Linking organizational safety support and construction workers' safety behavior: the roles of safety motivation, emotional exhaustion and psychosocial safety climate

被引:1
作者
Liu, Wenyao [1 ]
Meng, Qingfeng [1 ]
Li, Zhen [1 ]
Chong, Heap-Yih [2 ,3 ]
Li, Keyao [4 ,5 ]
Tang, Hui [6 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Management, Zhenjiang, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Audit Univ, Sch Engn Audit, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Curtin Univ, Sch Design & Built Environm, Perth, Australia
[4] Curtin Univ, Future Work Inst, Perth, Australia
[5] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Business & Law, Perth, Australia
[6] Jiangsu Univ, Sch Environm & Safety Engn, Zhenjiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Organizational safety support; Safety behavior; Safety motivation; Emotional exhaustion; Psychosocial safety climate; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; PERCEIVED COWORKER SUPPORT; JOB DEMANDS; EMPLOYEE SAFETY; UNOBSERVABLE VARIABLES; CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIORS; SOCIAL-EXCHANGE; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT; RESOURCES;
D O I
10.1108/ECAM-02-2024-0182
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
PurposeConstruction workers' safety behavior has been proven to be crucial in preventing occupational injuries and improving workplace safety, and organizational safety support provides essential resources to promote such behavior. However, the specific mechanisms of how organizational safety support affects safety behavior have not been thoroughly explored. Therefore, this study explored the relationship between workers' perceived organizational safety support (perceived supervisor/coworker safety support) and safety behavior (safety task/contextual behavior), while considering the mediating effects of safety motivation, emotional exhaustion, and the moderating effect of psychosocial safety climate.Design/methodology/approachBased on the quantitative research method, the hypothesis was tested. The data were collected from 500 construction workers using a structured questionnaire. Observed variables were tested using confirmatory factor analysis, and the path coefficient of fitted model was then analyzed including the associated mediating and moderating effects.FindingsThe study found that (1) safety support from both supervisors and coworkers directly forecasted both types of safety behavior, (2) safety motivation was primarily predicted by perceived supervisor safety support, and perceived coworker safety support better predicted emotional exhaustion. Safety motivation mediated the relationship between perceived supervisor safety support and safety contextual behavior, and emotional exhaustion mediated the relationship between both types of safety support and both types of safety behavior, (3) psychosocial safety climate moderated the pathway relationships mediated by safety motivation and emotional exhaustion, respectively.Research limitations/implicationsThe samples of this study were mostly immersed in eastern culture and the construction industry, and the cultural and industry diversity of the samples deserves further consideration to enhance the universality of the results. The cross-sectional approach may have some impact on the accuracy of the results. In addition, other potential mediating variables deserve to be explored in future studies.Originality/valueThis study provides a new basis for extending current theoretical frameworks of organizational safety support and safety behavior by using a moderated mediation model. Some practical insights on construction safety management have also been proposed based on the research findings. It is recommended that practitioners should further raise awareness of the critical role of supervisor-worker and worker-coworker relationships, as high levels of safety support from the supervisor/worker respectively effectively encourage safety motivation, alleviate emotional exhaustion, and thus improve workers' safety performance. Meanwhile, the psychosocial health conditions of workers should also receive further attention.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 88 条
[11]   Employee perspectives on safety citizenship behaviors and safety violations [J].
Chmiel, Nik ;
Laurent, Julie ;
Hansez, Isabelle .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2017, 93 :96-107
[12]   Workplace Safety: A Meta-Analysis of the Roles of Person and Situation Factors [J].
Christian, Michael S. ;
Bradley, Jill C. ;
Wallace, J. Craig ;
Burke, Michael J. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 94 (05) :1103-1127
[13]   The Relationship between Workplace Ostracism, TMX, Task Interdependence, and Task Performance: A Moderated Mediation Model [J].
Chung, Yang Woon .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (12) :1-11
[14]   The role of leader influence tactics and safety climate in engaging employees' safety participation [J].
Clarke, Sharon ;
Ward, Katie .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2006, 26 (05) :1175-1185
[15]   Making work safer: Testing a model of social exchange and safety management [J].
DeJoy, David M. ;
Della, Lindsay J. ;
Vandenberg, Robert J. ;
Wilson, Mark G. .
JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2010, 41 (02) :163-171
[16]   The job demands-resources model of burnout [J].
Demerouti, E ;
Bakker, AB ;
Nachreiner, F ;
Schaufeli, WB .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 86 (03) :499-512
[17]   Job crafting and extra-role behavior: The role of work engagement and flourishing [J].
Demerouti, Evangelia ;
Bakker, Arnold B. ;
Gevers, Josette M. P. .
JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2015, 91 :87-96
[18]   Qualitative job insecurity, emotional exhaustion and their effects on hotel employees' job embeddedness: The moderating role of perceived organizational support [J].
Dogantekin, Ali ;
Secilmis, Cihan ;
Karatepe, Osman M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2022, 105
[19]   Psychosocial safety climate moderates the job demand-resource interaction in predicting workgroup distress [J].
Dollard, Maureen F. ;
Tuckey, Michelle R. ;
Dormann, Christian .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2012, 45 :694-704
[20]   Psychosocial safety climate as a precursor to conducive work environments, psychological health problems, and employee engagement [J].
Dollard, Maureen F. ;
Bakker, Arnold B. .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 83 (03) :579-599