Udder health outcomes in Irish herds participating in CellCheck dry cow consults

被引:0
|
作者
Caballero-Villalobos, J. [1 ,2 ]
Ryan, E. G. [3 ]
McGrath, M. [4 ]
O'Grady, L. [3 ]
McAloon, C. G. [3 ]
Graham, D. A. [4 ]
McCoy, F. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cordoba, Dept Prod Anim, Cordoba 14071, Spain
[2] Teagasc Anim & Biosci Res Dept, Dunsany C15 PW93, Co Meath, Ireland
[3] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Vet Med, Sect Herd Hlth & Anim Husb, Dublin D04 V1W8, Ireland
[4] Anim Hlth Ireland, Carrick On Shannon N41 WN27, Co Leitrim, Ireland
关键词
dairy cows; selective dry cow therapy; antimicrobial resistance; SOMATIC-CELL COUNT; DAIRY HERDS; THERAPY; MASTITIS; MANAGEMENT; PATHOGENS;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2024-24751
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The CellCheck dry cow consult (DCC) was developed by the CellCheck Technical Working Group to enable farmers to engage with their nominated veterinarian to develop farm-specific selective dry cow therapy (SDCT) plans, where appropriate. This study evaluated the effect of the DCC on farmer decision-making around dry cow therapy, and the udder health effects of implementing SDCT, in study herds over the 2019 and 2020 dry periods. The DCC was a 3-h consult, delivered and funded as part of the Targeted Advisory Service on Animal Health. Herds that completed a DCC were invited to register for a dry cow review the following year. The combined dataset for analysis across both years comprised 439 herds and 25,357 cows. Herd size ranged from 25 to 800. The median SCC of cows dried off with teat sealant only was 47,000 cells/mL before drying off in 2019 and 48,000 cells/mL at first milk recording in 2020, and 43,000 cells/ mL before drying off in 2020 and 39,000 cells/mL at first milking recording in 2021. Following both the 2019 and 2020 dry periods, cows tended to converge toward a similar median SCC early in the following lactation, irrespective of prior dry cow treatment strategy. The uptake of SDCT was greater in review herds, with 21% of cows receiving teat sealant only in 2020, compared with 16.3% of cows in herds participating in a consult for the first time in 2020. At an individual cow level, in both years dry period new infection rate (NIR) was approximately 2.7% higher for cows treated with teat sealant only, than for those treated with both dry cow antibiotic tubes and teat sealant, and 1.2% higher than cows treated with antibiotic only. Regardless of treatment, a significant association was detectable between increasing parity and the risk of a dry period new infection. Increasing herd size had a significant effect on the risk of dry period NIR. At a herd level, no significant increase in NIR occurred when SDCT was used compared with herds where blanket dry cow therapy was used. Though not without risk, SDCT can be successfully implemented in Irish herds; however, constant attention to hygiene and management is essential. Despite the challenges, facilitating continued farmer education and engagement with professional guidance will be important.
引用
收藏
页码:8387 / 8401
页数:15
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] The Effect of Selective Dry Cow Treatment on the Udder Health in Swiss Dairy Farms
    Bucher, B.
    Bleul, U.
    SCHWEIZER ARCHIV FUR TIERHEILKUNDE, 2019, 161 (09): : 533 - 544
  • [2] Impact of Selective Dry Cow Therapy on Antimicrobial Consumption, Udder Health, Milk Yield, and Culling Hazard in Commercial Dairy Herds
    Lipkens, Zyncke
    Piepers, Sofie
    De Vliegher, Sarne
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2023, 12 (05):
  • [3] Dry cow therapy and early lactation udder health problems-Associations and risk factors
    Niemi, R. E.
    Hovinen, M.
    Vilar, M. J.
    Simojoki, H.
    Rajala-Schultz, P. J.
    PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2021, 188
  • [4] Effects of reduced intramammary antimicrobial use during the dry period on udder health in Dutch dairy herds
    Vanhoudt, A.
    van Hees-Huijps, K.
    van Knegsel, A. T. M.
    Sampimon, O. C.
    Vernooij, J. C. M.
    Nielen, M.
    van Werven, T.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2018, 101 (04) : 3248 - 3260
  • [5] Cow characteristics and their association with udder health after different dry period lengths
    van Hoeij, R. J.
    Lam, T. J. G. M.
    de Koning, D. B.
    Steeneveld, W.
    Kemp, B.
    van Knegsel, A. T. M.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2016, 99 (10) : 8330 - 8340
  • [6] Effect of the Selective Dry Cow Therapy on Udder Health and Milk Microbiota
    Pavesi, Laura Filippone
    Pollera, Claudia
    Sala, Giulia
    Cremonesi, Paola
    Monistero, Valentina
    Biscarini, Filippo
    Bronzo, Valerio
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2023, 12 (08):
  • [7] Effect of prepartum dry cow antibiotic treatment in dairy heifers on udder health and milk production
    Sampimon, O. C.
    De Vliegher, S.
    Barkema, H. W.
    Sol, J.
    Lam, T. J. G. M.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2009, 92 (09) : 4395 - 4403
  • [8] Effect of selective dry cow treatment on udder health and antimicrobial usage on Dutch dairy farms
    Tijs, S. H. W.
    Holstege, M. M. C.
    Scherpenzeel, C. G. M.
    Santman-Berends, I. M. G. A.
    Velthuis, A. G. J.
    Lam, T. J. G. M.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2022, 105 (06) : 5381 - 5392
  • [9] Internal teat sealants alone or in combination with antibiotics at dry-off - the effect on udder health in dairy cows in five commercial herds
    Clabby, C.
    McParland, S.
    Dillon, P.
    Arkins, S.
    Flynn, J.
    Murphy, J.
    Bolona, P. Silva
    ANIMAL, 2022, 16 (02)
  • [10] Making good decisions on dry cow management to improve udder health - Synthesising evidence in a Bayesian framework
    Green, M.
    Huxley, J.
    Madouasse, A.
    Browne, W.
    Medley, G.
    Bradley, A.
    Biggs, A.
    Breen, J.
    Burne, M.
    Hayton, A.
    Husband, J.
    Reader, J.
    Statham, J.
    CATTLE PRACTICE, 2007, 15 : 201 - 206