Behavioral brittleness: the case for strategic behavioral public policy

被引:17
|
作者
Schmidt, Ruth [1 ]
Stenger, Katelyn [2 ]
机构
[1] IIT, Inst Design, 3137 S Fed St, Chicago, IL 60616 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Convergent Behav Sci Initiat, Olsson Hall 111B, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA
关键词
behavioral design; public policy; strategy; complex systems; adaptation; PARTICIPATORY DESIGN; SYSTEMS THINKING; MAKING PROCESSES; HEALTH-POLICY; ECONOMICS; LESSONS; DISTRUST; SOCIETY; TRIALS; MODELS;
D O I
10.1017/bpp.2021.16
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Despite widespread recognition that behavioral public policy (BPP) needs to move beyond nudging if the field is to achieve more significant impact, problem-solving approaches remain optimized to achieve tactical success and are evaluated by short-term metrics with the assumption of stable systems. As a result, current methodologies may contribute to the development of solutions that appear well formed but become 'brittle' in the face of more complex contexts if they fail to consider important contextual cues, broader system forces, and emergent conditions, which can take three distinct forms: contextual, systemic, and anticipatory brittleness. The Covid-19 pandemic and vaccination rollout present an opportunity to identify and correct interventional brittleness with a new methodological approach - strategic BPP (SBPP) - that can inform the creation of more resilient solutions by embracing more diverse forms of evidence and applied foresight, designing interventions within ecosystems, and iteratively developing solutions. To advance the case for adopting a SBPP and 'roughly right' modes of inquiry, we use the Covid-19 vaccination rollout to define a new methodological roadmap, while also acknowledging that taking a more strategic approach may challenge current BPP norms.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 237
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Impact of Behavioral Science Experiments on Energy Policy
    Hahn, Robert
    Metcalfe, Robert
    ECONOMICS OF ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2016, 5 (02) : 27 - 44
  • [32] Toward a “constitution” for behavioral policy-making
    Fabbri M.
    Faure M.
    International Review of Economics, 2018, 65 (3) : 241 - 270
  • [33] Single-case experimental designs for behavioral neuroscience
    Soto, Paul L.
    JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 2020, 114 (03) : 447 - 467
  • [34] Applying Behavioral Insights in Policy Analysis: Recent Trends in the United States
    Gopalan, Maithreyi
    Pirog, Maureen A.
    POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 2017, 45 : S82 - S114
  • [35] Behavioral Food Public Policies: The Relevance of Identity
    Gallois, Florence
    Hedoin, Cyril
    OECONOMIA-HISTORY METHODOLOGY PHILOSOPHY, 2023, 13 (04): : 1055 - 1078
  • [36] Public Policy and a Strategic Digital City Project: A Case Study of the Brazilian Municipality of Vinhedo
    Rezende, Denis Alcides
    Procopiuck, Mario
    Figueiredo, Frederico de Carvalho
    JOURNAL OF URBAN TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 22 (02) : 63 - 83
  • [37] Nudge and Other Policy Tools in the Behavioral Policy Cube: Concepts and Cases
    Ozdemiray, Sema Muge
    Karamanoglu, Hande
    AMME IDARESI DERGISI, 2024, 57 (01): : 87 - 108
  • [38] BEHAVIORAL ASPECTS OF THE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF GLOBAL PUBLIC GOODS AND COMMON POOL RESOURCES
    van Aaken, Anne
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2018, 112 (01) : 67 - 79
  • [39] Applying Insights from Behavioral Economics to Policy Design
    Madrian, Brigitte C.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS, VOL 6, 2014, 6 : 663 - 688
  • [40] Public policy innovations: the case of undeclared work
    Williams, Colin C.
    Windebank, Jan
    Baric, Marijana
    Nadin, Sara
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2013, 51 (06) : 1161 - 1175