Non-invasive prenatal testing: Assessing the availability and accessibility of information available to the pregnant population within the Republic of Ireland

被引:0
作者
McMahon, Gabriela [1 ]
Kennedy, Sarah [1 ]
Miremberg, Hadas [1 ]
O'Donoghue, Keelin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Cork, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Pregnancy Loss Res Grp, Cork, Ireland
[2] Univ Coll Cork, INFANT Res Ctr, Cork, Ireland
关键词
Non-invasive prenatal testing; Population screening; FREE FETAL DNA; CELL-FREE DNA; MATERNAL PLASMA; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.09.014
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: While non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been widely adopted throughout Europe, Australia, and the USA, population level access to NIPT varies considerably. Ireland has no national screening programme for fetal anomalies, although NIPT is available from out-of-country providers. We aimed to describe the availability of NIPT in Ireland and the quality of information available online from NIPT providers. Methods: Information available online from NIPT providers in the Republic of Ireland was analysed by examining all healthcare facilities websites and reviewing private health insurance directories. Data on information provided by NIPT providers was collected by two independent researchers from April to May 2023. Results: Four of the 19 maternity hospitals/units in Ireland had information on NIPT on their websites, with three including an explanation of NIPT, testing accuracy, and associated fees (<euro>380-480). Twenty private clinics led by obstetric consultants advertised NIPT online, of which seventeen clinics included an explanation of NIPT, testing accuracy, and associated fees (<euro>380-<euro>650). Twenty-nine other providers, which included ultrasound clinics, direct-to-consumer laboratory testing, and General Practitioners, advertised NIPT with 18 of these providers including an explanation of NIPT, testing accuracy, and associated fees (<euro>179-<euro>630). Conclusion: While there is apparent demand for NIPT and it is available in Ireland, there is disparity between providers on the type and quality of information available. Difficulty obtaining accessible information, the associated financial costs and location of providers advertising NIPT are likely to be barriers to accessing NIPT. A national screening programme for aneuploidy should be considered to ensure both equitable access to and reliable information about prenatal screening.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 154
页数:6
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Procedure-related risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Akolekar, R.
    Beta, J.
    Picciarelli, G.
    Ogilvie, C.
    D'Antonio, F.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 45 (01) : 16 - 26
  • [2] Free fetal DNA in maternal plasma in anembryonic pregnancies: confirmation that the origin is the trophoblast
    Alberry, M.
    Maddocks, D.
    Jones, M.
    Hadi, M. Abdel
    Abdel-Fattah, S.
    Avent, N.
    Soothill, P. W.
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2007, 27 (05) : 415 - 418
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, Non-invasive prenatal testing: ethical issues
  • [4] First-trimester screening strategies: A balance between costs, efficiency and diagnostic yield
    Bardi, Francesca
    Kagan, Karl Oliver
    Bilardo, Caterina Maddalena
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2023, 43 (07) : 865 - 872
  • [5] The value of non-invasive prenatal testing: preferences of Canadian pregnant women, their partners, and health professionals regarding NIPT use and access
    Birko, Stanislav
    Ravitsky, Vardit
    Dupras, Charles
    Le Clerc-Blain, Jessica
    Lemoine, Marie-Eve
    Affdal, Aliya O.
    Haidar, Hazar
    Laberge, Anne-Marie
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [6] Bjerregaard L, 2017, DAN MED J, V64
  • [7] Noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) for fetal chromosome abnormalities in a general-risk population: An evidence-based clinical guideline of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)
    Dungan, Jeffrey S.
    Klugman, Susan
    Darilek, Sandra
    Malinowski, Jennifer
    Akkari, Yassmine M. N.
    Monaghan, Kristin G.
    Erwin, Angelika
    Best, Robert G.
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 25 (02)
  • [8] electronic Irish Statute Book (eISB), 2018, Health (Regulation of Termination of Pregnancy) ACT 2018
  • [9] Effectiveness of alternative prenatal genetic counselling methods in a cohort of pregnant women from a low socio-economic population
    Ellis, Katie Battese
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2022, 62 (05) : 674 - 680
  • [10] Eurofins, PRENATALSAFE - NON-INVASIVE PRENATAL TESTING