Multi-Objective Optimization for Thrust Allocation of Dynamic Positioning Ship

被引:0
作者
Ding, Qiang [1 ]
Deng, Fang [1 ]
Zhang, Shuai [1 ]
Du, Zhiyu [1 ]
Yang, Hualin [1 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Elect & Mech Engn, Qingdao 266061, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
dynamic positioning; thrust allocation; multi-objective optimization; MOPSO; GENETIC ALGORITHM; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3390/jmse12071118
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Thrust allocation (TA) plays a critical role in the dynamic positioning system (DPS). The task of TA is to allocate the rotational speed and angle of each thruster to generate the generalized control forces. Most studies take TA as a single-objective optimization problem; however, TA is a multi-objective optimization problem (MOP), which needs to satisfy multiple conflicting allocation objectives simultaneously. This study proposes an improved multi-objective particle swarm optimization (IMOPSO) method to deal with the non-convex MOP of TA. The objective functions of reducing the allocation error, and minimizing the power consumption and the tear-and-wear of thrusters under physical constraints, are established and solved via MOPSO. To enhance the global seeking ability, the improved mutation strategy combined with the roulette wheel mechanism is adopted. It is shown through test data that IMOPSO converges better than multi-objective algorithms such as MOPSO and nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II). Simulations are conducted for a DP ship with two propeller-rudder combinations. The simulation results with the single-objective PSO algorithm show that the proposed IMOPSO algorithm reduces thrust allocation errors in the three directions of surge, sway, and yaw by 48.48%, 39.64%, and 15.02%, respectively, and reduces power consumption by 44.53%, which demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Development and Real-Time Performance Evaluation of Energy Management Strategy for a Dynamic Positioning Hybrid Electric Marine Vessel [J].
Bui, Truong M. N. ;
Dinh, Truong Q. ;
Marco, James ;
Watts, Chris .
ELECTRONICS, 2021, 10 (11)
[2]   A Multi-Objective Optimization of the Anchor-Last Deployment of the Marine Submersible Buoy System Based on the Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm [J].
Chen, Xiaohan ;
Liu, Bing ;
Le, Guigao .
JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 11 (07)
[3]  
Coello CAC, 2004, IEEE T EVOLUT COMPUT, V8, P256, DOI [10.1109/TEVC.2004.826067, 10.1109/tevc.2004.826067]
[4]  
De Wit C., 2009, Masters Thesis
[5]   A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II [J].
Deb, K ;
Pratap, A ;
Agarwal, S ;
Meyarivan, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 6 (02) :182-197
[6]   PSO and NNPC-based integrative control allocation for dynamic positioning ships with thruster constraints [J].
Deng, Fang ;
Zhang, Hanlin ;
Ding, Qiang ;
Zhang, Shuai ;
Du, Zhiyu ;
Yang, Hualin .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2024, 292
[7]   UKF Based Nonlinear Offset-free Model Predictive Control for Ship Dynamic Positioning Under Stochastic Disturbances [J].
Deng, Fang ;
Yang, Hua-Lin ;
Wang, Long-Jin ;
Yang, Wei-Min .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL AUTOMATION AND SYSTEMS, 2019, 17 (12) :3079-3090
[8]   ADAPTIVE-CONTROL OF NONLINEAR-SYSTEMS - A CASE-STUDY OF UNDERWATER ROBOTIC SYSTEMS [J].
FOSSEN, TI ;
SAGATUN, SI .
JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SYSTEMS, 1991, 8 (03) :393-412
[9]  
Fossen TI., 2011, HDB MARINE CRAFT HYD, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781119994138
[10]  
Guangchi X., 2015, P 2015 34 CHIN CONTR