Examining the portfolio carbon footprint of Indian banking system

被引:3
作者
Jindal, Abhinav [1 ,2 ]
Hishikar, Saket [3 ,4 ]
Shrimali, Gireesh [5 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Management Indore, Econ Area, Indore, India
[2] Power Management Inst, Noida, India
[3] Gokhale Inst Polit & Econ, Pune, India
[4] Tilburg Univ, Tilburg, Netherlands
[5] Univ Oxford, Head Transit Finance Res, Oxford Sustainable Finance Grp, Oxford, England
关键词
Decarbonization; Emission accounting; Indian; Input-output analysis; Portfolio carbon footprint; Weighted average carbon intensity;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142393
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper examines the portfolio carbon footprint of Indian banking system. To this end, we combine the emissions data from India's Biennial Update Reports to UNFCCC and Reserve Bank of India's bank database from 2010 to 2016; apply Network for Greening the Financial System's backward-looking methodology and Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials Standards in conjunction with Leontief's Input-Output technique to estimate the weighted average carbon intensity (WACI) of bank's loans portfolio at three levels - System level, Bank group level and Spatial level. Our major findings include-first, at system level, the carbon footprint of Indian banks shows a rising trend over the study period with the aggregate WACI of bank loans increasing by 9.4% from 332.5 tCO2e/US$ million in 2010 to 363.7 tCO2e/US$ million in 2016. Second, at the group level, while the financed emissions of public sector banks have plateaued, for private sector banks they have nearly doubled during the study period, suggesting the increased exposure to carbon intensive assets. Third, on the spatial level, top five regions by WACI include Delhi, Maharashtra, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, and Telangana in descending order.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Carbon footprint and embodied carbon transfer at the provincial level of the Yellow River Basin
    Yuan, Xueliang
    Sheng, Xuerou
    Chen, Leping
    Tang, Yuzhou
    Li, Yue
    Jia, Yanshuang
    Qu, Dongfang
    Wang, Qingsong
    Ma, Qiao
    Zuo, Jian
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 803
  • [22] On the Development of Technologies for Reducing Carbon Footprint in the Energy Sector
    Ryzhkov, A. F.
    Bogatova, T. F.
    Tugov, A. N.
    Maslennikov, G. E.
    Osipov, P., V
    Nikitin, A. D.
    COMBUSTION EXPLOSION AND SHOCK WAVES, 2022, 58 (04) : 494 - 506
  • [23] The carbon footprint of Greek households (1995-2012)
    Markaki, M.
    Belegri-Roboli, A.
    Sarafidis, Y.
    Mirasgedis, S.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 100 : 206 - 215
  • [24] ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT FACTORS OF THE CARBON EMISSIONS FUTURES PRICES BASED ON THE CARBON FOOTPRINT
    Qi, Mengchao
    Han, Liyan
    ICIM2014: PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWELFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, : 455 - 461
  • [25] Carbon Footprint Evaluation of the Business Event Sector in Japan
    Kitamura, Yusuke
    Karkour, Selim
    Ichisugi, Yuki
    Itsubo, Norihiro
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (12)
  • [26] On the Development of Technologies for Reducing Carbon Footprint in the Energy Sector
    A. F. Ryzhkov
    T. F. Bogatova
    A. N. Tugov
    G. E. Maslennikov
    P. V. Osipov
    A. D. Nikitin
    Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves, 2022, 58 : 494 - 506
  • [27] Carbon footprint heterogeneity across elderly groups in China
    Wang, Yunyue
    Wang, Yafei
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2025, 7 (01):
  • [28] CARBON FOOTPRINT AND INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS - AN INTRODUCTION
    Wiedmann, Thomas
    ECONOMIC SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2009, 21 (03) : 175 - 186
  • [29] The structure, drivers and policy implications of the European carbon footprint
    Wood, Richard
    Neuhoff, Karsten
    Moran, Dan
    Simas, Moana
    Grubb, Michael
    Stadler, Konstantin
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2020, 20 : S39 - S57
  • [30] Agricultural carbon footprint and food security: an assessment of multiple carbon mitigation strategies in China
    Kong, Xiangwen
    Su, Liufang
    Wang, Heng
    Qiu, Huanguang
    CHINA AGRICULTURAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2022, 14 (04) : 686 - 708