Impact of central-line-associated bloodstream infections and catheter-related bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Elangovan, S. [1 ]
Lo, J. J. [2 ]
Xie, Y. [1 ]
Mitchell, B. [3 ]
Graves, N. [1 ]
Cai, Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke NUS Med Sch, Programme Hlth Serv & Syst Res, 8 Coll Rd, Singapore 169857, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Saw Swee Hock Sch Publ Hlth, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Avondale Univ, Fac Nursing & Hlth, Cooranbong, Australia
关键词
Central-line bloodstream; infections; Healthcare-associated; Outcomes analysis; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER; INTENSIVE-CARE UNITS; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; LENGTH-OF-STAY; HEALTH-CARE; RISK-FACTORS; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; ATTRIBUTABLE COST; SINGLE-CENTER; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhin.2024.08.002
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Accurate effect estimates are needed to inform input parameters of health economic models. Central-line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and catheterrelated bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are different definitions used for central-line bloodstream infections and may represent dissimilar patients, but previous metaanalyses did not differentiate between CLABSIs/CRBSIs. Aim: To determine outcome effect estimates in CLABSI and CRBSI patients, compared to uninfected patients. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL were searched from January 2000 to March 2024 for full-text studies reporting all-cause mortality and/or hospital length of stay (LOS) in adult inpatients with and without CLABSI/CRBSI. Two investigators independently reviewed all potentially relevant studies and performed data extraction. Odds ratio for mortality and mean difference in LOS were pooled using random-effects models. Risk of study bias was assessed using ROBINS-E. Findings: Thirty-six studies were included. Sixteen CLABSI and 12 CRBSI studies reported mortality. The mortality odds ratios of CLABSIs and CRBSIs, compared to uninfected patients, were 3.19 (95% CI: 2.44, 4.16; I2 = 49%) and 2.47(95% CI: 1.51, 4.02; I2 = 82%), respectively. Twelve CLABSI and eight CRBSI studies reported hospital LOS; only three CLABSI studies and two CRBSI studies accounted for the time-dependent nature of CLABSIs/CRBSIs. The mean differences in LOS for CLABSIs and CRBSIs compared to uninfected patients were 16.14 days (95% CI: 9.27, 23.01; I2 = 91%) and 16.26 days (95% CI: 10.19, 22.33; I2 = 66%), respectively. Conclusion: CLABSIs and CRBSIs increase mortality risk and hospital LOS. Few published studies accounted for the time-dependent nature of CLABSIs/CRBSIs, which can result in overestimation of excess hospital LOS. (c) 2024 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 137
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Current Approach for the Prevention of Central Venous Catheter-related Bloodstream Infections in Children
    Benligul, Ebru Melek
    Bektas, Murat
    Arslan, Gazi
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY AND INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 8 (02) : 67 - 76
  • [22] Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections: A Multicentric Five-Year Analysis
    Demirel, Aslihan
    Efe-Iris, Nur
    Cevik, Esin
    Koculu, Safiye
    Baygul, Arzu
    Tasdelen-Fisgin, Nuriye
    KLIMIK JOURNAL, 2019, 32 (02) : 117 - 122
  • [23] "Targeting to Zero" in Pediatric Oncology: A Review of Central Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections
    Secola, Rita
    Lewis, Mary Ann
    Pike, Nancy
    Needleman, Jack
    Doering, Lynn
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2012, 29 (01) : 14 - 27
  • [24] Systematic review of antimicrobial lock therapy for prevention of central-line-associated bloodstream infections in adult and pediatric cancer patients
    Norris, LeAnn B.
    Kablaoui, Farah
    Brilhart, Maggie K.
    Bookstaver, P. Brandon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2017, 50 (03) : 308 - 317
  • [25] Sex-Disaggregated Analysis of Central Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in Patients with Cancer
    Schalk, Enrico
    Seltmann, Alva
    Boell, Boris
    Giesen, Nicola
    Grans-Siebel, Judit
    Kriege, Oliver
    Lanznaster, Julia
    Minti, Antrea
    Naendrup, Jan-Hendrik
    Neitz, Julia
    Panse, Jens
    Schmidt-Hieber, Martin
    Seggewiss-Bernhardt, Ruth
    Teschner, Daniel
    Weber, Philipp
    Wille, Kai
    von Lilienfeld-Toal, Marie
    Hentrich, Marcus
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2024, : 37 - 46
  • [26] Short-term Peripheral Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review
    Mermel, Leonard A.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2017, 65 (10) : 1757 - 1762
  • [27] Reducing Central Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in Children With Cancer
    Horvath, Brandi
    Norville, Robbie
    Lee, Deborah
    Hyde, Annie
    Gregurich, MaryAnn
    Hockenberry, Marilyn
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2009, 36 (02) : 232 - 238
  • [28] Clinical impact of early reinsertion of a central venous catheter after catheter removal in patients with catheter-related bloodstream infections
    Lee, Yu-Mi
    Ryu, Byung-Han
    Hong, Sun In
    Cho, Oh-Hyun
    Hong, Kyung-Wook
    Bae, In-Gyu
    Kwack, Won Gun
    Kim, Young Jin
    Chung, Eun Kyoung
    Kim, Dong Youn
    Lee, Mi Suk
    Park, Ki-Ho
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 42 (02) : 162 - 168
  • [29] Antiseptic barrier cap effective in reducing central line-associated bloodstream infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    in 't holt, Anne F. Voor
    Helder, Onno K.
    Vos, Margreet C.
    Schafthuizen, Laura
    Sulz, Sandra
    van den Hoogen, Agnes
    Ista, Erwin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2017, 69 : 34 - 40
  • [30] Catheter-related bloodstream infections: catheter management according to pathogen
    Leonidou, Leonidia
    Gogos, Charalambos A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2010, 36 : S26 - S32