A comparative performance analysis of sensible thermal energy storage (with concentrated solar field and sCO2 Brayton Cycle) and hydrogen energy storage (with solar PV field)

被引:2
作者
Mukherjee, Shubha Sankar [1 ]
Rakshit, Dibakar [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Delhi, Dept Energy Sci & Engn, New Delhi 110016, India
关键词
Supercritical CO 2 Brayton cycle; Parabolic trough solar field; Sensible thermal energy storage; Solar thermal power plant; Solar photovoltaics; Hydrogen energy storage; Capacity utilization factor; POWER-TO-GAS; TECHNOECONOMIC ASSESSMENT; MODEL; CELL; TECHNOLOGIES; EFFICIENCY; SYSTEMS; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.solener.2024.112487
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Utility scale energy storage is an integral part of renewable energy installations to achieve sustainable and reliable transition to a net zero energy economy. There exists a myriad of such storage solutions each having unique characteristics. This paper attempts at a systems level quantitative study and comparison between two different energy storage technologies, Thermal Energy Storage System (TESS) which is already mature, and Hydrogen Energy Storage System (HESS) which gained a lot of momentum recently, with the former coupled with a concentrated parabolic trough solar field using molten salt as heat transfer fluid and a power block running on high efficiency sCO2 Brayton cycle while the latter is coupled with a solar photovoltaic (PV) field. So that comparisons can be made on similar scale, both the systems are normalized on the total equipment area used for capturing incident solar irradiation, i.e., total aperture area for the PTC field and total flat surface area of PV modules. Both the systems are subjected to year-long variations of ambient conditions and solar irradiance and off-design performances are simulated over various seasons. The results show superior performance of TESS in terms of roundtrip efficiency (96% as opposed to 32% with HESS) which also results in superior capacity utilization factor (CUF of 64.5% and 48% for TESS and HESS respectively) and better specific energy and energy density. However, HESS offers virtually infinite idling time where TESS has a shorter self-discharge time (17 h), and better power performance (specific power and power density) in 10MWe output range.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] Evaluation of different methods for solar cells/modules parameters extraction
    Abdulrazzaq, Ali Kareem
    Bognar, Gyorgy
    Plesz, Balazs
    [J]. SOLAR ENERGY, 2020, 196 (196) : 183 - 195
  • [2] Simplified heat transfer model for parabolic trough solar collectors using supercritical CO2
    Aguilar, Rafael
    Valenzuela, Loreto
    Avila-Marin, Antonio L.
    Garcia-Ybarra, Pedro L.
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 196 : 807 - 820
  • [3] REVIEW OF SUPERCRITICAL CO2 POWER CYCLE TECHNOLOGY AND CURRENT STATUS OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
    Ahn, Yoonhan
    Bae, Seong Jun
    Kim, Minseok
    Cho, Seong Kuk
    Baik, Seungjoon
    Lee, Jeong Ik
    Cha, Jae Eun
    [J]. NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 47 (06) : 647 - 661
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2023, CO2 emissions in 2022, DOI DOI 10.1787/12AD1-1A-EN
  • [5] [Anonymous], Specification of containerized PEM fuel cells from Nedstack
  • [6] [Anonymous], Specification of alkaline electrolyser model MC 500 from Nel ASA.
  • [7] [Anonymous], Solcast API Toolkit
  • [8] [Anonymous], British Petroleum Statistical Review of World Energy
  • [9] [Anonymous], Specification of high pressure hydrogen storage tanks from MAHYTEC
  • [10] Techno-economic assessment of solid-gas thermochemical energy storage systems for solar thermal power applications
    Bayon, Alicia
    Bader, Roman
    Jafarian, Mehdi
    Fedunik-Hofman, Larissa
    Sun, Yanping
    Hinkley, Jim
    Miller, Sarah
    Lipinski, Wojciech
    [J]. ENERGY, 2018, 149 : 473 - 484