Association of Pre-PCI Blood Pressure and No-Reflow in Patients with Acute ST-Elevation Coronary Infarction

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Xiaobo [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Chen [1 ]
Lei, Li [1 ]
Liu, Xuewei [3 ]
Chen, Yejia [1 ]
Wang, Yutian [1 ]
Qiu, Shifeng [1 ]
Xiu, Jiancheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Normal Univ, Xiangdong Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Liling, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Southern Med Univ, Dongguan Peoples Hosp, Affiliated Hosp 10, Dongguan, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
STEMI (ST-elevation acute coronary infarction); no-reflow; SBP(Systolic blood pressure); DBP(Diastolic blood pressure); ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; SEGMENT ELEVATION; CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS; HEART-FAILURE; TASK-FORCE; RISK; FLOW; GUIDELINES; ISCHEMIA; INTERVENTION;
D O I
10.5334/gh.1309
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Previous studies have established blood pressure (BP) as a pivotal factor influencing no-reflow following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-elevation acute coronary infarction (STEMI). However, no relevant study has been conducted to investigate the optimal range of BP associated with the lowest risk of no-reflow among STEMI patients so far. Therefore, our objective was to evaluate the association between pre-PCI BP and the occurrence of no-reflow in patients with STEMI. Method: We included 1025 STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI. The BP pre-PCI was categorized into 20-mmHg increments. Logistic models were employed to assess the association of no-reflow with systolic blood pressure (SBP) or diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Three sensitivity analyses were conducted to further confirm the robustness of the association between blood pressure and no-reflow. Results: SBP or DBP exhibited a U-shaped curve association with no-reflow. No-reflow was higher in patients with lower SBP (<100 mmHg) (adjusted hazard ratio (OR) 3.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.84,7.21; p < 0.001) and lower DBP (<60 mmHg) (OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.63,6.49; p < 0.001) [reference: 120 <= SBP <140; 80 <= DBP <100 mmHg], respectively. Furthermore, no-reflow was higher in patients with higher SBP (>= 160 mmHg) (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.27,3.36; p = 0.003) and DBP (>= 100 mmHg) (OR 3.36, 95% CI 2.07,5.46; p < 0.001), respectively. The results of sensitivity analyses were consistent with the above findings. Conclusion: Maintaining a pre-PCI SBP within the range of 120 to 140 mmHg and a DBP within the range of 80 to 100 mmHg may be confer benefits to patients with STEMI in no-reflow.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Endogenous serum erythropoietin and no-reflow in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction
    Niccoli, Giampaolo
    Andreotti, Felicita
    Marzo, Francesca
    Cecchetti, Silvia
    Santucci, Eleonora
    D'Amario, Domenico
    Pafundi, Teodosio
    Cosentino, Nicola
    Crea, Filippo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2011, 41 (11) : 1210 - 1219
  • [2] A no-reflow prediction model in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction and primary drug-eluting stenting
    Wang, Chang-Hua
    Chen, Yun-Dai
    Yang, Xin-Chun
    Wang, Le-Feng
    Wang, Hong-Shi
    Sun, Zhi-Jun
    Liu, Hong-Bin
    SCANDINAVIAN CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL, 2011, 45 (02) : 98 - 104
  • [3] Association of endothelial dysfunction and no-reflow during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction
    Levi, Yaniv
    Sultan, Ayyaz
    Alemayehu, Mistre
    Wall, Sabrina
    Lavi, Shahar
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2016, 17 (08) : 552 - 555
  • [4] Independent no-reflow predictors in female patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention
    Yundai Chen
    Changhua Wang
    Xinchun Yang
    Lefeng Wang
    Zhijun Sun
    Hongbin Liu
    Lian Chen
    Heart and Vessels, 2012, 27 : 243 - 249
  • [5] The beneficial effects of postconditioning on no-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction
    Dong, Mei
    Mu, Nan
    Guo, Fangming
    Zhang, Chuanhuan
    Ren, Faxin
    Li, Jianping
    Tao, Zhigang
    Yang, Jun
    Li, Guangping
    JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2014, 38 (02) : 208 - 214
  • [6] Independent no-reflow predictors in female patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention
    Chen, Yundai
    Wang, Changhua
    Yang, Xinchun
    Wang, Lefeng
    Sun, Zhijun
    Liu, Hongbin
    Chen, Lian
    HEART AND VESSELS, 2012, 27 (03) : 243 - 249
  • [7] Efficiency and Safety of Intracoronary Epinephrine Administration in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Refractory Coronary No-Reflow
    Ryabov, Vyacheslav
    Dil, Stanislav
    Vyshlov, Evgeny
    Mochula, Olga
    Kercheva, Maria
    Baev, Andrey
    Gergert, Egor
    Maslov, Leonid
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 226 : 118 - 127
  • [8] Administration of intracoronary adenosine before stenting for the prevention of no-reflow in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction
    Sadeghian, Mohammad
    Mousavi, Seyyed Hossein
    Aamaraee, Zahra
    Shafiee, Akbar
    SCANDINAVIAN CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL, 2022, 56 (01) : 23 - 27
  • [9] Predicting coronary no-reflow in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction using Bayesian approaches
    Zhang, Dongfeng
    Song, Xiantao
    Lv, Shuzheng
    Li, Dong
    Yan, Shuai
    Zhang, Min
    CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2014, 25 (07) : 582 - 588
  • [10] Association of autoantibodies targeting endothelin type-A receptors with no-reflow in ST-elevation myocardial infarction
    Tona, Francesco
    Vadori, Marta
    Civieri, Giovanni
    Masiero, Giulia
    Iop, Laura
    Antonelli, Giorgia
    Marra, Martina Perazzolo
    Bianco, Federica
    Cecere, Annagrazia
    Lorenzoni, Giulia
    Naumova, Natalia
    Bernava, Giacomo
    Basso, Daniela
    Plebani, Mario
    Cozzi, Emanuele
    Iliceto, Sabino
    ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2023, 378