Consequentialism and the ideal theory debate in political philosophy

被引：0
作者：
Schmidt, Andreas T. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Groningen, Fac Philosophy, Oude Boteringestr 52, NL-9712 GL Groningen, Netherlands
来源：
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY | 2024年
关键词：
consequentialism; ideal theory; instrumentalism; methods of political theory; non-ideal theory; utilitarianism; DECISION-MAKING; JUSTICE; UTILITARIANISM; FEASIBILITY;
D O I：
10.1111/josp.12586
中图分类号：
B82 [伦理学（道德学）];
学科分类号：
摘要：
[No abstract available]
引用
收藏
页数：23
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
Adams Matthew., 2017, John Rawls: Debating the Major Questions, P73
[2]   OBJECTIVE CONSEQUENTIALISM AND THE RATIONALES OF ' "OUGHT" IMPLIES "CAN" ' [J].
Andric, Vuko .
RATIO, 2017, 30 (01) :72-87
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1848, Principles of Political Economy
[4]  
Bailey JamesW., 1997, UTILITARIANISM I JUS
[5]  
BALES RE, 1971, AM PHILOS QUART, V8, P257
[6]  
Barrett J., 2020, J ETHICS SOCIAL PHIL, V17, P103
[7]  
Barrett Jacob., 2023, Essays on Longtermism
[8]  
Barrett Jacob, 2022, 112022 GLOB PRIOR I
[9]  
Bentham Jeremy., 1876, INTRO PRINCIPLES MOR
[10]  
Brennan G., 2013, EXPLAINING NORMS
12345678