Behavioral brittleness: the case for strategic behavioral public policy

被引:17
|
作者
Schmidt, Ruth [1 ]
Stenger, Katelyn [2 ]
机构
[1] IIT, Inst Design, 3137 S Fed St, Chicago, IL 60616 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Convergent Behav Sci Initiat, Olsson Hall 111B, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA
关键词
behavioral design; public policy; strategy; complex systems; adaptation; PARTICIPATORY DESIGN; SYSTEMS THINKING; MAKING PROCESSES; HEALTH-POLICY; ECONOMICS; LESSONS; DISTRUST; SOCIETY; TRIALS; MODELS;
D O I
10.1017/bpp.2021.16
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Despite widespread recognition that behavioral public policy (BPP) needs to move beyond nudging if the field is to achieve more significant impact, problem-solving approaches remain optimized to achieve tactical success and are evaluated by short-term metrics with the assumption of stable systems. As a result, current methodologies may contribute to the development of solutions that appear well formed but become 'brittle' in the face of more complex contexts if they fail to consider important contextual cues, broader system forces, and emergent conditions, which can take three distinct forms: contextual, systemic, and anticipatory brittleness. The Covid-19 pandemic and vaccination rollout present an opportunity to identify and correct interventional brittleness with a new methodological approach - strategic BPP (SBPP) - that can inform the creation of more resilient solutions by embracing more diverse forms of evidence and applied foresight, designing interventions within ecosystems, and iteratively developing solutions. To advance the case for adopting a SBPP and 'roughly right' modes of inquiry, we use the Covid-19 vaccination rollout to define a new methodological roadmap, while also acknowledging that taking a more strategic approach may challenge current BPP norms.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 237
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Behavioral criminology and public policy
    Loughran, Thomas A.
    CRIMINOLOGY & PUBLIC POLICY, 2019, 18 (04) : 737 - 758
  • [2] Psychology, Behavioral Economics, and Public Policy
    On Amir
    Dan Ariely
    Alan Cooke
    David Dunning
    Nicholas Epley
    Uri Gneezy
    Botond Koszegi
    Donald Lichtenstein
    Nina Mazar
    Sendhil Mullainathan
    Drazen Prelec
    Eldar Shafir
    Jose Silva
    Marketing Letters, 2005, 16 : 443 - 454
  • [3] BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS AND EMPIRICAL PUBLIC POLICY
    Hursh, Steven R.
    Roma, Peter G.
    JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 2013, 99 (01) : 98 - 124
  • [4] Behavioral Insights as a Public Policy Tool
    Ozdemir, Sebnem
    TURKIYE ILETISIM ARASTIRMALARI DERGISI-TURKISH REVIEW OF COMMUNICATION STUDIES, 2019, (34): : 247 - 274
  • [5] Psychology, behavioral economics, and public policy
    Amir, O
    Ariely, D
    Cooke, A
    Dunning, D
    Epley, N
    Gneezy, U
    Koszegi, B
    Lichtenstein, D
    Mazar, N
    Mullainathan, S
    Prelec, D
    Shafir, E
    Silva, J
    MARKETING LETTERS, 2005, 16 (3-4) : 443 - 454
  • [6] An s-frame agenda for behavioral public policy research
    Connolly, Daniel J.
    Loewenstein, George
    Chater, Nick
    BEHAVIOURAL PUBLIC POLICY, 2024,
  • [7] Behavioral responsive regulation: Bringing together responsive regulation and behavioral public policy
    Barak-Corren, Netta
    Kariv-Teitelbaum, Yael
    REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 2021, 15 : S163 - S182
  • [8] Experimental Public Policy, Discovery, and Behavioral Taxation
    Thomas, Michael D.
    Miller, Nathan A.
    JOURNAL OF PRIVATE ENTERPRISE, 2021, 36 (04): : 1 - 20
  • [9] Behavioral rationality as a foundation for public policy studies
    Jones, Bryan D.
    COGNITIVE SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2017, 43 : 63 - 75
  • [10] Self-control and behavioral public policy
    Hofmann, Wilhelm
    Grelle, Sonja
    Nielsen, Kristian Steensen
    Kukowski, Charlotte Anna
    CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 59