A fractional Hawkes process model for earthquake aftershock sequences

被引:1
作者
Davis, Louis [1 ]
Baeumer, Boris [1 ]
Wang, Ting [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Dept Math & Stat, POB 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
关键词
information gain; maximum likelihood; point process; residual analysis; seismics activity; RESIDUAL ANALYSIS; POINT-PROCESSES; ETAS MODELS; FORECASTS; LAW; SIMULATION; CATALOGS;
D O I
10.1093/jrsssc/qlae031
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
A new type of Hawkes process, known as the fractional Hawkes Process (FHP), has been recently introduced. This process uses a Mittag-Leffler density as the kernel function which is asymptotically a power law and so similar to the Omori-Utsu law, suggesting the FHP may be an appropriate earthquake model. However, it is currently an unmarked point process meaning it is independent of an earthquake's magnitude. We extend the existing FHP, by incorporating Utsu's aftershock productivity law and a time-scaling parameter from the fractional Zener Model to a marked version so that it may better model earthquake aftershock sequences. We call this model the 'Seismic Fractional Hawkes Process' (SFHP). We then estimate parameters via maximum likelihood and provide evidence for these estimates being consistent and asymptotically normal via a simulation study. The SFHP is then compared to the epidemic type aftershock sequence and FHP models on four aftershock sequences from Southern California and New Zealand. While it is inconclusive if the seismic fractional Hawkes process performs better in a retrospective predictive performance experiment, it does perform favourably against both models in terms of information criteria and residual diagnostics especially when the aftershock clustering is stronger.
引用
收藏
页码:1185 / 1202
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Aftershock forecasts based on incomplete earthquake catalogues: ETASI model application to the 2023 SE Türkiye earthquake sequence
    Hainzl, Sebastian
    Kumazawa, Takao
    Ogata, Yosihiko
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 236 (03) : 1609 - 1620
  • [22] An estimation procedure for the Hawkes process
    Kirchner, Matthias
    [J]. QUANTITATIVE FINANCE, 2017, 17 (04) : 571 - 595
  • [23] Predicting Water Pipe Failures with a Recurrent Neural Hawkes Process Model
    Verheugd, Jeroen
    da Costa, Paulo R. de Oliveira
    Afshar, Reza Refaei
    Zhang, Yingqian
    Boersma, Sjoerd
    [J]. 2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC), 2020, : 2628 - 2633
  • [24] Likelihood based inference for the multivariate renewal Hawkes process
    Stindl, Tom
    Chen, Feng
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2018, 123 : 131 - 145
  • [25] The Analysis of the Aftershock Sequences of the Recent Mainshocks in Alaska
    Sedghizadeh, Mohammadamin
    Shcherbakov, Robert
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [26] Analysis of aftershock sequences in South and Southeastern Spain
    Hamdache, M.
    Pelaez, J. A.
    Talbi, A.
    [J]. PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2013, 63 : 55 - 76
  • [27] A Nonparametric Hawkes Model for Forecasting California Seismicity
    Gordon, Joshua Seth
    Fox, Eric Warren
    Schoenberg, Frederic Paik
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2021, 111 (04) : 2216 - 2234
  • [28] Analysis of Earthquake Data Based on Space-Time Epidemic Type Aftershock Sequence Model
    Pratiwi, Hasih
    Subanar
    Danardono
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS & STATISTICS, 2014, 52 (02): : 55 - 62
  • [29] SPATIALLY INHOMOGENEOUS BACKGROUND RATE ESTIMATORS AND UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION FOR NONPARAMETRIC HAWKES POINT PROCESS MODELS OF EARTHQUAKE OCCURRENCES
    Fox, Eric Warren
    Schoenberg, Frederic Paik
    Gordon, Joshua Seth
    [J]. ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2016, 10 (03) : 1725 - 1756
  • [30] Estimating the Hawkes Process From a Discretely Observed Sample Path
    Chen, Feng
    Kwan, Tsz-Kit Jeffrey
    Stindl, Tom
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICS, 2025,