Trustworthy AI in practice: an analysis of practitioners' needs and challenges

被引:1
|
作者
Baldassarre, Maria Teresa [1 ]
Gigante, Domenico [2 ]
Kalinowski, Marcos [3 ]
Ragone, Azzurra [1 ]
Tibido, Sara [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bari A Moro, Bari, Italy
[2] Ser&Practices Srl, Bari, Italy
[3] Pontifical Catholic Univ Rio de Janeiro PUC Rio, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[4] Scuola IMT Alti Studi Lucca, Bari, Italy
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF 2024 28TH INTERNATION CONFERENCE ON EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EASE 2024 | 2024年
关键词
Artificial Intelligence; Software Engineering; Trustworthy AI; Mixed-method Research; Systematic Investigation; Survey; Semi-structured Interview; BIAS;
D O I
10.1145/3661167.3661214
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Recently, there has been growing attention on behalf of both academic and practice communities towards the ability of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems to operate responsibly and ethically. As a result, a plethora of frameworks and guidelines have appeared to support practitioners in implementing Trustworthy AI applications (TAI). However, little research has been done to investigate whether such frameworks are being used and how. In this work, we study the vision AI practitioners have on TAI principles, how they address them, and what they would like to have - in terms of tools, knowledge, or guidelines - when they attempt to incorporate such principles into the systems they develop. Through a survey and semi-structured interviews, we systematically investigated practitioners' challenges and needs in developing TAI systems. Based on these practical findings, we highlight recommendations to help AI practitioners develop Trustworthy AI applications.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 302
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Network of AI and trustworthy: response to Simion and Kelp’s account of trustworthy AI
    Song F.
    Asian Journal of Philosophy, 2 (2):
  • [22] Traceability for Trustworthy AI: A Review of Models and Tools
    Mora-Cantallops, Marcal
    Sanchez-Alonso, Salvador
    Garcia-Barriocanal, Elena
    Sicilia, Miguel-Angel
    BIG DATA AND COGNITIVE COMPUTING, 2021, 5 (02)
  • [23] (Re)Conceptualizing trustworthy AI: A foundation for change
    Wirz, Christopher D.
    Demuth, Julie L.
    Bostrom, Ann
    Cains, Mariana G.
    Ebert-Uphoff, Imme
    Gagne II, David John
    Schumacher, Andrea
    Mcgovern, Amy
    Madlambayan, Deianna
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2025, 342
  • [24] The role of trustworthy and reliable AI for multiple sclerosis
    Werthen-Brabants, Lorin
    Dhaene, Tom
    Deschrijver, Dirk
    FRONTIERS IN DIGITAL HEALTH, 2025, 7
  • [25] An AI Harms and Governance Framework for Trustworthy AI
    Peckham, Jeremy B.
    COMPUTER, 2024, 57 (03) : 59 - 68
  • [26] Trustworthy AI Guidelines in Biomedical Decision-Making Applications: A Scoping Review
    Mora-Cantallops, Marcal
    Garcia-Barriocanal, Elena
    Sicilia, Miguel-Angel
    BIG DATA AND COGNITIVE COMPUTING, 2024, 8 (07)
  • [27] Towards a Quantitative Evaluation Framework for Trustworthy AI in Facial Analysis
    Schreiner, Annika
    Kemmerzell, Nils
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 57TH ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2024, : 7821 - 7830
  • [28] Checklist for Validating Trustworthy AI
    Han, Seung-Ho
    Choi, Ho-Jin
    2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA AND SMART COMPUTING (IEEE BIGCOMP 2022), 2022, : 391 - 394
  • [29] The analysis of architectural languages for the needs of practitioners
    Ozkaya, Mert
    SOFTWARE-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2018, 48 (05) : 985 - 1018
  • [30] Trustworthy AI for safe medicines
    Stegmann, Jens-Ulrich
    Littlebury, Rory
    Trengove, Markus
    Goetz, Lea
    Bate, Andrew
    Branson, Kim M.
    NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2023, 22 (10) : 855 - 856