Accuracy of deep learning in the differential diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Tu, Li [1 ]
Deng, Ying [1 ]
Chen, Yun [1 ]
Luo, Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Med Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Dis, Branch 1, Affiliated Hosp 1, 191 Renmin Rd, Chongqing 400012, Peoples R China
来源
BMC MEDICAL IMAGING | 2024年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Coronary artery stenosis; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; ANGIOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1186/s12880-024-01403-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background In recent years, as deep learning has received widespread attention in the field of heart disease, some studies have explored the potential of deep learning based on coronary angiography (CAG) or coronary CT angiography (CCTA) images in detecting the extent of coronary artery stenosis. However, there is still a lack of a systematic understanding of its diagnostic accuracy, impeding the advancement of intelligent diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis. Therefore, we conducted this study to review the accuracy of image-based deep learning in detecting coronary artery stenosis. Methods We retrieved PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science until April 11, 2023. The risk of bias in the included studies was appraised using the QUADAS-2 tool. We extracted the accuracy of deep learning in the test set and performed subgroup analyses by binary and multiclass classification scenarios. We performed a subgroup analysis based on different degrees of stenosis and applied a double arcsine transformation to process the data. The analysis was done by using R. Results Our systematic review finally included 18 studies, involving 3568 patients and 13,362 images. In the included studies, deep learning models were constructed based on CAG and CCTA. In binary classification tasks, the accuracy for detecting > 25%, > 50% and > 70% degrees of stenosis at the vessel level were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.71-0.85), 0.73 (95% CI: 0.58-0.88) and 0.61 (95% CI: 0.56-0.65), respectively. In multiclass classification tasks, the accuracy for detecting 0-25%, 25-50%, 50-70%, and 70-100% degrees of stenosis at the vessel level were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.73-0.84), 0.86 (95% CI: 0.78-0.93), 0.83 (95% CI: 0.70-0.97), and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.42-0.98), respectively. Conclusions Our study shows that deep learning models based on CAG and CCTA appear to be relatively accurate in diagnosing different degrees of coronary artery stenosis. However, for various degrees of stenosis, their accuracy still needs to be further improved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Diagnostic Accuracy of Deep Learning and Radiomics in Lung Cancer Staging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zheng, Xiushan
    He, Bo
    Hu, Yunhai
    Ren, Min
    Chen, Zhiyuan
    Zhang, Zhiguang
    Ma, Jun
    Ouyang, Lanwei
    Chu, Hongmei
    Gao, Huan
    He, Wenjing
    Liu, Tianhu
    Li, Gang
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10 : 938113
  • [42] Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning using speech samples in depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Lidan
    Liu, Lu
    Wafa, Hatem A.
    Tydeman, Florence
    Xie, Wanqing
    Wang, Yanzhong
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2024, 31 (10) : 2394 - 2404
  • [43] Diagnostic accuracy of deep learning-based algorithms in laryngoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Du, Shengyi
    Guo, Jin
    Huang, Donghai
    Liu, Yong
    Zhang, Xin
    Lu, Shanhong
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2025, 282 (01) : 351 - 360
  • [44] Accuracy of vestibular schwannoma segmentation using deep learning models - a systematic review & meta-analysis
    Lajczak, Pawel
    Matyja, Jakub
    Jozwik, Kamil
    Nawrat, Zbigniew
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2025, 67 (03) : 729 - 742
  • [45] Deep Learning for Pneumothorax Detection on Chest Radiograph: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Systematic Review and Meta Analysis
    Katzman, Benjamin D.
    Alabousi, Mostafa
    Islam, Nabil
    Zha, Nanxi
    Patlas, Michael N.
    CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2024, 75 (03): : 525 - 533
  • [46] Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for detection of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Di Leo, Giovanni
    Fisci, Erica
    Secchi, Francesco
    Ali, Marco
    Ambrogi, Federico
    Sconfienza, Luca Maria
    Sardanelli, Francesco
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (10) : 3706 - 3718
  • [47] Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Based Technologies for the Diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Manetas-Stavrakakis, Nikolaos
    Sotiropoulou, Ioanna Myrto
    Paraskevas, Themistoklis
    Stavrakaki, Stefania Maneta
    Bampatsias, Dimitrios
    Xanthopoulos, Andrew
    Papageorgiou, Nikolaos
    Briasoulis, Alexandros
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (20)
  • [48] Deep-learning CT reconstruction in clinical scans of the abdomen: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mostafa A. Shehata
    Abdelrahman M. Saad
    Serageldin Kamel
    Nir Stanietzky
    Alicia M. Roman-Colon
    Ajaykumar C. Morani
    Khaled M. Elsayes
    Corey T. Jensen
    Abdominal Radiology, 2023, 48 : 2724 - 2756
  • [49] Deep learning versus ophthalmologists for screening for glaucoma on fundus examination: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Buisson, Mathieu
    Navel, Valentin
    Labbe, Antoine
    Watson, Stephanie L.
    Baker, Julien S.
    Murtagh, Patrick
    Chiambaretta, Frederic
    Dutheil, Frederic
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 49 (09) : 1027 - 1038
  • [50] Deep Learning Models Used in the Diagnostic Workup of Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Exploratory Meta-Analysis
    Bodmer, Nicolas S.
    Christensen, Dylan G.
    Bachmann, Lucas M.
    Faes, Livia
    Sanak, Frantisek
    Iselin, Katja
    Kaufmann, Claude
    Thiel, Michael A.
    Baenninger, Philipp B.
    CORNEA, 2024, 43 (07) : 916 - 931