Impact of central-line-associated bloodstream infections and catheter-related bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Elangovan, S. [1 ]
Lo, J. J. [2 ]
Xie, Y. [1 ]
Mitchell, B. [3 ]
Graves, N. [1 ]
Cai, Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke NUS Med Sch, Programme Hlth Serv & Syst Res, 8 Coll Rd, Singapore 169857, Singapore
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Saw Swee Hock Sch Publ Hlth, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Avondale Univ, Fac Nursing & Hlth, Cooranbong, Australia
关键词
Central-line bloodstream; infections; Healthcare-associated; Outcomes analysis; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER; INTENSIVE-CARE UNITS; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; LENGTH-OF-STAY; HEALTH-CARE; RISK-FACTORS; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; ATTRIBUTABLE COST; SINGLE-CENTER; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhin.2024.08.002
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Accurate effect estimates are needed to inform input parameters of health economic models. Central-line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) and catheterrelated bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) are different definitions used for central-line bloodstream infections and may represent dissimilar patients, but previous metaanalyses did not differentiate between CLABSIs/CRBSIs. Aim: To determine outcome effect estimates in CLABSI and CRBSI patients, compared to uninfected patients. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL were searched from January 2000 to March 2024 for full-text studies reporting all-cause mortality and/or hospital length of stay (LOS) in adult inpatients with and without CLABSI/CRBSI. Two investigators independently reviewed all potentially relevant studies and performed data extraction. Odds ratio for mortality and mean difference in LOS were pooled using random-effects models. Risk of study bias was assessed using ROBINS-E. Findings: Thirty-six studies were included. Sixteen CLABSI and 12 CRBSI studies reported mortality. The mortality odds ratios of CLABSIs and CRBSIs, compared to uninfected patients, were 3.19 (95% CI: 2.44, 4.16; I2 = 49%) and 2.47(95% CI: 1.51, 4.02; I2 = 82%), respectively. Twelve CLABSI and eight CRBSI studies reported hospital LOS; only three CLABSI studies and two CRBSI studies accounted for the time-dependent nature of CLABSIs/CRBSIs. The mean differences in LOS for CLABSIs and CRBSIs compared to uninfected patients were 16.14 days (95% CI: 9.27, 23.01; I2 = 91%) and 16.26 days (95% CI: 10.19, 22.33; I2 = 66%), respectively. Conclusion: CLABSIs and CRBSIs increase mortality risk and hospital LOS. Few published studies accounted for the time-dependent nature of CLABSIs/CRBSIs, which can result in overestimation of excess hospital LOS. (c) 2024 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 137
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of catheter-related bloodstream infections on the mortality of critically ill patients: A meta-analysis
    Siempos, Ilias I.
    Kopterides, Petros
    Tsangaris, Iraklis
    Dimopoulou, Ioanna
    Armaganidis, Apostolos E.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (07) : 2283 - 2289
  • [2] Catheter salvage strategies in children with central venous catheter-related or -associated bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Buonsenso, D.
    Salerno, G.
    Sodero, G.
    Mariani, F.
    Pisapia, L.
    Gelormini, C.
    Di Nardo, M.
    Valentini, P.
    Scoppettuolo, G.
    Biasucci, D. G.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2022, 125 : 1 - 20
  • [3] Interventions to reduce unnecessary central venous catheter use to prevent central-line-associated bloodstream infections in adults: A systematic review
    Xiong, Zhaoyu
    Chen, Haiyan
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 39 (12) : 1442 - 1448
  • [4] Attributable mortality of central line associated bloodstream infection: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ziegler, Matthew J.
    Pellegrini, Daniela C.
    Safdar, Nasia
    INFECTION, 2015, 43 (01) : 29 - 36
  • [5] Effectiveness of insertion and maintenance bundles to prevent central-line-associated bloodstream infections in critically ill patients of all ages: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ista, Erwin
    van der Hoven, Ben
    Kornelisse, Rene F.
    van der Starre, Cynthia
    Vos, Margreet C.
    Boersma, Eric
    Helder, Onno K.
    LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2016, 16 (06) : 724 - 734
  • [6] Bloodstream Infections and Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections
    Watson, Christopher M.
    Al-Hasan, Majdi N.
    SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 94 (06) : 1233 - +
  • [7] Incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infections following ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Takeshita, Jun
    Tachibana, Kazuya
    Nakajima, Yasufumi
    Shime, Nobuaki
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [8] Intravascular Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections
    Rupp, Mark E.
    Karnatak, Rajendra
    INFECTIOUS DISEASE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 32 (04) : 765 - +
  • [9] Comparative Efficacy of Antimicrobial Central Venous Catheters in Reducing Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in Adults: Abridged Cochrane Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Chong, Huey Yi
    Lai, Nai Ming
    Apisarnthanarak, Anucha
    Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2017, 64 : S131 - S140
  • [10] Effectiveness of Antimicrobial Lock Therapy for the Treatment of Catheter-Related and Central-Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Children: A Single Center Retrospective Study
    Signorino, Claudia
    Fusco, Eleonora
    Galli, Luisa
    Chiappini, Elena
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2023, 12 (05):