Navigating Uncharted Waters: A Mixed Studies Systematic Review of Elective Female Fertility Preservation for Women

被引:0
作者
Cheong, Daphne Yu Bing [1 ]
Pereira, Travis Lanz-Brian [1 ]
Huang, Zhongwei [2 ,3 ]
Shorey, Shefaly [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Alice Lee Ctr Nursing Studies, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Reprod Endocrinol & Infertil, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, NUS Bia Echo Asia Ctr Reprod Longev & Equal ACRLE, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
cryopreservation; fertility preservation; health personnel; reproductive behaviour; AGE-RELATED FERTILITY; HEALTH-CARE; OOCYTE CRYOPRESERVATION; EMPLOYER COVERAGE; MEDICAL-STUDENTS; KNOWLEDGE; ATTITUDES; ACCESS; INTENTIONS; AWARENESS;
D O I
10.1111/jocn.17472
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
AimThis study aimed to review studies exploring the experiences and perceptions of healthcare students and providers regarding their personal choices for elective female fertility preservation and their recommendations of the same to patients.Design/MethodsEmploying Pluye and Hong's convergent qualitative synthesis approach, a mixed-studies review was conducted. The appraisal of studies was performed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and data analysis utilised Thomas and Harden's thematic synthesis approach.Data SourcesSix electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science) were searched from their inception till November 2023.ResultsAbout 24 studies were reviewed, uncovering four major themes: varied personal perspectives, knowledge gaps and role ambiguities, perceived temporal and financial constraints and apprehensions related to fear and stigma.Conclusion/ImplicationThis review underscored the challenges faced by healthcare professionals and students in their personal pursuit of elective fertility preservation. Addressing these challenges demands the implementation of fertility navigators, culturally and religiously sensitive public health campaigns and staff training. Moreover, standardised guidelines, transparent cost and process reporting, evidence-based education, counselling on risks and success rates and governmental support in the form of subsidies can mitigate barriers, enhance cost-effectiveness and promote equitable access to care. Collaboration among stakeholders is imperative to ensure equitable access and maintain quality care in elective female fertility preservation.Reporting MethodThis mixed studies review followed the reporting guidelines in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.Patient or Public ContributionNo Patient or Public Contribution. Trial Registration: This review has been registered on the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (CRD42023395406)Patient or Public ContributionNo Patient or Public Contribution. Trial Registration: This review has been registered on the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (CRD42023395406)
引用
收藏
页码:4568 / 4584
页数:17
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Persevering in Fertility Treatments Despite Failures: Unrealistic Optimism and the Reality of a Pronatalist Culture [J].
Abramov, Maayan ;
Shalom-Paz, Einat ;
Benyamini, Yael .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2022, 29 (02) :209-219
[2]   Attitudes and Behavior towards Interprofessional Collaboration among Healthcare Professionals in a Large Academic Medical Center [J].
Ansa, Benjamin E. ;
Zechariah, Sunitha ;
Gates, Amy M. ;
Johnson, Stephanie W. ;
Heboyan, Vahe ;
De Leo, Gianluca .
HEALTHCARE, 2020, 8 (03)
[3]   What do female medical students know about planned oocyte cryopreservation and what are their personal attitudes? [J].
Armstrong, Austin G. ;
Woods, Maggie ;
Keomany, Jennifer ;
Grainger, David ;
Shah, Shriya ;
Pavone, MaryEllen .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2023, 40 (6) :1305-1311
[4]   Childbearing, Infertility, and Career Trajectories Among Women in Medicine [J].
Bakkensen, Jennifer B. ;
Smith, Kathryn S. ;
Cheung, Elaine O. ;
Moreno, Patricia I. ;
Goldman, Kara N. ;
Lawson, Angela K. ;
Feinberg, Eve C. .
JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (07)
[5]   Respecting autonomy-a call for truth in commercial advertising for planned oocyte cryopreservation [J].
Bayefsky, Michelle J. ;
DeCherney, Alan H. ;
King, Louise P. .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2020, 113 (04) :743-744
[6]   The dilemma of social oocyte freezing: usage rate is too low to make it cost-effective [J].
Ben-Rafael, Zion .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2018, 37 (04) :443-448
[7]   Discordant Views of Experts and Laypersons on the Adoption of New Fertility Technology [J].
Brezis, Mayer ;
Malkiel, Avishay ;
Chinitz, David ;
Lehmann, Lisa Soleymani .
MEDICAL CARE, 2011, 49 (04) :420-423
[8]   Employee benefit or occupational hazard? How employer coverage of egg freezing impacts reproductive decisions of graduate students [J].
Cardozo, Eden R. ;
Turocy, Jenna M. ;
James, Kaitlyn E. ;
Freeman, Marlene P. ;
Toth, Thomas L. .
F&S REPORTS, 2020, 1 (03) :186-192
[9]   Elective oocyte cryopreservation for age-related fertility decline [J].
Chronopoulou, E. ;
Raperport, C. ;
Sfakianakis, A. ;
Srivastava, G. ;
Homburg, R. .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2021, 38 (05) :1177-1186
[10]   Fertility preservation practices for female oncofertility differ significantly across the USA: results of a survey of SREI members [J].
Cooper, Leah J. ;
Emery, Benjamin R. ;
Aston, Kenneth ;
Fair, Douglas ;
Rosen, Mitchell P. ;
Johnstone, Erica ;
Letourneau, Joseph M. .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2022, 39 (08) :1749-1757