METI and Japanese scramble: re-definition of Japan's African policy under the second abe administration and future of African summit diplomacy

被引:0
作者
Hosoi, Tomohiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Inst Social Sci, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Africa; Asia-Africa relations; forum diplomacy; Japan; Shinzo Abe; TICAD;
D O I
10.1080/09512748.2024.2399521
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
During the Second Abe Administration (2012-2020), Japan intensified its efforts to strengthen economic ties with Africa. This paper explores the reasons behind this shift and its implications for Japan's African policy. Challenging the prevailing 'Reactive State' model of Japanese African policy, the study argues that the shift resulted from political and bureaucratic reforms that centralized power in the Prime Minister's office (Kantei) and Abe's favoritism toward the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI). As a result, METI gained greater influence over African policy. Unlike the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, METI views Africa as a promising market with a limited Japanese presence and advocates for a more business-oriented approach. The paper concludes that Japan's new policy provides a convincing reason why Japan must engage with Africa. However, Japanese companies do not always follow as the Government intended. Despite government efforts, the Japanese private sector remains hesitant to expand investment in Africa due to challenging business environments and the absence of legal frameworks between Japan and African countries.
引用
收藏
页码:422 / 442
页数:21
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [1] Aiping Z., 2018, CHINA INT STUDIES, V72, P88
  • [2] Anglo-Japanese Collaboration about Africa in Early 1960s: The Search for 'Complementarity' in the Middle of Decolonisation
    Ampiah, Kweku
    [J]. JOURNAL OF IMPERIAL AND COMMONWEALTH HISTORY, 2011, 39 (02) : 269 - 295
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, White Paper on International Economy and Trade
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2004, Diplomatic bluebook 2004
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2008, White Paper on International Economy and Trade
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2018, Opinion Survey 2018: Regional Overview
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2016, Diplomatic Bluebook
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2020, Diplomatic Bluebook 2020 - Diplomacy and International Situation in 2019
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2014, Diplomatic Bluebook 2014
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2008, Diplomatic Bluebook