Enhancing knowledge tracing with concept map and response disentanglement

被引:1
作者
Park, Soonwook [1 ]
Lee, Donghoon [2 ]
Park, Hogun [1 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Artificial Intelligence, 2066 Seobu Ro, Suwon 16419, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[2] Poly Inspirat, Dept AI Dev, 201 Songpa Daero, Seoul 05854, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Knowledge tracing; Concept map; Multiple choice questions; Disentangled representation; Interpretability;
D O I
10.1016/j.knosys.2024.112346
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In the rapidly advancing realm of educational technology, it becomes critical to accurately trace and understand student knowledge states. Conventional Knowledge Tracing (KT) models have mainly focused on binary responses (i.e., i . e ., correct and incorrect answers) to questions. Unfortunately, they largely overlook the essential information in students' actual answer choices, particularly for Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs), which could help reveal each learner's misconceptions or knowledge gaps. To tackle these challenges, we propose the Concept map-driven Response disentanglement method for enhancing Knowledge Tracing (CRKT) model. CRKT benefits KT by directly leveraging answer choices - beyond merely identifying correct or incorrect answers - to distinguish responses with different incorrect choices. We further introduce the novel use of unchosen responses by employing disentangled representations to get insights from options not selected by students. Additionally, CRKT tracks the student's knowledge state at the concept level and encodes the concept map, representing the relationships between them, to better predict unseen concepts. This approach is expected to provide actionable feedback, improving the learning experience. Our comprehensive experiments across multiple datasets demonstrate CRKT's effectiveness, achieving superior performance in prediction accuracy and interpretability over state-of-the-art models.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 41 条
[11]  
CORBETT AT, 1994, USER MODEL USER-ADAP, V4, P253, DOI 10.1007/BF01099821
[12]   Structured information extraction from scientific text with large language models [J].
Dagdelen, John ;
Dunn, Alexander ;
Lee, Sanghoon ;
Walker, Nicholas ;
Rosen, Andrew S. ;
Ceder, Gerbrand ;
Persson, Kristin A. ;
Jain, Anubhav .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 15 (01)
[13]  
Embretson S. E., 2013, Item response theory
[14]   RCD: Relation Map Driven Cognitive Diagnosis for Intelligent Education Systems [J].
Gao, Weibo ;
Liu, Qi ;
Huang, Zhenya ;
Yin, Yu ;
Bi, Haoyang ;
Wang, Mu-Chun ;
Ma, Jianhui ;
Wang, Shijin ;
Su, Yu .
SIGIR '21 - PROCEEDINGS OF THE 44TH INTERNATIONAL ACM SIGIR CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, 2021, :501-510
[15]   Option Tracing: Beyond Correctness Analysis in Knowledge Tracing [J].
Ghosh, Aritra ;
Raspat, Jay ;
Lan, Andrew .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION (AIED 2021), PT I, 2021, 12748 :137-149
[16]   Context-Aware Attentive Knowledge Tracing [J].
Ghosh, Aritra ;
Heffernan, Neil ;
Lan, Andrew S. .
KDD '20: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY & DATA MINING, 2020, :2330-2339
[17]  
Higgins I., 2017, ICLR (Poster), P1
[18]  
Kipf T. N., 2017, P INT C LEARN REPR, DOI DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1609.02907
[19]  
Lan A. S., 2015, P 2 ACM C LEARN SCAL, P167, DOI [10.1145/2724660.2724664, DOI 10.1145/2724660.2724664]
[20]   Contrastive Learning for Knowledge Tracing [J].
Lee, Wonsung ;
Chun, Jaeyoon ;
Lee, Youngmin ;
Park, Kyoungsoo ;
Park, Sungrae .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACM WEB CONFERENCE 2022 (WWW'22), 2022, :2330-2338