Corporate governance, firm risk and firm performance: the moderating role of group affiliation

被引:1
作者
Jha, Ratish Kumar [1 ]
Kalita, Niva [1 ]
Tiwari, Reshma Kumari [1 ]
机构
[1] Tezpur Univ, Dept Commerce, Tezpur, India
关键词
Corporate governance; Group affiliation; Firm risk; Firm performance; GENDER DIVERSITY; EMERGING MARKETS; BUSINESS GROUPS; BOARD; OWNERSHIP; RESPONSIBILITY; VOLATILITY;
D O I
10.1108/ARA-04-2024-0106
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to determine the moderating effect of group affiliation (GA) while examining the relationship of corporate governance (CG) with firm performance (FP) and firm risk-taking (FRT).Design/methodology/approachThe study employed a sample of 100 non-financial firms, selected randomly from the top 500 companies listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) based on their market capitalisation for 2013-2022. The random effects and fixed effect models are employed for the analysis. Furthermore, the generalised estimating equations (GEE) population-averaged model is used for added robustness.FindingsThe results reveal that while strong CG improves FP, GA modifies the effect of CG on FP. Both GA and CG have beneficial effects, but their synergy is insignificant. However, in the context of CG and FRT, the study unveils that a strong CG is associated with a reduction in FRT, and this relationship is more pronounced for standalone firms.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors' knowledge, the present study is a maiden attempt to investigate the moderating effect of GA while examining the relationship of CG with FP and FRT.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 340
页数:21
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]   Overview of Corporate Governance Research in India: A Bibliometric Analysis [J].
Abhilash, Abhilash ;
Shenoy, Sandeep S. ;
Shetty, Dasharathraj K. .
COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2023, 10 (01)
[2]   Board diversity and firm performance: The role of business group affiliation [J].
Aggarwal, Raj ;
Jindal, Varun ;
Seth, Rama .
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2019, 28 (06)
[3]  
Al Smadi M.O., 2019, Invest. Manag. Financ. Innov., V16, P79, DOI DOI 10.21511/IMFI.16(1).2019.06
[4]   Corporate governance mechanisms and R&D intensity in OECD courtiers [J].
AlHares, Aws .
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2020, 20 (05) :863-885
[5]   Board structure and corporate R&D intensity: evidence from Forbes global 2000 [J].
AlHares, Aws ;
Elamer, Ahmed A. ;
Alshbili, Ibrahem ;
Moustafa, Maha W. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2020, 28 (03) :445-463
[6]   Business Groups and Corporate Responsibility for the Public Good [J].
Ararat, Melsa ;
Colpan, Asli M. ;
Matten, Dirk .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2018, 153 (04) :911-929
[7]   Corporate governance and firm performance in developing countries: evidence from India [J].
Arora, Akshita ;
Sharma, Chandan .
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2016, 16 (02) :420-436
[8]  
Bagais O. A., 2020, Accounting, V6, P923, DOI [10.5267/j.ac.2020.8.005, DOI 10.5267/J.AC.2020.8.005]
[9]   Stabilizing or destabilizing: the effect of institutional investors on stock return volatility in an emerging market [J].
Batra, Shallu ;
Yadav, Mahender ;
Jindal, Ishu ;
Saini, Mohit ;
Kumar, Pankaj .
MULTINATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2024, 32 (02) :204-225
[10]   Board effectiveness: Evidence from firm risk [J].
Baulkaran, Vishaal ;
Bhattarai, Sagar .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2020, 110