Impact of state-level labour law reforms in India: an empirical analysis

被引:0
作者
Debroy, Bibek [1 ]
De, Supriyo [2 ]
Aditya, Chirag [1 ]
Dudani, Chirag [1 ]
Jayasimha, K. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Econ Advisory Council Prime Minister EACPM, New Delhi, India
[2] Natl Inst Publ Finance & Policy, New Delhi, India
关键词
India reforms; labour law; employment; capital-labour ratio; contract workers; firm size; PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH; PANEL-DATA; REGULATIONS; TESTS; SPECIFICATION; DIFFERENCE; EMPLOYMENT; INFERENCE;
D O I
10.1080/13547860.2024.2400012
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The impact of Indian state labour law reforms on employment, output, new industrial units, investment and size of industrial units is examined from 2000-01 to 2017-18. States with inflexible labour laws had lower growth of large industrial units and regular employment. Contract worker hiring spiked in firms with 301-500 workers in both flexible and inflexible states. Capital growth was higher than growth of workers in all state categories. Rajasthan, the first state to carry out additional reforms in 2014, had good performance. Regressions carried out to control for factors that impact employment other than labour laws indicate that: (i) reforms had a positive impact on employment; (ii) good infrastructure, reduction in industrial disputes, low crime and better education resulted in significant employment generation. Difference-in-differences estimates show that post-reform, employment, fixed capital, and output were higher for flexible labour law states, when compared to inflexible labour law states.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Ahluwalia R., 2018, SIPA Working Paper No. 2018 - 02
[2]   Are all labor regulations equal? Evidence from Indian manufacturing [J].
Ahsan, Ahmad ;
Pages, Carmen .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 2009, 37 (01) :62-75
[3]   SOME TESTS OF SPECIFICATION FOR PANEL DATA - MONTE-CARLO EVIDENCE AND AN APPLICATION TO EMPLOYMENT EQUATIONS [J].
ARELLANO, M ;
BOND, S .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1991, 58 (02) :277-297
[4]   Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes [J].
Bai, JS ;
Perron, P .
ECONOMETRICA, 1998, 66 (01) :47-78
[5]  
Baltagi BH., 2008, Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-53953-5
[6]   Can labor regulation hinder economic performance? Evidence from India [J].
Besley, T ;
Burgess, R .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 119 (01) :91-134
[7]  
Bhandari Anup Kumar, 2016, Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, V21, P63
[8]  
Bhattacharjea A., 2006, INDIAN J LABOUR ECON, V49, P211
[9]   Labour market flexibility in Indian manufacturing: A critical survey of the literature [J].
Bhattacharjea, Aditya .
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR REVIEW, 2021, 160 (02) :197-217
[10]  
Bond S., 2000, Econometric Reviews, V19, P321, DOI DOI 10.1080/07474930008800475