EFFECT OF REALISTIC MODELING OF DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION ON THE PREDICTION OF VOLUME OF ACTIVATED TISSUE

被引:18
作者
Golestanirad, L. [1 ]
Izquierdo, A. P. [2 ]
Graham, S. J. [1 ]
Mosig, J. R. [2 ]
Pollo, C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Med Biophys, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Ecole Polytech Fed Lausanne, Lab Electromagnet & Acoust, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
[3] CHU Vaudois, Dept Neurosurg, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
PARKINSONS-DISEASE; NEUROMAGNETIC FIELDS;
D O I
10.2528/PIER12013108
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established treatment for Parkinson's disease, essential tremor and dystonia. It has also been successfully applied to treat various other neurological and psychiatric conditions including depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Numerous computational models, mostly based on the Finite Element Method (FEM) approach have been suggested to investigate the biophysical mechanisms of electromagnetic wave-tissue interaction during DBS. These models, although emphasizing the importance of various electrical and geometrical parameters, mostly have used simplified geometries over a tightly restricted tissue volume in the case of monopolar stimulation. In the present work we show that topological arrangements and geometrical properties of the model have a significant effect on the distribution of voltages in the concerned tissues. The results support reconsidering the current approach for modeling monopolar DBS which uses a restricted cubic area extended a few centimeters around the active electrode to predict the volume of activated tissue. We propose a new technique called multi-resolution FEM modeling, which may improve the accuracy of the prediction of volume of activated tissue and yet be computationally tractable on personal computers.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 16
页数:16
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
ANSYS Inc., MAXW 3D
[2]   Sources and effects of electrode impedance during deep brain stimulation [J].
Butson, CR ;
Maks, CB ;
McIntyre, CC .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 117 (02) :447-454
[3]   Tissue and electrode capacitance reduce neural activation volumes during deep brain stimulation [J].
Butson, CR ;
McIntyre, CC .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 116 (10) :2490-2500
[4]  
EPFL Computer Science Departement, VIS HUM PROJ
[5]   Deep brain stimulation for treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder:: psychopathological and neuropsychological outcome in three cases [J].
Gabriëls, L ;
Cosyns, P ;
Nuttin, B ;
Demeulemeester, H ;
Gybels, J .
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 107 (04) :275-282
[6]   Effect of Model Accuracy on the Result of Computed Current Densities in the Simulation of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation [J].
Golestanirad, Laleh ;
Mattes, Michael ;
Mosig, Juan R. ;
Pollo, Claudio .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2010, 46 (12) :4046-4051
[7]   Influence of tissue resistivities on neuromagnetic fields and electric potentials studied with a finite element model of the head [J].
Haueisen, J ;
Ramon, C ;
Eiselt, M ;
Brauer, H ;
Nowak, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1997, 44 (08) :727-735
[8]   NEURON: A tool for neuroscientists [J].
Hines, ML ;
Carnevale, NT .
NEUROSCIENTIST, 2001, 7 (02) :123-135
[9]   How does deep brain stimulation work? Present understanding and future questions [J].
McIntyre, CC ;
Savasta, M ;
Walter, BL ;
Vitek, JL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 21 (01) :40-50
[10]   Uncovering the mechanism(s) of action of deep brain stimulation: activation, inhibition, or both [J].
McIntyre, CC ;
Savasta, M ;
Kerkerian-Le Goff, L ;
Vitek, JL .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 115 (06) :1239-1248