Accuracy of deep learning in the differential diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Tu, Li [1 ]
Deng, Ying [1 ]
Chen, Yun [1 ]
Luo, Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Med Univ, Dept Cardiovasc Dis, Branch 1, Affiliated Hosp 1, 191 Renmin Rd, Chongqing 400012, Peoples R China
来源
BMC MEDICAL IMAGING | 2024年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Coronary artery stenosis; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; ANGIOGRAPHY; PERFORMANCE; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1186/s12880-024-01403-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background In recent years, as deep learning has received widespread attention in the field of heart disease, some studies have explored the potential of deep learning based on coronary angiography (CAG) or coronary CT angiography (CCTA) images in detecting the extent of coronary artery stenosis. However, there is still a lack of a systematic understanding of its diagnostic accuracy, impeding the advancement of intelligent diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis. Therefore, we conducted this study to review the accuracy of image-based deep learning in detecting coronary artery stenosis. Methods We retrieved PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science until April 11, 2023. The risk of bias in the included studies was appraised using the QUADAS-2 tool. We extracted the accuracy of deep learning in the test set and performed subgroup analyses by binary and multiclass classification scenarios. We performed a subgroup analysis based on different degrees of stenosis and applied a double arcsine transformation to process the data. The analysis was done by using R. Results Our systematic review finally included 18 studies, involving 3568 patients and 13,362 images. In the included studies, deep learning models were constructed based on CAG and CCTA. In binary classification tasks, the accuracy for detecting > 25%, > 50% and > 70% degrees of stenosis at the vessel level were 0.81 (95% CI: 0.71-0.85), 0.73 (95% CI: 0.58-0.88) and 0.61 (95% CI: 0.56-0.65), respectively. In multiclass classification tasks, the accuracy for detecting 0-25%, 25-50%, 50-70%, and 70-100% degrees of stenosis at the vessel level were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.73-0.84), 0.86 (95% CI: 0.78-0.93), 0.83 (95% CI: 0.70-0.97), and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.42-0.98), respectively. Conclusions Our study shows that deep learning models based on CAG and CCTA appear to be relatively accurate in diagnosing different degrees of coronary artery stenosis. However, for various degrees of stenosis, their accuracy still needs to be further improved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Deep learning assisted segmentation of the lumbar intervertebral disc: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Aobo
    Zou, Congying
    Yuan, Shuo
    Fan, Ning
    Du, Peng
    Wang, Tianyi
    Zang, Lei
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 19 (01):
  • [32] Systematic review and meta-analysis of test accuracy for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism
    Patel, Parth
    Patel, Payal
    Bhatt, Meha
    Braun, Cody
    Begum, Housne
    Wiercioch, Wojtek
    Varghese, Jamie
    Wooldridge, David
    Alturkmani, Hani
    Thomas, Merrill
    Baig, Mariam
    Bahaj, Waled
    Khatib, Rasha
    Kehar, Rohan
    Ponnapureddy, Rakesh
    Sethi, Anchal
    Mustafa, Ahmad
    Lim, Wendy
    Le Gal, Gregoire
    Bates, Shannon M.
    Haramati, Linda B.
    Kline, Jeffrey
    Lang, Eddy
    Righini, Marc
    Kalot, Mohamad A.
    Husainat, Nedaa M.
    Al Jabiri, Yazan Nayif
    Schunemann, Holger J.
    Mustafa, Reem A.
    BLOOD ADVANCES, 2020, 4 (18) : 4296 - 4311
  • [33] Deep learning for cephalometric landmark detection: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Schwendicke, Falk
    Chaurasia, Akhilanand
    Arsiwala, Lubaina
    Lee, Jae-Hong
    Elhennawy, Karim
    Jost-Brinkmann, Paul-Georg
    Demarco, Flavio
    Krois, Joachim
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 25 (07) : 4299 - 4309
  • [34] Deep learning models for tendinopathy detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic tests
    Droppelmann, Guillermo
    Rodriguez, Constanza
    Smague, Dali
    Jorquera, Carlos
    Feijoo, Felipe
    EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2024, 9 (10) : 941 - 952
  • [35] Deep learning for cephalometric landmark detection: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Falk Schwendicke
    Akhilanand Chaurasia
    Lubaina Arsiwala
    Jae-Hong Lee
    Karim Elhennawy
    Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann
    Flavio Demarco
    Joachim Krois
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2021, 25 : 4299 - 4309
  • [36] Accuracy of deep learning for automated detection of pneumonia using chest X-Ray images: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Yuanyuan
    Zhang, Zhenyan
    Dai, Cong
    Dong, Qiang
    Badrigilan, Samireh
    COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2020, 123
  • [37] Deep learning for tooth identification and numbering on dental radiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sadr, Soroush
    Rokhshad, Rata
    Daghighi, Yasaman
    Golkar, Mohsen
    Tolooie Kheybari, Fateme
    Gorjinejad, Fatemeh
    Mataji Kojori, Atousa
    Rahimirad, Parisa
    Shobeiri, Parnian
    Mahdian, Mina
    Mohammad-Rahimi, Hossein
    DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 53 (01) : 5 - 21
  • [38] Sensitivity and specificity of machine learning and deep learning algorithms in the diagnosis of thoracolumbar injuries resulting in vertebral fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Beculic, Hakija
    Begagic, Emir
    Dzidic-Krivic, Amina
    Pugonja, Ragib
    Softic, Namira
    Basic, Binasa
    Balogun, Simon
    Nuhovic, Adem
    Softic, Emir
    Ljevakovic, Adnana
    Sefo, Haso
    Segalo, Sabina
    Skomorac, Rasim
    Pojskic, Mirza
    BRAIN AND SPINE, 2024, 4
  • [39] Percutaneous intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery in left main coronary artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Xin-Lin
    Zhu, Qing-Qing
    Yang, Jing-Jing
    Chen, Yu-Han
    Li, Yang
    Zhu, Su-Hui
    Xie, Jun
    Wang, Lian
    Kang, Li-Na
    Xu, Biao
    BMC MEDICINE, 2017, 15
  • [40] Accuracy of Machine Learning Assisted Detection of Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Cao, Ke
    Verspoor, Karin
    Sahebjada, Srujana
    Baird, Paul N.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (03)