Price spillovers and interdependences in China's agricultural commodity futures market: Evidence from the US-China trade dispute

被引:2
作者
Chen, Xiangyu [1 ]
Tongurai, Jittima [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Int Business & Econ, Sch Banking & Finance, 10 Huixin East St, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Business Adm, 2-1 Rokkodai, Nada, Kobe 6578501, Japan
关键词
Trade dispute; Dynamic connectedness; Agricultural commodities; Futures market; PRECIOUS METALS; CRUDE-OIL; UNCERTAINTY; INDEX; FINANCIALIZATION; SPECULATION; NETWORK; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.iref.2024.103579
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We examine the effects of the US-China trade dispute on price spillovers and interdependencies among the ten most liquid agricultural futures contracts traded on China's commodity exchanges by employing the time-varying connectedness framework modified by Antonakakis, Chatziantoniou, and Gabauer (2020). We find that the overall market frictions increase modestly due to the clustering of mixed informational disturbances caused by the trade dispute. This lowers the gross spillovers in the entire asset system by reducing the efficiency of general price signal transmission. Notably, subsidiary products of rapeseed and soybean contribute the most to the total and net directional spillovers in the whole market, acting as shock transmitters before the trade dispute. The RBD palm market gains a dominant role as a shock transmitter during the trade dispute and its role strengthens further after the trade agreement was reached. Additionally, the average intensity of pairwise spillovers declines considerably during the trade dispute, suggesting weakening asset interconnectedness. The responsiveness of shock transmission channels to the trade dispute impacts is found to vary across industrial chains and the presence of delayed economic effects is detected in the structural changes of market interdependences.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   COVID-19 pandemic and economic policy uncertainty regimes affect commodity market volatility [J].
Ahmed, Maruf Yakubu ;
Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2021, 74
[2]   Managing natural resource prices in a geopolitical risk environment [J].
Aloui, Donia ;
Benkraiem, Ramzi ;
Guesmi, Khaled ;
Mzoughi, Hela .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2023, 83
[3]   Geopolitical risk and commodity future returns: Fresh insights from dynamic copula conditional value-at-risk approach [J].
Aloui, Riadh ;
Ben Jabeur, Sami ;
Rezgui, Hichem ;
Ben Arfi, Wissal .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2023, 85
[4]   Refined Measures of Dynamic Connectedness based on Time-Varying Parameter Vector Autoregressions [J].
Antonakakis, Nikolaos ;
Chatziantoniou, Ioannis ;
Gabauer, David .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 13 (04)
[5]   The impact of COVID-19 news, panic and media coverage on the oil and gold prices: An ARDL approach [J].
Atri, Hanen ;
Kouki, Saoussen ;
Gallali, Mohamed imen .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2021, 72
[6]   COVID-19 and stock market volatility: An industry level analysis [J].
Baek, Seungho ;
Mohanty, Sunil K. ;
Glambosky, Mina .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 37
[7]   Spillover network of commodity uncertainties [J].
Balli, Faruk ;
Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr ;
Shahzad, Syed Jawad Hussain ;
de Bruin, Anne .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 81 :914-927
[8]   Volatility spillovers in commodity markets: A large t-vector autoregressive approach [J].
Barbaglia, Luca ;
Croux, Christophe ;
Wilms, Ines .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 85
[9]   Which precious metals spill over on which, when and why? Some evidence [J].
Batten, Jonathan A. ;
Ciner, Cetin ;
Lucey, Brian M. .
APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2015, 22 (06) :466-473
[10]   Volatility transmission in agricultural futures markets [J].
Beckmann, Joscha ;
Czudaj, Robert .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2014, 36 :541-546