Privacy in Chinese iOS apps and impact of the personal information protection law

被引:0
作者
Kollnig, Konrad [1 ]
Zhang, Lu [2 ]
Zhao, Jun [3 ]
Shadbolt, Nigel [3 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Fac Law, Bouillonstr 1-3, NL-6211 LH Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] China Univ Polit Sci & Law, 25 Xitucheng Rd, Beijing 100088, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Oxford, Dept Comp Sci, 7 Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3QG, England
来源
COMPUTER LAW & SECURITY REVIEW | 2024年 / 55卷
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Apple; China; Data protection; iOS; Mobile apps; Privacy;
D O I
10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106041
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Privacy in apps is a topic of widespread interest because many apps collect and share large amounts of highly sensitive information. In response, the Chinese legislator introduced a range of new data protection laws over recent years, notably the Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) in 2021. So far, there exists limited research on the impacts of these new laws on apps' privacy practices. To address this gap, this paper analyses data collection in pairs of 634 Chinese iOS apps, one version from early 2020 and one from late 2021. Our work finds that many more apps now implement consent. Yet, those end-users that decline consent will often be forced to exit the app. Fewer apps now collect data without consent but many still integrate tracking libraries. Market concentration in app data collection has seen limited change. At the same time, there exists a larger number of influential and equal market participants than in the West. Among them, Apple was the only relevant foreign company. We see our findings characteristic of a first iteration at Chinese data regulation with room for improvement. With the help of enhanced technological capabilities, we expect increased enforcement of the new data rules. There is also room to refine the new laws and make them more targeted at mobile apps and the online sphere, particularly through clear and up-to-date technical specifications for software developers. As such, our findings could also be motivation for non-Chinese policy- and lawmakers to enhance their own data protection regimes.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Agarwal Yuvraj, 2013, P 11 ANN INT C MOB S
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Hangzhou Internet Court
[3]  
[Anonymous], Global Privacy Control
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), OJ2016L119/1
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, EDPB Guidelines 05/2020 on consent under Regulation 2016/679
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Hangzhou Internet Court
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2020, ONLINE PLATFORMS DIG
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Beijing Internet Court
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Case No.CGC-22-601380