Enhancing the streamflow simulation of a process-based hydrological model using machine learning and multi-source data

被引:3
作者
Lei, Huajin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Hongyi [4 ]
Hu, Wanpin [5 ]
机构
[1] Xihua Univ, Sch Energy & Power Engn, Chengdu 610039, Peoples R China
[2] Xihua Univ, Key Lab Fluid Machinery & Engn, Chengdu 610039, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, Coll Water Resource & Hydropower, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Northwest Inst Ecoenvironm & Resources, Lanzhou 730070, Peoples R China
[5] Sichuan Inst Land Sci & Technol, Dept Nat Resources Sichuan Prov, Chengdu 610065, Peoples R China
关键词
Streamflow simulation; Process-based hydrological model; Machine learning; Hybrid modelling; Jialing River basin; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; VARIABLE SELECTION; BTOP MODEL; REGRESSION; UNCERTAINTY; EVAPORATION; PREDICTION; TOPMODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102755
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Streamflow simulation is crucial for flood mitigation, ecological protection, and water resource planning. Process-based hydrological models and machine learning algorithms are the mainstream tools for streamflow simulation. However, their inherent limitations, such as time-consuming and large data requirements, make achieving high-precision simulations challenging. This study developed a hybrid approach to simultaneously improve the accuracy and computational efficiency of streamflow simulation, which integrates Block-wise use of the TOPMODEL (BTOP) model into the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), i.e., BTOP_XGB. In this approach, BTOP generates simulated streamflow using the Latin hypercube sampling algorithm instead of the time-consuming calibration algorithms to reduce computational costs. Then, XGBoost combines BTOP simulated streamflow with multi-source data to reduce simulation errors. In which, serval input variable selection algorithms are employed to choose relevant inputs and remove redundant information for model. The hybrid approach is validated and compared with a standalone model at three hydrological stations in the Jialing River basin, China. The results show that the performance of BTOP_XGB is significantly better than the BTOP and XGBoost models. The NSE of BTOP_XGB at Beibei, Xiaoheba, and Luoduxi stations increases by 54%, 21%, and 83%, respectively. Meanwhile, the computational time of BTOP_XGB is saved by >90% compared to the original calibrated BTOP. BTOP_XGB is less affected by parameter sample sizes and data amounts, demonstrating the robustness of the hybrid model. This study simplifies the complexity of the hydrological model and enhances the stability of machine learning, jointly improving the reliability of streamflow simulation. The hybrid approach provides a potential shortcut for streamflow simulation over basins with large areas or limited observed data.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 78 条
  • [1] Streamflow Prediction at the Intersection of Physics and Machine Learning: A Case Study of Two Mediterranean-Climate Watersheds
    Adera, S.
    Bellugi, D.
    Dhakal, A.
    Larsen, L.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2024, 60 (07)
  • [2] Goodness-of-fit criteria for hydrological models: Model calibration and performance assessment
    Althoff, Daniel
    Rodrigues, Lineu Neiva
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2021, 600
  • [3] Ao T., 1999, Proc. Hydraul. Eng, V43, P7, DOI DOI 10.2208/PROHE.43.7
  • [4] Simulating runoff under changing climatic conditions: A comparison of the long short-term memory network with two conceptual hydrologic models
    Bai, Peng
    Liu, Xiaomang
    Xie, Jiaxin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2021, 592
  • [5] Improving the interpretability and predictive power of hydrological models: Applications for daily streamflow in managed and unmanaged catchments
    Bhasme, Pravin
    Bhatia, Udit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2024, 628
  • [6] Hydrological model parameter instability: A source of additional uncertainty in estimating the hydrological impacts of climate change?
    Brigode, Pierre
    Oudin, Ludovic
    Perrin, Charles
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2013, 476 : 410 - 425
  • [7] Interpretable vs. noninterpretable machine learning models for data-driven hydro-climatological process modeling ®
    Chakraborty, Debaditya
    Basagaoglu, Hakan
    Winterle, James
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2021, 170
  • [8] Improving daily streamflow simulations for data-scarce watersheds using the coupled SWAT-LSTM approach
    Chen, Shengyue
    Huang, Jinliang
    Huang, Jr-Chuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2023, 622
  • [9] XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
    Chen, Tianqi
    Guestrin, Carlos
    [J]. KDD'16: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2016, : 785 - 794
  • [10] Improving streamflow prediction in the WRF-Hydro model with LSTM networks
    Cho, Kyeungwoo
    Kim, Yeonjoo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2022, 605