Retzius-sparing versus standard robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: A two-year patient-reported and oncological assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Diamand, Romain [1 ]
Bernard, Pierre-Loup [2 ]
Mjaess, Georges [1 ]
Benijts, Jan [2 ]
Assenmacher, Christophe [2 ]
Assenmacher, Gregoire [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Erasme Hosp, Hop Univ Bruxelles, Jules Bordet Inst,Dept Urol, Brussels, Belgium
[2] Europe Hosp, Dept Urol, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
functional outcomes; prostate cancer; quality of life; Retzius-sparing; radical prostatectomy; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; CANCER; INCONTINENCE;
D O I
10.1002/pros.24807
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the two-year functional and oncological outcomes of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (rsRALP) and standard approach (sRALP). Methods: A total of 200 consecutive patients who underwent either sRALP (n = 100) or rsRALP (n = 100) for clinically localized PCa at a single referral European center between 2015 and 2020 were identified from a prospectively cohort, as part of the Belgian Cancer Registry. Primary outcomes included functional outcomes and quality of life (QoL) using validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) assessed at 1-, 3-, 12-, and 24-months post-surgery. Secondary outcomes comprised oncological outcomes reported as positive surgical margins (PSM) and 5-year biochemical recurrence (BCR). Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test and multivariable Cox regression were used. Results: The median follow-up was 60 months. No significant differences were observed between the surgical approaches in terms of patient and tumor characteristics. Urinary function and QoL were significantly better at each follow-up period (all p <= 0.01) with rsRALP, while sexual function was not significantly different 12 months after surgery. No significant difference in positive surgical margins rate was observed between surgical approaches (31% vs 32%, p = 0.9). Retzius-sparing RALP was associated with longer PSM lengths (5 mm vs 2.5 mm, p = 0.02), a higher multifocality rate (34% vs. 13%, p < 0.001), more occurrences in organ-confined disease (59% vs. 39%, p < 0.001) and at anterior locations (37% vs. 16%, p = 0.05). Five-year BCR-free survival was not significantly different, and surgical approach was not a predictor of BCR. Conclusions: The rsRALP approach significantly improves both early and short-term urinary function and QoL compared to sRALP. Despite being associated with worse PSM characteristics, no significant decrease in BCR-free survival was observed with rsRALP.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 122
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Retzius-sparing versus standard robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer
    Rosenberg, Joel E.
    Jung, Jae Hung
    Edgerton, Zach
    Lee, Hunju
    Lee, Solam
    Bakker, Caitlin J.
    Dahm, Philipp
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 128 (01) : 12 - 20
  • [2] Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Nagasubramanian, Santhosh
    Leow, Jeffrey J.
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2025, 39 : S27 - S34
  • [3] The Comparison of Conventional and Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Clinical, Pathological, and Oncological Outcomes
    Karsiyakali, Nejdet
    Ozgen, Mahir Bulent
    Ozveren, Bora
    Durak, Haydar
    Saglican, Yesim
    Turkeri, Levent
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2022, 9 (01): : 1 - 8
  • [4] Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a medium size oncological center holds adequate oncological and functional outcomes
    Fonseca, Jorge
    Moraes-Fontes, Maria Francisca
    Rebola, Jorge
    Lucio, Rui
    Almeida, Miguel
    Muresan, Ciprian
    Palmas, Artur
    Gaivao, Ana
    Matos, Celso
    Santos, Tiago
    Dias, Daniela
    Sousa, Ines
    Oliveira, Francisco
    Ribeiro, Ricardo
    Lopez-Beltran, Antonio
    Fraga, Avelino
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 17 (03) : 1133 - 1142
  • [5] Comparison of Retzius-Sparing versus Standard Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer
    Tahra, A.
    Sen, U. T.
    Sobay, R.
    Inkaya, A.
    Kucuk, E., V
    Boylu, U.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2022, 46 (05): : 293 - 300
  • [6] Does transition from standard to Retzius-sparing technique in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy affect the functional and oncological outcomes?
    Anil, Hakan
    Karamik, Kaan
    Yildiz, Ali
    Savas, Murat
    ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA, 2021, 93 (04) : 399 - 403
  • [7] Comparison of single-port and multi-port Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
    Shiang, Alexander L.
    Palka, Joshua K.
    Balasubramanian, Shiva
    Figenshau, R. Sherburne
    Smith, Zachary L.
    Kim, Eric H.
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 17 (03) : 835 - 840
  • [8] Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer
    Rosenberg, Joel E.
    Jung, Jae Hung
    Edgerton, Zach
    Lee, Hunju
    Lee, Solam
    Bakker, Caitlin J.
    Dahm, Philipp
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, (08): : CD013641
  • [9] Pelvic Anatomical Features After Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Intended for Early Recovery of Urinary Symptoms
    Ota, Yuya
    Hamamoto, Shuzo
    Matsuyama, Nayuka
    Hamakawa, Takashi
    Iwatsuki, Shoichiro
    Etani, Toshiki
    Taguchi, Kazumi
    Naiki, Taku
    Ando, Ryosuke
    Nakane, Akihiro
    Okada, Atsushi
    Kawai, Noriyasu
    Kubota, Yasue
    Yasui, Takahiro
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2021, 35 (03) : 296 - 304
  • [10] Perioperative and short-term outcomes of Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy stratified by gland size
    Santok, Glen D. R.
    Raheem, Ali Abdel
    Kim, Lawrence H. C.
    Chang, Kidon
    Lum, Trenton G. H.
    Chung, Byung H.
    Choi, Young D.
    Rha, Koon H.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 119 (01) : 135 - 141