Complication Rates of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Oncologic Versus Non-Oncologic Patients

被引:0
|
作者
Dominikus, Huber [1 ]
Veronika, Weiler [1 ]
Maximilian, J. Mair
Martina, Spalt [4 ]
Pavla, Krotka [2 ]
Christoph, Krall [2 ]
Christian, Kinstner [3 ]
Christian, Loewe [3 ]
Rupert, Bartsch [1 ]
Christoph, Minichsdorfer [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Med 1, Div Oncol, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Med Univ Vienna, Ctr Med Data Sci, Vienna, Austria
[3] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Radiol & Image Guided Therapy, Div Cardiovasc & Intervent Radiol, Vienna, Austria
[4] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Med 1, Vienna, Austria
关键词
Peripherally inserted central catheter; Catheter related blood stream infection; Catheter related thrombosis; PICC; related adverse events; Cancer; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERS; BLOOD-STREAM INFECTIONS; EVIDENCE-BASED GUIDELINES; CANCER-PATIENTS; RISK-FACTORS; NHS HOSPITALS; THROMBOSIS; PICC; CHEMOTHERAPY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151681
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: Peripherally inserted central catheters are commonly used in cancer patients and provide vascular access for the administration of chemotherapy, antibiotics, or parenteral nutrition. Besides many advantages, they represent a source of possible complications such as catheter related blood stream infection, catheter occlusion, or thrombosis. In this study, the catheter-related complication rate between oncologic and non-oncologic patients was compared. Methods: This retrospective cohort-study included 411 patients who underwent their first catheter placement at the Vienna General Hospital-Medical University of Vienna from January 2013 to June 2018. Patient demographics and catheter-related parameters were collected and statistically analyzed using a competing risk model. Results: Mean catheter dwell time was 27.75 days. The overall complication rate was 7.54% (2.72 per 1000 catheter days). Underlying malignant disease (hazard ratio: 0.351, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.133-0.929, P = .035) and chemotherapy administration (hazard ratio: 2.837, 95% CI: 1.088-7.394, P = .033) were significantly associated with the occurrence of any kind of complication. Catheter related blood stream infection was observed among 11 (2.68%) patients and again significantly associated with chemotherapy administration (hazard ratio: 4.545, 95% CI: 1.178-17.539; P = .028). Thrombosis was found in 7 (1.70%) patients and occlusion in 13 (3.16%) cases. Conclusions and implications for nursing practice: Choice of venous access is an interdisciplinary decision with emphasis on patient participation. In oncologic patients, our data suggests that the benefits of peripherally inserted central catheters regarding costs, invasiveness, and accessibility might be outweighed by the higher rate of complications associated with the device. This becomes even more important in a community care setting, where standardized handling procedures and patient education play a pivotal role in device safety. (c) 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Implantable Port Catheters versus Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters for Cancer Patients Requiring Chemotherapy: An RCT-Based Meta-Analysis
    Qiu, Juan
    Huang, Shanshan
    Wen, Pei
    Jiang, Yingxin
    Luo, Zan
    Zhang, Wenxiong
    Wen, Jianyun
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2025, 16 (04): : 1127 - 1136
  • [42] Evaluation of peripherally inserted central catheters in a pediatric population
    Baudin, G.
    Occelli, A.
    Boyer, C.
    Geoffray, A.
    Chevallier, P.
    ARCHIVES DE PEDIATRIE, 2013, 20 (10): : 1089 - 1095
  • [43] Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Pediatric Patients: To Repair or Not Repair
    Ralph Gnannt
    Premal Patel
    Michael Temple
    Yahya Al Brashdi
    Joao Amaral
    Dimitri Parra
    Vanessa Rea
    Derek Stephens
    Bairbre Connolly
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2017, 40 : 845 - 851
  • [44] Non-oncologic Indications for Male Fertility Preservation
    Yang, Heiko
    Ramstein, Joris
    Smith, James
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2019, 20 (09)
  • [45] Safety of peripherally inserted central catheters during pregnancy: a retrospective study
    Jacques, Laura
    Foeller, Megan
    Farez, Rahmouna
    Kaljo, Kristina
    Nugent, Melodee
    Simpson, Pippa
    Klatt, Timothy
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2018, 31 (09) : 1166 - 1170
  • [46] Efficacy and safety of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in acute cardiac care management
    Poletti, Fabrizio
    Coccino, Claudio
    Monolo, Davide
    Crespi, Paolo
    Ciccioli, Giorgio
    Cordio, Giuseppe
    Seveso, Giovanni
    De Servi, Stefano
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS, 2018, 19 (05) : 455 - 460
  • [47] Peripherally inserted central venous catheters for patients with hematological malignancies
    C. Harter
    G. Egerer
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2004, 12 : 815 - 816
  • [48] Peripherally inserted central venous catheters for patients with hematological malignancies
    Harter, C
    Egerer, G
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2004, 12 (11) : 815 - 816
  • [49] Peripherally inserted central venous catheters and central venous catheters related thrombosis in post-critical patients
    Bonizzoli, Manuela
    Batacchi, Stefano
    Cianchi, Giovanni
    Zagli, Giovanni
    Lapi, Francesco
    Tucci, Valentina
    Martini, Giacomo
    Di Valvasone, Simona
    Peris, Adriano
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 37 (02) : 284 - 289
  • [50] A comparison of Broviac® and peripherally inserted central catheters in children with intestinal failure
    Blotte, Carolina
    Styers, Jennifer
    Zhu, Hong
    Channabasappa, Nandini
    Piper, Hannah G.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2017, 52 (05) : 768 - 771