Cascading Failure in Cyber-Physical Systems: A Review on Failure Modeling and Vulnerability Analysis

被引:2
作者
He, Sizhe [1 ]
Zhou, Yadong [1 ]
Yang, Yujie [1 ]
Liu, Ting [1 ]
Zhou, Yuxun [2 ]
Li, Jie [3 ]
Wu, Tong [1 ]
Guan, Xiaohong [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, MOE KLINNS Lab, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Rowan Univ, ECE Dept, Glassboro, NJ 08028 USA
[4] Tsinghua Univ, Ctr Intelligentand Networked Syst, Dept Automat, Tsinghua Natl Lab Informat Sci & Technol, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Cascading failure; cyber-physical systems (CPSs) security; failure modeling; vulnerability analysis; POWER-SYSTEMS; RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT; COMPLEX NETWORKS; RISK-ASSESSMENT; SMART GRIDS; SECURITY; ROBUSTNESS; RESILIENCE; NODE; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1109/TCYB.2024.3411868
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Cascading failures pose a significant security threat to networked systems, with recent global incidents underscoring their destructive potential. The security threat of cascading failures has always existed, but the evolution of cyber-physical systems (CPSs) has introduced novel dimensions to cascading failures, intensifying their threats owing to the intricate fusion of cyber and physical domains. Addressing these threats requires a nuanced understanding achieved through failure modeling and vulnerability analysis. By analyzing the historical failures in different CPSs, the cascading failure in CPSs is comprehensively defined as a complicated propagation process in coupled cyber and physical systems, initialized by natural accidents or human interference, which exhibits a progressive evolution within the networked structure and ultimately results in unexpected large-scale systemic failures. Subsequently, this study advances the development of instructions for modeling cascading failures and conducting vulnerability analyses within CPSs. The examination also delves into the core challenges inherent in these methodologies. Moreover, a comprehensive survey and classification of extant research methodologies and solutions are undertaken, accompanied by a concise evaluation of their advancements and limitations. To validate the performance of these methodologies, numerical experiments are conducted to ascertain their distinct features. In conclusion, this article advocates for future research initiatives, particularly emphasizing the exploration of uncertainty analysis, defense strategies, and verification platforms. By addressing these areas, the resilience of CPSs against cascading failures can be significantly enhanced.
引用
收藏
页码:7936 / 7954
页数:19
相关论文
共 142 条
[1]   Structural vulnerability of the North American power grid [J].
Albert, R ;
Albert, I ;
Nakarado, GL .
PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2004, 69 (02) :025103-1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, TECHN REP EV 9 AUG 2
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Stuxnet: Cyberwar Revolution in Military Affairs
[4]  
[Anonymous], ELECT DISTURBANCE EV
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Preliminary Report-Black system Event in South Australia,
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Defense Use Case: Analysis of the Cyber Attack on the Ukrainian Power Grid, V388, P1
[7]   Special issue on hybrid systems: Theory and applications - A brief introduction to the theory and applications of hybrid systems [J].
Antsaklis, PJ .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2000, 88 (07) :879-887
[8]   Stochastic Cascading Failure Model With Uncertain Generation Using Unscented Transform [J].
Athari, Mir Hadi ;
Wang, Zhifang .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2020, 11 (02) :1067-1077
[9]   Impacts of Wind Power Uncertainty on Grid Vulnerability to Cascading Overload Failures [J].
Athari, Mir Hadi ;
Wang, Zhifang .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2018, 9 (01) :128-137
[10]  
Barrett Chris., 2010, Critical Infrastructure (CRIS), 2010 5th International Conference on, P1, DOI DOI 10.1109/CRIS.2010.5617569