
    ORAL DISEASES, 2021, 27 (01) : 117 - 124
  • [2] Patterns of failure for recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with salvage surgery and postoperative IMRT reirradiation
    Mohamed, Abdallah S. R.
    Martin, Geoffrey V.
    Ng, Sweet Ping
    Takiar, Vinita
    Beadle, Beth M.
    Zafereo, Mark
    Garden, Adam S.
    Frank, Steven J.
    Fuller, C. David
    Gunn, G. Brandon
    Morrison, William H.
    Rosenthal, David I.
    Reddy, Jay
    Moreno, Amy
    Lee, Anna
    Phan, Jack
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 44
  • [3] Failure pattern and salvage treatment after radical treatment of head and neck cancer
    Pagh, Anja
    Grau, Cai
    Overgaard, Jens
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2016, 55 (05) : 625 - 632
  • [4] Salvage surgery after locoregional failure in head and neck carcinoma patients treated with chemoradiotherapy
    Esteller, E.
    Vega, M. C.
    Lopez, M.
    Quer, M.
    Leon, X.
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2011, 268 (02) : 295 - 301
  • [5] Comparison of salvage surgery for recurrent or residual head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
    Maruo, Takashi
    Zenda, Sadamoto
    Shinozaki, Takeshi
    Tomioka, Toshifumi
    Okano, Wataru
    Sakuraba, Minoru
    Tahara, Makoto
    Hayashi, Ryuichi
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 50 (03) : 288 - 295
  • [6] Current Approaches to Salvage Surgery for Head and Neck Cancer: A Comprehensive Review
    Mastronicola, Romina
    Le Roux, Pauline
    Casse, Aurore
    Cortese, Sophie
    Beulque, Emilie
    Perna, Marco
    Dolivet, Gilles
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [7] Locoregional failure and the risk of distant metastasis after modern radiotherapy for head and neck cancer
    Dragovic, Aleksandar F.
    Caudell, Jimmy J.
    Spencer, Sharon A.
    Carroll, William R.
    Nabell, Lisle A.
    Bonner, James A.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2013, 35 (03): : 381 - 387
  • [8] Salvage of recurrence after surgery and adjuvant therapy: A systematic review
    Zenga, Joseph
    Gross, Jennifer
    Fowler, Susan
    Chen, Jenny
    Vila, Peter
    Richmon, Jeremy D.
    Varvares, Mark A.
    Pipkorn, Patrik
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 39 (02) : 223 - 227
  • [9] Salvage surgery in head and neck cancer: Does it improve outcomes?
    Patil, Vijay Maruti
    Noronha, Vanita
    Thiagarajan, Shivakumar
    Joshi, Amit
    Chandrasekharan, Arun
    Talreja, Vikas
    Agarwal, Jaiprakash
    Ghosh-Laskar, Sarbani
    Budrukkar, Ashwini
    Juvekar, Shashikant
    Mahajan, Abhishek
    Agarwal, Archi
    Purandare, Nilendu
    Bhattacharjee, Atanu
    D'Cruz, Anil K.
    Chaturvedi, Pankaj
    Pai, Prathamesh S.
    Chaukar, Devendra
    Prabhash, Kumar
    EJSO, 2020, 46 (06): : 1052 - 1058
  • [10] Salvage surgery after local recurrence in patients with head and neck carcinoma treated with chemoradiotherapy or bioradiotherapy
    Leon, Xavier
    Agueero, Adriana
    Lopez, Montserrat
    Garcia, Jacinto
    Farre, Nuria
    Lopez-Pousa, Antonio
    Quer, Miguel
    AURIS NASUS LARYNX, 2015, 42 (02) : 145 - 149