Non-irradiated area of intraoperative radiotherapy with electron technique: outcomes and pattern of failure in early-stage breast cancer from a single-center, registry study

IntroductionIntraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) with electrons has revealed to have higher rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) than external beam radiotherapy in updated large-scale, randomized controlled trials in 2021. This study details the oncological outcomes of IORT with electron beams using our strict IORT policies. We have found new and important observations regarding the location of recurrence.Methods and materialsThis is a single institution registry of early-stage breast cancer patients who underwent lumpectomy and electron beam IORT with appropriate cone size. All patients met our pre-excision requirements. The primary endpoint was 5-year IBTR rate, with secondary endpoints being 5-year locoregional failure rate, 5-year distant metastasis rate, 5-year overall survival and, importantly, the failure patterns.ResultsBetween January 2011 and December 2022, 124 patients were recruited. The median follow-up was 6.7 years. The 5-year IBTR rate was 1.87% (95% CI 0.47-7.29%), which is much lower than the ELIOT trial and comparable with other accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) techniques. The 5-year locoregional failure rate was 3.68% (95% CI 1.40-9.52%), and the 5-year distant metastasis rate was 0.88% (95% CI 0.13-6.12%), while the 5-year overall survival rate was 97.52% (95% CI 92.44-99.19%). Six patients experienced IBTR. All recurrences were in surgical area, occurring superficial to the tumor bed and within 1 cm of the skin dermis. This failure pattern is very unique and might be explained by our hypothesis of the non-irradiated area beneath the skin.ConclusionsIORT with electron beams with strict patient selection criteria and strict large cone size is still an acceptable treatment for select patients with early-stage breast cancer. However, our new findings support extreme caution in the non-irradiated area beneath the skin around the tumor cavity. Given the constraints of our sample size, these findings should be interpreted cautiously and warrant further investigation in larger, more comprehensive studies.