Research on evolutionary game and stability of port cooperation

被引:0
作者
Yuan, Kebiao [1 ]
Wang, Xuefeng [2 ]
机构
[1] Ningbo Univ Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Ningbo 315211, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Maritime Univ, Coll Transport & Commun, Shanghai 201306, Peoples R China
关键词
Port cooperation; Cooperation mechanism; Evolution path; Stability; Evolutionary game theory; PANEL EVIDENCE; COMPETITION; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; INTEGRATION; INVESTMENT; IMPACT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Faced with the pressure brought by major changes in the shipping industry such as liner alliances and larger ships, more and more ports are inclined to choose cooperation. This paper first explains the reasons for the lack of spontaneous cooperation motives between ports through game theory and then points out that in order to achieve stable cooperation between ports, it may be necessary to use external forces to establish a cooperation mechanism that enables both parties to achieve a win-win situation. Further, the article explores the evolution path of port cooperation and the stability of cooperation through evolutionary game theory and finds that the incremental benefits of port cooperation, the cost of cooperation, the additional revenue of free-riding, the compensation for unilateral cooperation, and the distribution coefficient of incremental benefits are the key factors affecting the stability of port cooperation. Then, with the help of numerical simulation experiments, the influencing factors affecting the evolution path and stability of port cooperation are discussed. Finally, in order to promote port cooperation and improve the stability of cooperation, this paper puts forward corresponding policy implications and management insights for policymakers based on relevant influencing factors.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 109
页数:13
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [41] Difference in port cooperation between motivations: Cooperation for regional welfare and for competition
    Tagawa, Hoshi
    Kawasaki, Tomoya
    Hanaoka, Shinya
    [J]. MARITIME TRANSPORT RESEARCH, 2022, 3
  • [42] Efficient inter-port cooperation considering port congestion and port charge
    Takebayashi, Mikio
    Hanaoka, Shinya
    [J]. MARITIME TRANSPORT RESEARCH, 2021, 2
  • [43] Will Port Integration Help Reduce Carbon Emissions and Improve Social Welfare?
    Teng, Zhuoqi
    Li, Xiaoli
    Fang, Yuantao
    Fu, Hailing
    [J]. DISCRETE DYNAMICS IN NATURE AND SOCIETY, 2021, 2021
  • [44] The impact of port service quality on customer satisfaction: The case of Singapore
    Thai, Vinh V.
    [J]. MARITIME ECONOMICS & LOGISTICS, 2016, 18 (04) : 458 - 475
  • [45] Competition vs. cooperation between neighbouring ports: A case study in Chile
    Trujillo, Lourdes
    Campos, Javier
    Perez, Ivone
    [J]. RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 26 : 100 - 108
  • [46] Urban road congestion, capacity expansion and port competition: empirical analysis of US container ports
    Wan, Yulai
    Zhang, Anming
    Yuen, Andrew C. L.
    [J]. MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT, 2013, 40 (05) : 417 - 438
  • [47] Port integration in China: Temporal pathways, spatial patterns and dynamics
    Wang Chengjin
    Ducruet, Cesar
    Wang Wei
    [J]. CHINESE GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 25 (05) : 612 - 628
  • [48] The relative efficiency and financial risk assessment of shipping companies
    Wang, Grace W. Y.
    Woo, Su-Han
    Mileski, Joan
    [J]. MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT, 2014, 41 (07) : 651 - 666
  • [49] Cooperation or competition? Factors and conditions affecting regional port governance in South China
    Wang, Kun
    Ng, Adolf K. Y.
    Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee
    Fu, Xiaowen
    [J]. MARITIME ECONOMICS & LOGISTICS, 2012, 14 (03) : 386 - 408
  • [50] Societal costs and benefits of cooperation between port authorities
    Wortelboer-Van Donselaar, Pauline
    Kolkman, Joost
    [J]. MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT, 2010, 37 (03) : 271 - 284