The Efficacy of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Developing Science Education Preservice Teachers' Writing Skills: An Experimental Approach

被引:2
作者
Li, Zanpeng [1 ]
Ironsi, Chinaza Solomon [2 ]
机构
[1] Hainan Normal Univ, Dept Humanities & Social Sci, Haikou, Hainan, Peoples R China
[2] Akdeniz Karpaz Univ, Foreign Languages & English Preparatory Sch, North Cyprus, Turkiye
关键词
Generative AI; ChatGPT; Techno-determinism; Preservice teachers; Writing skills; Science education; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1007/s10956-024-10148-2
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Given the continued debates sparked by recent technology innovation around generative artificial intelligence and the varied findings on its use for productive learning, this paper addresses the efficacy of ChatGPT from a preservice teachers' perspective and science education viewpoint. This study adopted a mixed-method research design with an experimental approach for methodology. For data collection, post-tests and interviews were used to elicit information from the participants on the efficacy of ChatGPT in improving their writing skills and their opinions on its efficacy for learning. The paper revealed that ChatGPT might not significantly improve preservice teachers' writing skills. While this may be contextual, our findings provide valuable insights into pedagogical strategies for resisting techno-deterministic framings of present-day learning. This study contributes to the corpus of studies in the scientific literature on the efficacy of ChatGPT in improving student achievement. Besides, it unpacks pedagogical strategies that may be applied to improving students' writing skills.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT [J].
Adiguzel, Tufan ;
Kaya, Mehmet Haldun ;
Cansu, Fatih Kursat .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 15 (03)
[2]  
Ahmed A., 2022, Exploring silences in the field of computer assisted language learning, P19, DOI [10.1007/978-3-031-06501-92, DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-06501-92]
[3]  
Aoun JE, 2017, ROBOT-PROOF: HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, P1
[4]   The No-Go Zone of Journalism Studies-Revisiting the Concept of Technological Determinism [J].
Appelgren, Ester .
DIGITAL JOURNALISM, 2023, 11 (04) :672-690
[5]   Preservice ICT teachers' technology metaphors in the margin of technological determinism [J].
Bardakci, Salih ;
Unver, Tugba Kocadag .
EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 25 (02) :905-925
[6]   Fostering Students' Workplace Communicative Competence and Collaborative Mindset through an Inquiry-Based Learning Design [J].
Chen, Rosa Huiju .
EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2021, 11 (01) :1-13
[7]   Technological determinism or strategic advantage? Comparing the two Karabakh Wars between Armenia and Azerbaijan [J].
Cheterian, Vicken .
JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC STUDIES, 2024, 47 (02) :214-237
[8]   Thematic analysis [J].
Clarke, Victoria ;
Braun, Virginia .
JOURNAL OF POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 12 (03) :297-298
[9]   Examining Science Education in ChatGPT: An Exploratory Study of Generative Artificial Intelligence [J].
Cooper, Grant .
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 32 (03) :444-452
[10]   Leadership is needed for ethical ChatGPT: Character, assessment, and learning using artifiicial intelligence (AI) [J].
Crawford, Joseph ;
Cowling, Michael ;
Allen, Kelly -Ann .
JOURNAL OF UNIVERSITY TEACHING AND LEARNING PRACTICE, 2023, 20 (03)