Complication Rates of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Oncologic Versus Non-Oncologic Patients

被引:0
|
作者
Dominikus, Huber [1 ]
Veronika, Weiler [1 ]
Maximilian, J. Mair
Martina, Spalt [4 ]
Pavla, Krotka [2 ]
Christoph, Krall [2 ]
Christian, Kinstner [3 ]
Christian, Loewe [3 ]
Rupert, Bartsch [1 ]
Christoph, Minichsdorfer [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Med 1, Div Oncol, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Med Univ Vienna, Ctr Med Data Sci, Vienna, Austria
[3] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Radiol & Image Guided Therapy, Div Cardiovasc & Intervent Radiol, Vienna, Austria
[4] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Med 1, Vienna, Austria
关键词
Peripherally inserted central catheter; Catheter related blood stream infection; Catheter related thrombosis; PICC; related adverse events; Cancer; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERS; BLOOD-STREAM INFECTIONS; EVIDENCE-BASED GUIDELINES; CANCER-PATIENTS; RISK-FACTORS; NHS HOSPITALS; THROMBOSIS; PICC; CHEMOTHERAPY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151681
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: Peripherally inserted central catheters are commonly used in cancer patients and provide vascular access for the administration of chemotherapy, antibiotics, or parenteral nutrition. Besides many advantages, they represent a source of possible complications such as catheter related blood stream infection, catheter occlusion, or thrombosis. In this study, the catheter-related complication rate between oncologic and non-oncologic patients was compared. Methods: This retrospective cohort-study included 411 patients who underwent their first catheter placement at the Vienna General Hospital-Medical University of Vienna from January 2013 to June 2018. Patient demographics and catheter-related parameters were collected and statistically analyzed using a competing risk model. Results: Mean catheter dwell time was 27.75 days. The overall complication rate was 7.54% (2.72 per 1000 catheter days). Underlying malignant disease (hazard ratio: 0.351, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.133-0.929, P = .035) and chemotherapy administration (hazard ratio: 2.837, 95% CI: 1.088-7.394, P = .033) were significantly associated with the occurrence of any kind of complication. Catheter related blood stream infection was observed among 11 (2.68%) patients and again significantly associated with chemotherapy administration (hazard ratio: 4.545, 95% CI: 1.178-17.539; P = .028). Thrombosis was found in 7 (1.70%) patients and occlusion in 13 (3.16%) cases. Conclusions and implications for nursing practice: Choice of venous access is an interdisciplinary decision with emphasis on patient participation. In oncologic patients, our data suggests that the benefits of peripherally inserted central catheters regarding costs, invasiveness, and accessibility might be outweighed by the higher rate of complications associated with the device. This becomes even more important in a community care setting, where standardized handling procedures and patient education play a pivotal role in device safety. (c) 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Antithrombogenic peripherally inserted central catheters: overview of efficacy and safety
    Ullman, Amanda J.
    Bulmer, AndreW. C.
    Dargaville, Tim R.
    Rickard, Claire M.
    Chopra, Vineet
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2019, 16 (01) : 25 - 33
  • [32] Right heart thrombus in transit and peripherally inserted central catheters
    Hussain, Rezwan N.
    Mandal, Amit K. J.
    Li, Nick
    El Kafsi, Jihene
    Sioftanos, Anastasis
    Missouris, Constantinos G.
    THROMBOSIS JOURNAL, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [33] The Problem With Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters
    Chopra, Vineet
    Flanders, Scott A.
    Saint, Sanjay
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 308 (15): : 1527 - 1528
  • [34] Complications associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in paediatric cardiac patients
    Patel, Jay R.
    Vellore Govardhan, Shilpa
    Anton-Martin, Pilar
    CARDIOLOGY IN THE YOUNG, 2023, 33 (01) : 79 - 85
  • [35] The role of a surveillance programme for introducing peripherally inserted central catheters: a 2-year observational study in an academic hospital
    Lo Priore, Elia
    Fliedner, Monika
    Heverhagen, Johannes T.
    Novak, Urban
    Marschall, Jonas
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2017, 147
  • [36] Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Patients with Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters
    Lobo, Bob L.
    Vaidean, Georgeta
    Broyles, Joyce
    Reaves, Anne B.
    Shorr, Ronald I.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2009, 4 (07) : 417 - 422
  • [37] Multifactor Analysis of Malposition of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Patients With Cancer
    Li, Xuying
    Wang, Honghong
    Chen, Yongyi
    Yuan, Zhong
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2015, 19 (04) : E70 - E73
  • [38] Feasibility and safety of peripherally inserted central catheters in hospitalized elderly patients
    Kim, Sang Hee
    Kim, Su Hong
    JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2022, 70 (03): : 155 - 163
  • [39] Complications of implanted port catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters in chemotherapy-treated cancer patients: A meta-analysis
    Sun, Yuanli
    Wu, Xiangchun
    ADVANCES IN CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2023, 32 (05): : 523 - 532
  • [40] The risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in ambulant cancer patients
    Jones, Daniel
    Wismayer, Kurt
    Bozas, George
    Palmer, June
    Elliott, Mandi
    Maraveyas, Anthony
    THROMBOSIS JOURNAL, 2017, 15