Price spillovers and interdependences in China's agricultural commodity futures market: Evidence from the US-China trade dispute

被引:2
作者
Chen, Xiangyu [1 ]
Tongurai, Jittima [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Int Business & Econ, Sch Banking & Finance, 10 Huixin East St, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Business Adm, 2-1 Rokkodai, Nada, Kobe 6578501, Japan
关键词
Trade dispute; Dynamic connectedness; Agricultural commodities; Futures market; PRECIOUS METALS; CRUDE-OIL; UNCERTAINTY; INDEX; FINANCIALIZATION; SPECULATION; NETWORK; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.iref.2024.103579
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We examine the effects of the US-China trade dispute on price spillovers and interdependencies among the ten most liquid agricultural futures contracts traded on China's commodity exchanges by employing the time-varying connectedness framework modified by Antonakakis, Chatziantoniou, and Gabauer (2020). We find that the overall market frictions increase modestly due to the clustering of mixed informational disturbances caused by the trade dispute. This lowers the gross spillovers in the entire asset system by reducing the efficiency of general price signal transmission. Notably, subsidiary products of rapeseed and soybean contribute the most to the total and net directional spillovers in the whole market, acting as shock transmitters before the trade dispute. The RBD palm market gains a dominant role as a shock transmitter during the trade dispute and its role strengthens further after the trade agreement was reached. Additionally, the average intensity of pairwise spillovers declines considerably during the trade dispute, suggesting weakening asset interconnectedness. The responsiveness of shock transmission channels to the trade dispute impacts is found to vary across industrial chains and the presence of delayed economic effects is detected in the structural changes of market interdependences.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] How does output price risk influence agricultural energy consumption? Evidence from China's lychee market
    Pan, Zheng
    Zheng, Xuyun
    Fang, Yuying
    Li, Xiaomin
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2024,
  • [42] Exploring China's Digitalization of Public Diplomacy on Weibo and Twitter: A Case Study of the US-China Trade War
    Huang, Zhao Alexandre
    Wang, Rui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2021, 15 : 1912 - 1939
  • [43] Do commodity futures have a steering effect on the spot stock market in China? New evidence from volatility forecasting
    Lu, Fei
    Ma, Feng
    Bouri, Elie
    Liao, Yin
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 94
  • [44] The role of price risk in China's agricultural and fisheries exports to the US
    Zhang, Dengjun
    Zheng, Yuqing
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2016, 48 (41) : 3944 - 3960
  • [45] The nexus between real exchange rate misalignment and US-China trade: evidence from post RMB regimes
    Abbas, Shah
    Lu Xiaoyong
    Qiu Minrong
    Chen Ai
    Gui Peng
    TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS REVIEW, 2022, 14 (04) : 402 - 417
  • [46] Price discovery and volatility spillover: an empirical evidence from spot and futures agricultural commodity markets in India
    Manogna, R. L.
    Mishra, Aswini Kumar
    JOURNAL OF AGRIBUSINESS IN DEVELOPING AND EMERGING ECONOMIES, 2020, 10 (04) : 447 - 473
  • [47] Uncovering the Sino-US Dynamic Risk Spillovers Effects: Evidence From Agricultural Futures Markets
    Zhu, Han-Yu
    Dai, Peng-Fei
    Zhou, Wei-Xing
    JOURNAL OF FUTURES MARKETS, 2024, 44 (12) : 1888 - 1910
  • [48] Dynamic Spillovers Between International Crude Oil Market and China's Commodity Sectors: Evidence From Time-Frequency Perspective of Stochastic Volatility
    Li, Zhenghui
    Su, Yaya
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2020, 8 (08):
  • [49] Trade development and agricultural productivity change: Evidence from China
    Ma, Yuan
    Bruemmer, Bernhard
    Yu, Xiaohua
    WORLD ECONOMY, 2023, 46 (10) : 3136 - 3153
  • [50] Maximum Residue Limits and Agricultural Trade: Evidence from China
    Zhang, Siqi
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (08)