Association of Pre-PCI Blood Pressure and No-Reflow in Patients with Acute ST-Elevation Coronary Infarction

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Xiaobo [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Chen [1 ]
Lei, Li [1 ]
Liu, Xuewei [3 ]
Chen, Yejia [1 ]
Wang, Yutian [1 ]
Qiu, Shifeng [1 ]
Xiu, Jiancheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Normal Univ, Xiangdong Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Liling, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Southern Med Univ, Dongguan Peoples Hosp, Affiliated Hosp 10, Dongguan, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
STEMI (ST-elevation acute coronary infarction); no-reflow; SBP(Systolic blood pressure); DBP(Diastolic blood pressure); ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; SEGMENT ELEVATION; CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS; HEART-FAILURE; TASK-FORCE; RISK; FLOW; GUIDELINES; ISCHEMIA; INTERVENTION;
D O I
10.5334/gh.1309
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Previous studies have established blood pressure (BP) as a pivotal factor influencing no-reflow following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-elevation acute coronary infarction (STEMI). However, no relevant study has been conducted to investigate the optimal range of BP associated with the lowest risk of no-reflow among STEMI patients so far. Therefore, our objective was to evaluate the association between pre-PCI BP and the occurrence of no-reflow in patients with STEMI. Method: We included 1025 STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI. The BP pre-PCI was categorized into 20-mmHg increments. Logistic models were employed to assess the association of no-reflow with systolic blood pressure (SBP) or diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Three sensitivity analyses were conducted to further confirm the robustness of the association between blood pressure and no-reflow. Results: SBP or DBP exhibited a U-shaped curve association with no-reflow. No-reflow was higher in patients with lower SBP (<100 mmHg) (adjusted hazard ratio (OR) 3.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.84,7.21; p < 0.001) and lower DBP (<60 mmHg) (OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.63,6.49; p < 0.001) [reference: 120 <= SBP <140; 80 <= DBP <100 mmHg], respectively. Furthermore, no-reflow was higher in patients with higher SBP (>= 160 mmHg) (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.27,3.36; p = 0.003) and DBP (>= 100 mmHg) (OR 3.36, 95% CI 2.07,5.46; p < 0.001), respectively. The results of sensitivity analyses were consistent with the above findings. Conclusion: Maintaining a pre-PCI SBP within the range of 120 to 140 mmHg and a DBP within the range of 80 to 100 mmHg may be confer benefits to patients with STEMI in no-reflow.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multilayer longitudinal strain can help predict the development of no-reflow in patients with acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation
    Atici, Adem
    Barman, Hasan Ali
    Erturk, Emre
    Baycan, Omer Faruk
    Fidan, Serdar
    Demirel, Koray Celal
    Asoglu, Ramazan
    Demir, Koray
    Ozturk, Fatih
    Elitok, Ali
    Okuyan, Erugrul
    Sahin, Irfan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2019, 35 (10) : 1811 - 1821
  • [22] Predictor of No-Reflow in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Gobut, Ozden Seckin
    Unlu, Serkan
    ANGIOLOGY, 2024, 75 (07) : 696 - 697
  • [23] Risk Factors for No-Reflow in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Case-Control Study
    Yu, Ying
    Wu, Yongquan
    Wu, Xianyi
    Wang, Jinwen
    Wang, Changhua
    CARDIOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2022, 2022
  • [24] NO-REFLOW PHENOMENON DURING PRIMARY PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION DUE TO MASSIVE CORONARY THROMBOSIS. PATHOGENESIS AND PREDICTORS OF NO-REFLOW
    Zhuravlev, A. S.
    Azarov, A. V.
    Semitko, S. P.
    Ioseliani, D. G.
    KARDIOLOGIYA, 2021, 61 (02) : 99 - 105
  • [25] Association of monocyte count on admission with angiographic no-reflow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
    Wang, Zuoyan
    Ren, Lihui
    Liu, Na
    Lei, Licheng
    Ye, Huiming
    Peng, Jianjun
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2016, 74 (10) : 1159 - 1165
  • [26] Prognostic Significance of Presenting Blood Pressure in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Park, Jin Sup
    Cha, Kwang Soo
    Shin, Donghun
    Lee, Dae Sung
    Lee, Hye Won
    Oh, Jun-Hyok
    Choi, Jung Hyun
    Lee, Han Cheol
    Hong, Taek Jong
    Lee, Sang Hyun
    Kim, Jeong Su
    Park, Yong Hyun
    Kim, June Hong
    Chun, Kook-Jin
    Jeong, Myung Ho
    Ahn, Youngkeun
    Chae, Shung Chull
    Kim, Young Jo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2015, 28 (06) : 797 - 805
  • [27] Association of wide pulse pressure with coronary collateral flow in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
    Yilmaz, Cemalettin
    Sengor, Busra Guvendi
    Karaduman, Ahmet
    Tiryaki, Muhammet Mucahit
    Kultursay, Barkin
    Unkun, Tuba
    Zehir, Regayip
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2025, 39 (03) : 210 - 216
  • [28] Increased Platelet-leukocyte Aggregates Are Associated With Myocardial No-reflow in Patients With ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Ren, Faxin
    Mu, Nan
    Zhang, Xia
    Tan, Jinxi
    Li, Liudong
    Zhang, Chuanhuan
    Dong, Mei
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 352 (03) : 261 - 266
  • [29] Development and Validation of a Clinical Risk Score Predicting the No-Reflow Phenomenon in Patients Treated with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
    Wang, Jin-Wen
    Chen, Yun-Dai
    Wang, Chang-Hua
    Yang, Xin-Chun
    Zhu, Xiao-Ling
    Zhou, Zi-Qiang
    CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 124 (03) : 153 - 160
  • [30] The association of acute-to-chronic glycemic ratio with no-reflow in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention
    Simsek, Baris
    Cinar, Tufan
    Tanik, Veysel O.
    Inan, Duygu
    Zeren, Gonul
    Avci, Ilhan I.
    Gungor, Baris
    Yilmaz, Fatih
    Tanboga, Ibrahim H.
    Karabay, Can Y.
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2021, 79 (02) : 170 - 178