Price spillovers and interdependences in China's agricultural commodity futures market: Evidence from the US-China trade dispute

被引:2
作者
Chen, Xiangyu [1 ]
Tongurai, Jittima [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Int Business & Econ, Sch Banking & Finance, 10 Huixin East St, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Business Adm, 2-1 Rokkodai, Nada, Kobe 6578501, Japan
关键词
Trade dispute; Dynamic connectedness; Agricultural commodities; Futures market; PRECIOUS METALS; CRUDE-OIL; UNCERTAINTY; INDEX; FINANCIALIZATION; SPECULATION; NETWORK; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.iref.2024.103579
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We examine the effects of the US-China trade dispute on price spillovers and interdependencies among the ten most liquid agricultural futures contracts traded on China's commodity exchanges by employing the time-varying connectedness framework modified by Antonakakis, Chatziantoniou, and Gabauer (2020). We find that the overall market frictions increase modestly due to the clustering of mixed informational disturbances caused by the trade dispute. This lowers the gross spillovers in the entire asset system by reducing the efficiency of general price signal transmission. Notably, subsidiary products of rapeseed and soybean contribute the most to the total and net directional spillovers in the whole market, acting as shock transmitters before the trade dispute. The RBD palm market gains a dominant role as a shock transmitter during the trade dispute and its role strengthens further after the trade agreement was reached. Additionally, the average intensity of pairwise spillovers declines considerably during the trade dispute, suggesting weakening asset interconnectedness. The responsiveness of shock transmission channels to the trade dispute impacts is found to vary across industrial chains and the presence of delayed economic effects is detected in the structural changes of market interdependences.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Trade destruction and deflection effects of US-China trade frictions on China's tariff-targeted products
    Shen, Guobing
    Wang, Peijie
    Xu, Yuanhan
    WORLD ECONOMY, 2021, 44 (07) : 2076 - 2106
  • [32] Tariff uncertainty and firm innovation: Evidence from the US-China Permanent Normal Trade Relation
    Chen, Tao
    Gao, Huasheng
    Wang, Yuxi
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL FINANCE, 2021, 62 : 12 - 27
  • [33] Spillovers and interdependency across base metals: Evidence from China's futures and spot markets
    Chen, Xiangyu
    Tongurai, Jittima
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2022, 75
  • [34] Risk spillovers and time-varying links between international oil and China's commodity futures markets: Fresh evidence from the higher-order moments
    Cui, Jinxin
    Maghyereh, Aktham
    Goh, Mark
    Zou, Huiwen
    ENERGY, 2022, 238
  • [35] Tracing the Footprint of Knowledge Spillover: Evidence From US-China Collaboration in Nanotechnology
    Tang, Li
    Hu, Guangyuan
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 64 (09): : 1791 - 1801
  • [36] Are R&D-intensive firms more resilient to trade shocks? Evidence from the US-China trade war
    Kim, Kenneth A.
    Xie, Hongjun
    Zheng, Xiaojia
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MONEY AND FINANCE, 2024, 149
  • [37] Have cross-category spillovers of economic policy uncertainty changed during the US-China trade war?
    Nong, Huifu
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN ECONOMICS, 2021, 74
  • [38] Price bubbles in agricultural commodity markets and contributing factors: evidence for corn and soybeans in China
    Mao, Qianqian
    Ren, Yanjun
    Loy, Jens-Peter
    CHINA AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2021, 13 (01) : 91 - 122
  • [39] A good hedge or safe haven? The hedging ability of China's commodity futures market under extreme market conditions
    Huang, Huilian
    Xiong, Tao
    JOURNAL OF FUTURES MARKETS, 2023, 43 (07) : 968 - 1035
  • [40] What drives risk in China's soybean futures market? Evidence from a flexible GARCH-MIDAS model
    Wang, Xinyu
    Zhang, Lele
    Cheng, Qiuying
    Shi, Song
    Niu, Huawei
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2022, 25 (01) : 454 - 475