What is the structure of a Challenge Based Learning project? A shortitudinal trajectory analysis of student process behaviours in an interdisciplinary engineering course

被引:1
作者
Martin, Diana Adela [1 ,2 ]
Bombaerts, Gunter [2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Ctr Engn Educ, London, England
[2] Technol Univ Eindhoven, Dept Ind Engn & Innovat Sci, Philosophy & Eth, Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
Challenge Based Learning; interdisciplinarity; sociotechnical engineering education; shortitudinal study; thematic trajectory analysis; group projects; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1080/03043797.2024.2376222
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Challenge Based Learning (CBL) is an educational approach that has gained popularity in response to the need for authentic learning environments. While the CBL literature is predominantly focused on cases of pedagogical implementations, the actual processes by which students develop CBL projects remain under-investigated. This shortitudinal study seeks to examine the phases of CBL project development and associated process behaviours at group level, as they unfold. The participants are 6 interdisciplinary student groups totalling 22 students enrolled in a first-year course on ethics and data analytics. Data was collected weekly throughout 10 weeks via reflective diaries (n = 15 students) and observation of course sessions (n = 22) and is complemented by interviews after course completion (n = 15). The data was subject to a thematic trajectory analysis. The study identifies 7 distinct phases in the temporal structure of a CBL project: gaining client know-how, articulating a problem, mapping the problem context, setting the aim, proposing an action path, testing and evaluating it, and implementing the solution. The article concludes with recommendations for further research into CBL project development processes, which may support the growing adoption of real-life interdisciplinary projects in engineering education.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 81
页数:31
相关论文
共 82 条
  • [1] Adams W. C., 2015, Handbook of practical program evaluation, P492, DOI [DOI 10.1002/9781119171386.CH19, 10.1002/9781119171386.CH19]
  • [2] Ambrose S. A., 2010, How learning works: seven research-based principles for smart teaching
  • [3] Ambrosi G., 2023, IMPLEMENTING CBL U T
  • [4] Ash S.L., 2004, INNOVATIVE HIGHER LE, V29, P137, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IHIE.0000048795.84634.4a, DOI 10.1023/B:IHIE.0000048795.84634.4A]
  • [5] Engineering Student's Ethical Awareness and Behavior: A New Motivational Model
    Bairaktarova, Diana
    Woodcock, Anna
    [J]. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2017, 23 (04) : 1129 - 1157
  • [6] Berland L. K., 2013, J-PEER, V3, P5, DOI DOI 10.18260/1-2--21948
  • [7] Reflection to support ethics learning in an interdisciplinary challenge-based learning course
    Bombaerts, Gunter
    Martin, Diana
    Watkins, Adam
    Doulougeri, Karolina
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 IEEE GLOBAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION CONFERENCE (EDUCON 2022), 2022, : 1393 - 1400
  • [8] Engineering Students as Co-creators in an Ethics of Technology Course
    Bombaerts, Gunter
    Doulougeri, Karolina
    Tsui, Shelly
    Laes, Erik
    Spahn, Andreas
    Martin, Diana Adela
    [J]. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS, 2021, 27 (04)
  • [9] Advancing Engineering Education in P-12 Classrooms
    Brophy, Sean
    Klein, Stacy
    Portsmore, Merredith
    Rogers, Chris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2008, 97 (03) : 369 - 387
  • [10] Educational Innovation: Focusing on enhancing the skills of Generation Z workforce in STEM
    Caratozzolo, Patricia
    Bravo, Eugenio
    Garay-Rondero, Claudia
    Membrillo-Hernandez, Jorge
    [J]. 2021 WORLD ENGINEERING EDUCATION FORUM/GLOBAL ENGINEERING DEANS COUNCIL (WEEF/GEDC), 2021, : 488 - 495