Complication Rates of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Oncologic Versus Non-Oncologic Patients

被引:0
|
作者
Dominikus, Huber [1 ]
Veronika, Weiler [1 ]
Maximilian, J. Mair
Martina, Spalt [4 ]
Pavla, Krotka [2 ]
Christoph, Krall [2 ]
Christian, Kinstner [3 ]
Christian, Loewe [3 ]
Rupert, Bartsch [1 ]
Christoph, Minichsdorfer [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Med 1, Div Oncol, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Med Univ Vienna, Ctr Med Data Sci, Vienna, Austria
[3] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Radiol & Image Guided Therapy, Div Cardiovasc & Intervent Radiol, Vienna, Austria
[4] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Med 1, Vienna, Austria
关键词
Peripherally inserted central catheter; Catheter related blood stream infection; Catheter related thrombosis; PICC; related adverse events; Cancer; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERS; BLOOD-STREAM INFECTIONS; EVIDENCE-BASED GUIDELINES; CANCER-PATIENTS; RISK-FACTORS; NHS HOSPITALS; THROMBOSIS; PICC; CHEMOTHERAPY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151681
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: Peripherally inserted central catheters are commonly used in cancer patients and provide vascular access for the administration of chemotherapy, antibiotics, or parenteral nutrition. Besides many advantages, they represent a source of possible complications such as catheter related blood stream infection, catheter occlusion, or thrombosis. In this study, the catheter-related complication rate between oncologic and non-oncologic patients was compared. Methods: This retrospective cohort-study included 411 patients who underwent their first catheter placement at the Vienna General Hospital-Medical University of Vienna from January 2013 to June 2018. Patient demographics and catheter-related parameters were collected and statistically analyzed using a competing risk model. Results: Mean catheter dwell time was 27.75 days. The overall complication rate was 7.54% (2.72 per 1000 catheter days). Underlying malignant disease (hazard ratio: 0.351, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.133-0.929, P = .035) and chemotherapy administration (hazard ratio: 2.837, 95% CI: 1.088-7.394, P = .033) were significantly associated with the occurrence of any kind of complication. Catheter related blood stream infection was observed among 11 (2.68%) patients and again significantly associated with chemotherapy administration (hazard ratio: 4.545, 95% CI: 1.178-17.539; P = .028). Thrombosis was found in 7 (1.70%) patients and occlusion in 13 (3.16%) cases. Conclusions and implications for nursing practice: Choice of venous access is an interdisciplinary decision with emphasis on patient participation. In oncologic patients, our data suggests that the benefits of peripherally inserted central catheters regarding costs, invasiveness, and accessibility might be outweighed by the higher rate of complications associated with the device. This becomes even more important in a community care setting, where standardized handling procedures and patient education play a pivotal role in device safety. (c) 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Complication Rates of Central Venous Catheters Versus Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters in Pediatric Patients*
    Noonan, Patrick J.
    Hanson, Sheila J.
    Simpson, Pippa M.
    Dasgupta, Mahua
    Petersen, Tara L.
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 19 (12) : 1097 - 1105
  • [2] Complication rates among peripherally inserted central venous catheters and centrally inserted central catheters in the medical intensive care unit
    Nolan, Matthew E.
    Yadav, Hemang
    Cawcutt, Kelly A.
    Cartin-Ceba, Rodrigo
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 31 (01) : 238 - 242
  • [3] Comparison of complication rates and incidences associated with different peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) in patients with hematological malignancies: a retrospective cohort study
    Scrivens, Nicholas
    Sabri, Elham
    Bredeson, Christopher
    McDiarmid, Sheryl
    LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA, 2020, 61 (01) : 156 - 164
  • [4] Complication rates of peripherally inserted central catheters vs implanted ports in patients receiving systemic anticancer therapy: A retrospective cohort study
    Rieger, Max J.
    Schenkel, Xenia
    Dedic, Ivona
    Brunn, Tadeusz
    Gnannt, Ralph
    Hofmann, Michael
    de Rougemont, Olivier
    Stolz, Sebastian M.
    Rosler, Wiebke
    Studt, Jan-Dirk
    Balabanov, Stefan
    Wicki, Andreas
    Lorch, Anja
    Manz, Markus G.
    Schwotzer, Rahel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2023, 153 (07) : 1397 - 1405
  • [5] Peripherally inserted central catheters versus implantable port catheters for cancer patients: a meta-analysis
    Lin, Li
    Li, Wei
    Chen, Chen
    Wei, Anhua
    Liu, Yu
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [6] Comparison of Complication Rates Between Umbilical and Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters in Newborns
    Arnts, Inge Johanna Jacoba
    Bullens, Lauren Maria
    Groenewoud, Joannes Martinus Maria
    Liem, Kian Djien
    JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2014, 43 (02): : 205 - 215
  • [7] Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters
    Bourgeois, Fabienne C.
    Lamagna, Paula
    Chiang, Vincent W.
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2011, 27 (06) : 556 - 561
  • [8] Non-central peripherally inserted central catheters in neonatal intensive care: complication rates and longevity of catheters relative to tip position
    Goldwasser, Bernard
    Baia, Catalina
    Kim, Mimi
    Taragin, Benjamin H.
    Angert, Robert M.
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2017, 47 (12) : 1676 - 1681
  • [9] Non-central peripherally inserted central catheters in neonatal intensive care: complication rates and longevity of catheters relative to tip position
    Bernard Goldwasser
    Catalina Baia
    Mimi Kim
    Benjamin H. Taragin
    Robert M. Angert
    Pediatric Radiology, 2017, 47 : 1676 - 1681
  • [10] Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Pediatric Patients: To Repair or Not Repair
    Gnannt, Ralph
    Patel, Premal
    Temple, Michael
    Al Brashdi, Yahya
    Amaral, Joao
    Parra, Dimitri
    Rea, Vanessa
    Stephens, Derek
    Connolly, Bairbre
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 40 (06) : 845 - 851