Pharmacy practice and policy research in Türkiye: a systematic review of literature

被引:0
|
作者
Gulpinar, Gizem [1 ]
Pehlivanli, Aysel [2 ,3 ]
Babaar, Zaheer Ud-Din [4 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Fac Pharm, Dept Pharm Management, Ankara, Turkiye
[2] Baskent Univ, Fac Pharm, Dept Pharmacol, Ankara, Turkiye
[3] Baskent Univ Ankara Hosp, Clin Pharm & Drug Informat Ctr, Ankara, Turkiye
[4] Univ Huddersfield, Dept Pharm, Med & Healthcare, Huddersfield, England
关键词
Pharmacy services; health policy; prescribing; medicine access; pharmacovigilance; RATIONAL DRUG-USE; HEALTH-CARE; COMMUNITY PHARMACISTS; CLINICAL PHARMACIST; PHARMACEUTICAL POLICY; IMPACT; INTERVENTIONS; KNOWLEDGE; TURKEY; PERSPECTIVES;
D O I
10.1080/20523211.2024.2385939
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundIn recent decades, there has been an interest in clinical pharmacy practice in T & uuml;rkiye with emerging studies in this area. Despite the recent emergence of diverse pharmacy practice studies in T & uuml;rkiye, a comprehensive assessment of overall typology of studies and impact has not been conducted thus far.ObjectivesThis systematic review aims to document and assess pharmaceutical policy and practice literature published within the last 5 years in T & uuml;rkiye. The other aim is to summarise the expected impact of published studies on policy and practice research.MethodsThe systematic review was conducted according to the guidelines described in the PRISMA Statement. A comprehensive search approach, incorporating Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) queries and free-text terms was employed to locate pertinent literature related to pharmacy practice and policy in T & uuml;rkiye. The search covered the period from January 1, 2019, to January 1, 2024, and involved electronic databases including PubMed, Medline Ovid, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Springer Link, PlosOne, and BMC.ResultsIn the final grouping, 73 articles met the inclusion criteria and were selected for this review. Among the quantitative studies, majority studies were cross-sectional survey studies. Through the rigorous thematic content analysis seven research domains were developed from the selected literature: drug utilisation and rational drug use, the emerging role of pharmacist, access to medicines and generic medicines, community pharmacy practice, pharmacovigilance/adverse drug reactions, and pharmacoeconomic studies.ConclusionsThe pharmacist role is evolving; however, several challenges remain in fully realising the potential of pharmacists. These include regulatory barriers, limited public awareness of pharmacists' expanded roles, workforce capacity issues, and the need for ongoing professional development and training. Research studies are needed in the areas of generic prescribing, medicine adherence, intervention studies in community and hospital pharmacy practice, and on pharmacoeconomics and pharmacovigilance.
引用
收藏
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pharmacy provision of sexual and reproductive health commodities to young people: a systematic literature review and synthesis of the evidence
    Gonsalves, Lianne
    Hindin, Michelle J.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2017, 95 (04) : 339 - 363
  • [22] Economic evaluation of pharmacy services: a systematic review of the literature (2016-2020)
    Phimarn, Wiraphol
    Saramunee, Kritsanee
    Leelathanalerk, Areerut
    Srimongkon, Pornchanok
    Chanasopon, Suratchada
    Phumart, Panumart
    Paktipat, Pawich
    Babar, Zaheer-Ud-Din
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2023, 45 (06) : 1326 - 1348
  • [23] From policy towards pharmacy practice: A review of the intended use of ehealth in pharmacy in Scotland
    MacLure, Katie
    Stewart, Derek
    HEALTH POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 6 (03) : 279 - 285
  • [24] The achievement of public health services in pharmacy practice: A literature review
    Strand, Mark A.
    Tellers, Jackie
    Patterson, Alan
    Ross, Alex
    Palombi, Laura
    RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2016, 12 (02) : 247 - 256
  • [25] Pharmacy practice in the domain of assisted dying: A mapping review of the literature
    Woods, Phillip
    Schindel, Theresa J.
    King, Michelle A.
    Mey, Amary
    RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2020, 16 (03) : 267 - 276
  • [26] Clinical pharmacy services for tuberculosis management: a systematic review
    Iskandar, D.
    Suryanegara, F. D. A.
    van Boven, J. F. M.
    Postma, M. J.
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [27] Telework: systematic literature review and future research agenda
    Athanasiadou, Chrisalena
    Theriou, Georgios
    HELIYON, 2021, 7 (10)
  • [28] Pharmacy practice research - A call to action
    Garcia-Cardenas, Victoria
    Rossing, Charlotte Verner
    Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
    Schulz, Martin
    Tsuyuki, Ross
    Bugnon, Olivier
    Tonin, Fernanda Stumpf
    Benrimoj, Shalom, I
    RESEARCH IN SOCIAL & ADMINISTRATIVE PHARMACY, 2020, 16 (11) : 1602 - 1608
  • [29] Modular literature review: a novel systematic search and review method to support priority setting in health policy and practice
    Koivu, Annariina M.
    Hunter, Patricia J.
    Nasanen-Gilmore, Pieta
    Muthiani, Yvonne
    Isojarvi, Jaana
    Portfors, Pia
    Ashorn, Ulla
    Ashorn, Per
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [30] Modular literature review: a novel systematic search and review method to support priority setting in health policy and practice
    Annariina M. Koivu
    Patricia J. Hunter
    Pieta Näsänen-Gilmore
    Yvonne Muthiani
    Jaana Isojärvi
    Pia Pörtfors
    Ulla Ashorn
    Per Ashorn
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 21