Research on evolutionary game and stability of port cooperation

被引:0
作者
Yuan, Kebiao [1 ]
Wang, Xuefeng [2 ]
机构
[1] Ningbo Univ Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Ningbo 315211, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Maritime Univ, Coll Transport & Commun, Shanghai 201306, Peoples R China
关键词
Port cooperation; Cooperation mechanism; Evolution path; Stability; Evolutionary game theory; PANEL EVIDENCE; COMPETITION; GOVERNANCE; MANAGEMENT; INTEGRATION; INVESTMENT; IMPACT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Faced with the pressure brought by major changes in the shipping industry such as liner alliances and larger ships, more and more ports are inclined to choose cooperation. This paper first explains the reasons for the lack of spontaneous cooperation motives between ports through game theory and then points out that in order to achieve stable cooperation between ports, it may be necessary to use external forces to establish a cooperation mechanism that enables both parties to achieve a win-win situation. Further, the article explores the evolution path of port cooperation and the stability of cooperation through evolutionary game theory and finds that the incremental benefits of port cooperation, the cost of cooperation, the additional revenue of free-riding, the compensation for unilateral cooperation, and the distribution coefficient of incremental benefits are the key factors affecting the stability of port cooperation. Then, with the help of numerical simulation experiments, the influencing factors affecting the evolution path and stability of port cooperation are discussed. Finally, in order to promote port cooperation and improve the stability of cooperation, this paper puts forward corresponding policy implications and management insights for policymakers based on relevant influencing factors.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 109
页数:13
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] Are the innovation processes in seaport terminal operations successful?
    Acciaro, Michele
    Ferrari, Claudio
    Lam, Jasmine S. L.
    Macario, Rosario
    Roumboutsos, Athena
    Sys, Christa
    Tei, Alessio
    Vanelslander, Thierry
    [J]. MARITIME POLICY & MANAGEMENT, 2018, 45 (06) : 787 - 802
  • [2] Biform games
    Brandenburger, Adam
    Stuart, Harborne
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 53 (04) : 537 - 549
  • [3] Brooks, 2009, CANADIAN J TRANSPORT, V4, P29
  • [4] Castelein R B., 2019, Journal of Shipping and Trade, V4
  • [5] Analysis on stability of strategic alliance: A game theory perspective
    Chen F.-Q.
    Fan L.-C.
    [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 2006, 7 (12): : 1995 - 2001
  • [6] The role of ports in the economic development of port cities: Panel evidence from China
    Cong, Long-ze
    Zhang, Dong
    Wang, Ming-li
    Xu, Hong-feng
    Li, Li
    [J]. TRANSPORT POLICY, 2020, 90 : 13 - 21
  • [7] Modelling emission control taxes in port areas and port privatization levels in port competition and co-operation sub-games
    Cui, Han
    Notteboom, Theo
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 56 : 110 - 128
  • [8] Measurement and spatial spillover effects of port comprehensive strength: Empirical evidence from China
    Deng Zhao
    Li Zhen-fu
    Zhou Yu-tao
    Chen Xiao
    Liang Shan-shan
    [J]. TRANSPORT POLICY, 2020, 99 : 288 - 298
  • [9] Dong G., 2011, 2011 INT C E BUS E G, P1
  • [10] Tacit Collusion of Pricing Strategy Game between Regional Ports: The Case of Yangtze River Economic Belt
    Dong, Gang
    Zhong, Dandan
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (02)