A Comparative Evaluation of Surface Roughness of Ceramics after Immersion in Different Oral Rinses: An In-vitro Study

被引:0
|
作者
Sankeshwari, Banashree [1 ]
Passanha, Divya [1 ]
Pattanshetti, Channaveer [2 ]
Adaki, Raghavendra [1 ]
Huddar, Dayanand [1 ]
机构
[1] Bharati Vidyapeeth Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Prosthodont, Sangli 416416, Maharashtra, India
[2] Bharati Vidyapeeth Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Oral Surg, Sangli, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Coronavirus disease-2019; Hydrogen peroxide; Mouthwashes; Povidone iodine; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; POVIDONE-IODINE; MICROHARDNESS;
D O I
10.7860/JCDR/2023/63073.18255
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The novel Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) spreads through respiratory droplets, and various strategies have been developed to reduce its spread. One of these strategies is the use of oral rinses, such as chlorhexidine, povidone iodine, and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), to reduce the viral load. However, while these rinses have advantages in preventing the spread of the virus, they may also have adverse effects on restorative materials in the oral cavity, particularly dental ceramics. The usage of mouthwashes during the pandemic may affect the surface roughness of dental ceramics, leading to plaque accumulation. Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness of ceramics after immersion in different oral rinses for seven, 15, and 30 days. Materials and Methods: An in vitro study was conducted in the Department of Prosthodontics at Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital, Sangli, Maharashtra, India. The study was conducted over a period of four months, from October 2021 to January 2022. A total of 51 specimens of dental ceramics were fabricated using a mold with dimensions of 10 mm diameter x 2 mm height. These specimens were randomly divided into three groups based on the immersion solution: distilled water, hydrogen peroxide, and povidone iodine. Each immersion cycle lasted for one minute, and the immersion was performed for 30 days. Surface analysis was carried out using a Surftester at intervals of seven, 15, and 30 days. The data were statistically analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0. Intergroup comparison (>2 groups) was performed using the Kruskall-Wallis test, and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) followed by pairwise comparison using the Mann-Whitney U test. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The mean values of surface roughness for povidone iodine were 0.641, 1.569, 2.5047, and 3.4447 at 0, seven, 15, and 30 days, respectively. The mean values of surface roughness for hydrogen peroxide were 0.681, 2.360, 4.0324, and 5.7035 at 0, seven, 15, and 30 days, respectively. The mean values of surface roughness for distilled water were 0.747, 0.994, 1.3312, and 1.6088 at 0, seven, 15, and 30 days, respectively. Conclusion: The surface roughness of ceramics was significantly higher with the use of hydrogen peroxide as a mouthwash, with mean values of 0.681, 2.360, 4.0324, and 5.7035 at 0, seven, 15, and 30 days, respectively, compared to povidone iodine and distilled water. Povidone iodine can be used as a prophylactic oral rinse compared to hydrogen peroxide.
引用
收藏
页码:ZC58 / ZC61
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Releasing Ability of Various Restorative Materials after the Application of Surface Coating Agents - An In-vitro Study
    Kishore, G. V. S.
    Sai-Sankar, A. J.
    Pratap-Gowd, M. J. S.
    Sridhar, M.
    Pranitha, Kakarla
    Sai-Krishna, V. S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2016, 10 (12) : ZC38 - ZC41
  • [32] Comparative Evaluation of Surface Roughness of Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer and Glass Hybrid Restorative Materials Simulated by Tooth Brushing: An in-Vitro Study
    Komandla, Divya Rao
    Acharya, Shashi Rashmi
    Pentapati, Kalyana Chakravarthy
    PESQUISA BRASILEIRA EM ODONTOPEDIATRIA E CLINICA INTEGRADA, 2021, 21
  • [33] Comparative in-vitro microscopic evaluation of vertical marginal discrepancy, microhardness, and surface roughness of nickel–chromium in new and recast alloy
    Gotam Das
    Saurabh chaturvedi
    Talib Amin Naqash
    Muhammad Waqar Hussain
    Shahabe Saquib
    Ghazala Suleman
    Abdulelah Sameer Sindi
    Shabina Shafi
    Rania A. Sharif
    Scientific Reports, 13 (1)
  • [34] Comparative Evaluation on the Effects of Three Pediatric Syrups on Microhardness, Roughness and Staining of the Primary Teeth Enamel: An In-Vitro Study
    Mukundan, Divya
    Vignesh, R.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [35] AN IN VITRO EVALUATION OF ZIRCONIA SURFACE ROUGHNESS CAUSED BY DIFFERENT SCALING METHODS
    Vigolo, Paolo
    Motterle, Melissa
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2010, 103 (05): : 283 - 287
  • [36] Surface roughness of different types of resin composites after artificial aging procedures: an in vitro study
    Bicer, Zeynep
    Yaman, Batu Can
    Celiksoz, Ozge
    Tepe, Hatice
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [37] Comparative Evaluation of the Surface Hardness of Different Esthetic Restorative Materials: An In Vitro Study
    Samuel, Anoop
    Raju, Rinsa
    Sreejith, K. B.
    Kalathil, Binitha M.
    Nenavath, Deepthi
    Chaitra, V. S.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2020, 12 : 124 - 128
  • [38] Evaluation of dimensional accuracy, flexural strength and surface roughness of 3D-printable denture base resin modified with different concentrations of cerium oxide nanoparticles: a comparative in-vitro study
    Ibrahim A. Mohamed
    Mohamed sherine El Attar
    Sonia M. El Shabrawy
    Eman Zaghloul Alrafah
    BMC Oral Health, 25 (1)
  • [39] Effects of mouthwashes on Knoop hardness and surface roughness of dental composites after different immersion times
    Miranda, Diogo de Azevedo
    dos Santos Bertoldo, Carlos Eduardo
    Baggio Aguiar, Flavio Henrique
    Nunes Leite Lima, Debora Alves
    Lovadino, Jose Roberto
    BRAZILIAN ORAL RESEARCH, 2011, 25 (02): : 168 - 173
  • [40] Comparative evaluation of enamel surface roughness after debonding using four finishing and polishing systems for residual resin removal—an in vitro study
    Priyanka Shah
    Padmaja Sharma
    Santosh Kumar Goje
    Nikita Kanzariya
    Maitry Parikh
    Progress in Orthodontics, 20