Retzius-sparing versus standard robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: A two-year patient-reported and oncological assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Diamand, Romain [1 ]
Bernard, Pierre-Loup [2 ]
Mjaess, Georges [1 ]
Benijts, Jan [2 ]
Assenmacher, Christophe [2 ]
Assenmacher, Gregoire [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Erasme Hosp, Hop Univ Bruxelles, Jules Bordet Inst,Dept Urol, Brussels, Belgium
[2] Europe Hosp, Dept Urol, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
functional outcomes; prostate cancer; quality of life; Retzius-sparing; radical prostatectomy; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; CANCER; INCONTINENCE;
D O I
10.1002/pros.24807
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the two-year functional and oncological outcomes of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (rsRALP) and standard approach (sRALP). Methods: A total of 200 consecutive patients who underwent either sRALP (n = 100) or rsRALP (n = 100) for clinically localized PCa at a single referral European center between 2015 and 2020 were identified from a prospectively cohort, as part of the Belgian Cancer Registry. Primary outcomes included functional outcomes and quality of life (QoL) using validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) assessed at 1-, 3-, 12-, and 24-months post-surgery. Secondary outcomes comprised oncological outcomes reported as positive surgical margins (PSM) and 5-year biochemical recurrence (BCR). Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test and multivariable Cox regression were used. Results: The median follow-up was 60 months. No significant differences were observed between the surgical approaches in terms of patient and tumor characteristics. Urinary function and QoL were significantly better at each follow-up period (all p <= 0.01) with rsRALP, while sexual function was not significantly different 12 months after surgery. No significant difference in positive surgical margins rate was observed between surgical approaches (31% vs 32%, p = 0.9). Retzius-sparing RALP was associated with longer PSM lengths (5 mm vs 2.5 mm, p = 0.02), a higher multifocality rate (34% vs. 13%, p < 0.001), more occurrences in organ-confined disease (59% vs. 39%, p < 0.001) and at anterior locations (37% vs. 16%, p = 0.05). Five-year BCR-free survival was not significantly different, and surgical approach was not a predictor of BCR. Conclusions: The rsRALP approach significantly improves both early and short-term urinary function and QoL compared to sRALP. Despite being associated with worse PSM characteristics, no significant decrease in BCR-free survival was observed with rsRALP.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 122
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transvesical Retzius-Sparing Versus Standard Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Adjusted Analysis
    Deng, Wen
    Jiang, Hao
    Liu, Xiaoqiang
    Chen, Luyao
    Liu, Weipeng
    Zhang, Cheng
    Zhou, Xiaochen
    Fu, Bin
    Wang, Gongxian
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [22] Effects of Retzius sparing on robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a systematic review with meta-analysis
    Tai, Ting-En
    Wu, Chien-Chih
    Kang, Yi-No
    Wu, Jeng-Cheng
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 34 (09): : 4020 - 4029
  • [23] Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RS-RARP) vs standard RARP: it's time for critical appraisal
    Stonier, Thomas
    Simson, Nick
    Davis, John
    Challacombe, Ben
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 123 (01) : 5 - 7
  • [24] Comparison of single-port and multi-port Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
    Alexander L. Shiang
    Joshua K. Palka
    Shiva Balasubramanian
    R. Sherburne Figenshau
    Zachary L. Smith
    Eric H. Kim
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2023, 17 : 835 - 840
  • [25] Retzius-Sparing versus Standard Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Comparative Prospective Study of Nearly 500 Patients
    Umari, Paolo
    Eden, Christopher
    Cahill, Declan
    Rizzo, Michele
    Eden, Dominic
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 205 (03) : 780 - 790
  • [26] Retzius-sparing versus standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized comparison on immediate continence rates
    Anastasios D. Asimakopoulos
    Luca Topazio
    Michele De Angelis
    Enrico Finazzi Agrò
    Antonio Luigi Pastore
    Andrea Fuschi
    Filippo Annino
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2019, 33 : 2187 - 2196
  • [27] Simultaneous Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy
    Raheem, Ali Abdel
    Santok, Glen Denmer
    Kim, Dae Keun
    Troya, Irela Soto
    Alabdulaali, Ibrahim
    Choi, Young Deuk
    Rha, Koon Ho
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2016, 57 (02) : 146 - 149
  • [28] Association of preoperative urethral parameters on magnetic resonance imaging and immediate recovery of continence following Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Li, Youjian
    Li, Weijian
    Lu, Wenfeng
    Chen, Mengxia
    Gao, Jie
    Yang, Yang
    Zhuang, Junlong
    Li, Xiaogong
    Guo, Hongqian
    Qiu, Xuefeng
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (02) : 501 - 509
  • [29] Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: combining the best of retropubic and perineal approaches
    Lim, Sey Kiat
    Kim, Kwang Hyun
    Shin, Tae-Young
    Han, Woong Kyu
    Chung, Byung Ha
    Hong, Sung Joon
    Choi, Young Deuk
    Rha, Koon Ho
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 114 (02) : 236 - 244
  • [30] Comparison of Early Urinary Continence, Oncological Outcomes, and Postoperative Complications in Retzius-Sparing and Standard Approach Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Yilmaz, Kayhan
    Olcucu, Mahmut Taha
    Ozsoy, Cagatay
    Aksaray, Eren Erdi
    Kilic, Sahin
    Ates, Mutlu
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 33 (02): : 150 - 154