Multi-Objective Optimization for Thrust Allocation of Dynamic Positioning Ship

被引:0
|
作者
Ding, Qiang [1 ]
Deng, Fang [1 ]
Zhang, Shuai [1 ]
Du, Zhiyu [1 ]
Yang, Hualin [1 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Elect & Mech Engn, Qingdao 266061, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
dynamic positioning; thrust allocation; multi-objective optimization; MOPSO; GENETIC ALGORITHM; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3390/jmse12071118
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Thrust allocation (TA) plays a critical role in the dynamic positioning system (DPS). The task of TA is to allocate the rotational speed and angle of each thruster to generate the generalized control forces. Most studies take TA as a single-objective optimization problem; however, TA is a multi-objective optimization problem (MOP), which needs to satisfy multiple conflicting allocation objectives simultaneously. This study proposes an improved multi-objective particle swarm optimization (IMOPSO) method to deal with the non-convex MOP of TA. The objective functions of reducing the allocation error, and minimizing the power consumption and the tear-and-wear of thrusters under physical constraints, are established and solved via MOPSO. To enhance the global seeking ability, the improved mutation strategy combined with the roulette wheel mechanism is adopted. It is shown through test data that IMOPSO converges better than multi-objective algorithms such as MOPSO and nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II). Simulations are conducted for a DP ship with two propeller-rudder combinations. The simulation results with the single-objective PSO algorithm show that the proposed IMOPSO algorithm reduces thrust allocation errors in the three directions of surge, sway, and yaw by 48.48%, 39.64%, and 15.02%, respectively, and reduces power consumption by 44.53%, which demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Research on Thrust Allocation of Dynamic Positioning Ship with Cycloidal Propeller
    Fu, Mingyu
    Sun, Jialin
    Wang, Duansong
    2018 37TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE (CCC), 2018, : 620 - 624
  • [2] Thrust Allocation of Ship Dynamic Positioning System Under Extreme Sea Environment
    Wang, Yuanbin
    Lu, Haifeng
    MACHINERY, MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENERGY ENGINEERING, 2015, : 41 - 50
  • [3] Study on Stabilizing Power of Dynamic Positioning Ship Based on Thrust Allocation
    Ding Fuguang
    Yang Dong
    Huang Wei
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHATRONICS AND AUTOMATION, 2016, : 1350 - 1355
  • [4] Research on nonlinear optimization of thrust allocation in dynamic positioning system
    Liu, C.-D. (changde001@126.com), 1600, China Ship Scientific Research Center (17): : 1403 - 1410
  • [5] Convex optimization of thrust allocation in a dynamic positioning simulation system
    Zalewski, Pawel
    SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS OF THE MARITIME UNIVERSITY OF SZCZECIN-ZESZYTY NAUKOWE AKADEMII MORSKIEJ W SZCZECINIE, 2016, 48 (120): : 58 - 62
  • [6] Thrust Allocation and Management for Dynamic Positioning Ship with Azimuth Thrusters
    Wei, Yushi
    Fu, Mingyu
    Ning, Jipeng
    Sun, Xingyan
    SENSORS, MEASUREMENT AND INTELLIGENT MATERIALS, PTS 1-4, 2013, 303-306 : 1224 - 1227
  • [7] Dynamic multiobjective optimization for thrust allocation in ship application
    Li Xuebin
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2020, 218 (218)
  • [8] Fault Grouping Bias Strategy of Thrust Allocation for Dynamic Positioning Ship
    Ding, Fuguang
    Zhang, Junfeng
    Wang, Yuanhui
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHATRONICS AND AUTOMATION (IEEE ICMA 2021), 2021, : 548 - 549
  • [9] Design and Implementation of Pseudo-Inverse Thrust Allocation Algorithm for Ship Dynamic Positioning
    Ye, Baoyu
    Xiong, Jianbin
    Wang, Qinruo
    Luo, Yan
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 (08): : 16830 - 16837
  • [10] Multi-Agent Chaos Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm of Thrust Allocation for dynamic positioning vessels
    Xu Guang-chi
    Zhao Da-wei
    Zhang Kai-wei
    Ge Jing-hua
    2015 34TH CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE (CCC), 2015, : 2389 - 2396