The efficacy of early extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for the treatment of 5 to 10 mm upper ureteral stones: An observational study

被引:0
|
作者
Aydamirov, Mubariz [1 ]
Karkin, Kadir [2 ]
Altunkol, Adem [2 ]
Vuruskan, Ediz [2 ]
Kaplan, Eyup [3 ]
Gurlen, Guclu [2 ]
Aksay, Bugra [2 ]
Akgun, Omer Faruk [2 ]
Gozukara, Keremhan [2 ]
Ortaoglu, Ferhat [2 ]
Tunckiran, Muslum Ahmet [1 ]
机构
[1] Baskent Univ, Alanya Applicat & Res Ctr, Dept Urol, Antalya, Turkiye
[2] Hlth Sci Univ, Adana City Training & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Adana, Turkiye
[3] Abdulkadir Yuksel State Hosp, Dept Urol, Gaziantep, Turkiye
关键词
renal colic; shockwave lithotripsy; ureteral calculi; urolithiasis; WAVE LITHOTRIPSY; CALCULI; ESWL;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000039103
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) performed in the early period (within the first 24 hours). Data of patients who underwent SWL with a diagnosis of unilateral radiopaque 5 to 10 mm upper ureteral stones were retrospectively examined. Patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (early SWL) consisted of patients with SWL performed within 24 hours after the onset of colic pain (<24 hours), while group 2 (deferred SWL) comprised patients with SWL performed 24 hours or more from the onset of pain (>= 24 hours). The primary endpoint of the study was planned to determine 1-month SFR in both groups. The secondary endpoint was determined to be the factor affecting SWL success. The mean age of 216 patients (130 men, 86 women) included in this study was 46.5 +/- 12.1 years. SFR within 1 month was detected in 175 patients (81%). In the early SWL group, the average number of SWL sessions was fewer (1.26 vs 1.83 P = .026) and the time to the stone-free state was shorter (11 vs 15.4 days P = .044). SFR within 1 month was higher in the early SWL group (85.5% vs 71.8% P = .036). In multivariate analysis, stone size, Hounsfield Units, and early SWL were predictive factors for SWL success. Performing SWL within the first 24 hours is highly effective in patients with symptomatic 5 to 10 mm upper ureteral stones.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the treatment of renal pelvic and proximal ureteral stones ≤2 cm in children
    Guler, Yavuz
    Erbin, Akif
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 36 (04) : 282 - 287
  • [42] Efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, with modified position of the machine head in the treatment of lower calyceal stones in obese patients
    Abou-Farha, Mohamed
    El-Abd, Ahmed
    Gameel, Tarek
    Eltatawy, Hassan
    Nagla, Salah
    UROLOGY ANNALS, 2022, 14 (01) : 81 - 84
  • [43] Usefulness of Early Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Colic Patients with Ureteral Stones
    Choi, Hyeung Joon
    Jung, Jin-Hee
    Bae, Jungbum
    Cho, Min Chul
    Lee, Hae Won
    Lee, Kwang Soo
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 53 (12) : 853 - 859
  • [44] Ureteroscopy and pneumatic lithotripsy, followed by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of distal ureteral stones
    Gurbuz, ZG
    Gonen, M
    Fazlioglu, A
    Akbulut, H
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 9 (08) : 441 - 444
  • [45] Treatment of Renal Stones ≥20 mm with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy
    Wu, Haihu
    Wang, Jianwei
    Lu, Jiaju
    Wang, Yuqiu
    Niu, Zhihong
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2016, 96 (01) : 99 - 105
  • [46] Does Previous Open Renal Stone Surgery Affect the Outcome of Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Treatment in Adults with Renal Stones?
    Gultekin, Mehmet Hamza
    Turegun, Fethi Ahmet
    Ozkan, Burak
    Tulu, Beril
    Gulec, Gamze Gul
    Tansu, Nejat
    Demirdag, Cetin
    Kendigelen, Pinar
    Erozenci, Ahmet
    Onal, Bulent
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2017, 31 (12) : 1295 - 1300
  • [47] What are the Benefits and Harms of Ureteroscopy Compared with Shock-wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Stones? A Systematic Review
    Drake, Tamsin
    Grivas, Nikolaos
    Dabestani, Saeed
    Knoll, Thomas
    Lam, Thomas
    Maclennan, Steven
    Petrik, Ales
    Skolarikos, Andreas
    Straub, Michael
    Tuerk, Christian
    Yuan, Cathy Yuhong
    Sarica, Kemal
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 72 (05) : 772 - 786
  • [48] Transgluteal versus prone approach to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for patients with distal ureteral stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Qian, Shengqiang
    Liu, Mei
    Zhang, Jindong
    Jiang, Qing
    Gao, Liang
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 44 (09) : 1137 - 1142
  • [49] Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Ureteral Stones : a Critique on Success Rate
    Barzegarnezhad, Ayoub
    Kerigh, Behzad Feizzadeh
    Azizi, Fariborz
    AMBIENT SCIENCE, 2016, 3
  • [50] In situ extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy as a primary treatment for ureteral stones
    Maghraby, H
    ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE, 2003, 23 (1-2) : 32 - 35