Examining the portfolio carbon footprint of Indian banking system

被引:5
作者
Jindal, Abhinav [1 ,2 ]
Hishikar, Saket [3 ,4 ]
Shrimali, Gireesh [5 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Management Indore, Econ Area, Indore, India
[2] Power Management Inst, Noida, India
[3] Gokhale Inst Polit & Econ, Pune, India
[4] Tilburg Univ, Tilburg, Netherlands
[5] Univ Oxford, Head Transit Finance Res, Oxford Sustainable Finance Grp, Oxford, England
关键词
Decarbonization; Emission accounting; Indian; Input-output analysis; Portfolio carbon footprint; Weighted average carbon intensity;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142393
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper examines the portfolio carbon footprint of Indian banking system. To this end, we combine the emissions data from India's Biennial Update Reports to UNFCCC and Reserve Bank of India's bank database from 2010 to 2016; apply Network for Greening the Financial System's backward-looking methodology and Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials Standards in conjunction with Leontief's Input-Output technique to estimate the weighted average carbon intensity (WACI) of bank's loans portfolio at three levels - System level, Bank group level and Spatial level. Our major findings include-first, at system level, the carbon footprint of Indian banks shows a rising trend over the study period with the aggregate WACI of bank loans increasing by 9.4% from 332.5 tCO2e/US$ million in 2010 to 363.7 tCO2e/US$ million in 2016. Second, at the group level, while the financed emissions of public sector banks have plateaued, for private sector banks they have nearly doubled during the study period, suggesting the increased exposure to carbon intensive assets. Third, on the spatial level, top five regions by WACI include Delhi, Maharashtra, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, and Telangana in descending order.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   A comparison of deflation methods for carbon footprint calculations using Japanese data [J].
Matsushima, Sora ;
Kagawa, Shigemi ;
Nansai, Keisuke ;
Xue, Jinjun .
ECONOMIC SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2024, 36 (03) :337-352
[42]   COMPARING THE GTAP-MRIO AND WIOD DATABASES FOR CARBON FOOTPRINT ANALYSIS [J].
Arto, Inaki ;
Rueda-Cantuche, Jose M. ;
Peters, Glen P. .
ECONOMIC SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2014, 26 (03) :327-353
[43]   Carbon Footprint and Decarbonization Potential of Battery-Grade Synthetic Graphite [J].
Wang, Fang ;
Zhang, Shaojun ;
Liu, Min ;
Xiong, Yiling ;
De Castro Gomez, Daniel ;
He, Xin ;
Almoniee, Mohammed A. ;
Perez, Omar Hurtado ;
Liu, Ziyu ;
Pan, Xuexing ;
Lin, Guangliang ;
Wu, Ye .
ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2025, 13 (22) :8298-8306
[44]   Detailed carbon footprint of long-term care in an aging society [J].
Kira, Narumi ;
Hata, Sho ;
Nansai, Keisuke ;
Shigetomi, Yosuke .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2025, 20 (08)
[45]   Promoting decarbonisation in the construction of new buildings: A strategy to calculate the Embodied Carbon Footprint [J].
Santos, Ana Karolina ;
Ferreira, Victor M. ;
Dias, Ana Claudia .
JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2025, 103
[46]   Key sectors in carbon footprint responsibility at the city level: a case study of Beijing [J].
Tian, Jing ;
Lumbreras, Julio ;
Andrade, Celio ;
Liao, Hua .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATE CHANGE STRATEGIES AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 9 (06) :749-776
[47]   Reducing the carbon footprint of lithium-ion batteries, what's next? [J].
Peiseler, Leopold ;
Wood, Vanessa ;
Schmidt, Tobias S. .
NEXT ENERGY, 2023, 1 (02)
[48]   Emissions in a decarbonised economy? Global lessons from a carbon footprint analysis of Iceland [J].
Clarke, Jack ;
Heinonen, Jukka ;
Ottelin, Juudit .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 166 :1175-1186
[49]   The Water Footprint of California's Energy System, 1990-2012 [J].
Fulton, Julian ;
Cooley, Heather .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 49 (06) :3314-3321
[50]   Supply Chain Factors Contributing to Improved Material Flow Indicators but Increased Carbon Footprint [J].
Hata, Sho ;
Nansai, Keisuke ;
Nakajima, Kenichi .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 57 (34) :12713-12721