A Comparative Evaluation of Surface Roughness of Ceramics after Immersion in Different Oral Rinses: An In-vitro Study

被引:0
|
作者
Sankeshwari, Banashree [1 ]
Passanha, Divya [1 ]
Pattanshetti, Channaveer [2 ]
Adaki, Raghavendra [1 ]
Huddar, Dayanand [1 ]
机构
[1] Bharati Vidyapeeth Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Prosthodont, Sangli 416416, Maharashtra, India
[2] Bharati Vidyapeeth Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Oral Surg, Sangli, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Coronavirus disease-2019; Hydrogen peroxide; Mouthwashes; Povidone iodine; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; POVIDONE-IODINE; MICROHARDNESS;
D O I
10.7860/JCDR/2023/63073.18255
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The novel Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) spreads through respiratory droplets, and various strategies have been developed to reduce its spread. One of these strategies is the use of oral rinses, such as chlorhexidine, povidone iodine, and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), to reduce the viral load. However, while these rinses have advantages in preventing the spread of the virus, they may also have adverse effects on restorative materials in the oral cavity, particularly dental ceramics. The usage of mouthwashes during the pandemic may affect the surface roughness of dental ceramics, leading to plaque accumulation. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness of ceramics after immersion in different oral rinses for seven, 15, and 30 days. Materials and Methods: An in vitro study was conducted in the Department of Prosthodontics at Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital, Sangli, Maharashtra, India. The study was conducted over a period of four months, from October 2021 to January 2022. A total of 51 specimens of dental ceramics were fabricated using a mold with dimensions of 10 mm diameter x 2 mm height. These specimens were randomly divided into three groups based on the immersion solution: distilled water, hydrogen peroxide, and povidone iodine. Each immersion cycle lasted for one minute, and the immersion was performed for 30 days. Surface analysis was carried out using a Surftester at intervals of seven, 15, and 30 days. The data were statistically analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0. Intergroup comparison (>2 groups) was performed using the Kruskall-Wallis test, and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) followed by pairwise comparison using the Mann-Whitney U test. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The mean values of surface roughness for povidone iodine were 0.641, 1.569, 2.5047, and 3.4447 at 0, seven, 15, and 30 days, respectively. The mean values of surface roughness for hydrogen peroxide were 0.681, 2.360, 4.0324, and 5.7035 at 0, seven, 15, and 30 days, respectively. The mean values of surface roughness for distilled water were 0.747, 0.994, 1.3312, and 1.6088 at 0, seven, 15, and 30 days, respectively. Conclusion: The surface roughness of ceramics was significantly higher with the use of hydrogen peroxide as a mouthwash, with mean values of 0.681, 2.360, 4.0324, and 5.7035 at 0, seven, 15, and 30 days, respectively, compared to povidone iodine and distilled water. Povidone iodine can be used as a prophylactic oral rinse compared to hydrogen peroxide.
引用
收藏
页码:ZC58 / ZC61
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of the topographical surface changes and roughness of zirconia after different surface treatments
    Meryem Gülce Subaşı
    Özgür İnan
    Lasers in Medical Science, 2012, 27 : 735 - 742
  • [42] Evaluation of the topographical surface changes and roughness of zirconia after different surface treatments
    Subasi, Meryem Gulce
    Inan, Ozgur
    LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2012, 27 (04) : 735 - 742
  • [43] Comparative Evaluation of Different Obturation Techniques for Root Canal Filling of Permanent Teeth: An In-Vitro Study
    Chib, Adhishree S.
    Padmawar, Neeta S.
    Waghmare, Sonali
    Tiwari, Durgesh A.
    Mulani, Shahinwaz
    Bhatt, Megna
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (09)
  • [44] COMPARATIVE EVALUATION TO CHECK SEALING ABILITY OF DIFFERENT OBTURATION TECHNIQUES BY CONFOCAL MICROSCOPE: AN IN-VITRO STUDY
    Rajkumar, B.
    Nandamuri, Sridevi
    Bhatt, Akanksha
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2022, 14 (05) : 2212 - 2217
  • [45] Comparative Evaluation of Sorption and Solubility of Core Buildup Materials in Different pH Media: An In-Vitro Study
    Khan, Waseem
    Singh, Kapilesh B.
    Patil, Damini
    Banerjee, Anik
    Ahire, Chetan D.
    Singh, Vikas
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (05)
  • [46] Surface roughness and cyclic fatigue resistance of a novel shaping system: An in-vitro study
    Ozel, Beliz
    Barut, Guher
    Baser Can, Elif Delve
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (05):
  • [47] Comparative in-vitro microscopic evaluation of vertical marginal discrepancy, microhardness, and surface roughness of nickel-chromium in new and recast alloy
    Das, Gotam
    Chaturvedi, Saurabh
    Naqash, Talib Amin
    Hussain, Muhammad Waqar
    Saquib, Shahabe
    Suleman, Ghazala
    Sindi, Abdulelah Sameer
    Shafi, Shabina
    Sharif, Rania A.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [48] Comparative evaluation of the effect of denture cleansers on the surface topography of denture base materials: An in-vitro study
    Jeyapalan, Karthigeyan
    Kumar, Jaya Krishna
    Azhagarasan, N. S.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2015, 7 (06): : 548 - 553
  • [49] Comparative Evaluation of Surface Roughness of Different Rotary Nickel-Titanium (NiTi) Files After Autoclaving: An Atomic Force Microscopic Study
    Alex, Angela
    Sivarajan, Ranjith Kumar
    Venkatesh, Vijay
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (08)
  • [50] Evaluation of the Effect of Air Polishing With Different Abrasive Powders on the Roughness of Implant Abutment Surface: An In Vitro Study
    Biazussi, Beatriz Rosa
    Perrotti, Vittoria
    D'Arcangelo, Camillo
    Elias, Carlos Nelson
    Bianchini, Marco Aurelio
    Tumedei, Margherita
    de Vasconcellos, Diego Klee
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2019, 45 (03) : 202 - 206